Sentences with phrase «omniscience which»

Absolute knowledge is omniscience which is a quality ascribed to a god.

The Earth as universal mother and creatrix par excellence is not omniscient, that is to say that she does not have that omniscience which is rooted in all - seeing (the Greek oida, «I know,» properly means «I have seen»).

The visual omniscience which is naturally proper to the Celestial Being is proper to him because of the luminosity of the heavens.

Not exact matches

Liddon was slightly uneasy about the verse in which Jesus said that only the Father knew the date of the End, but claimed that «the knowledge infused into the human soul of Jesus was ordinarily and practically equivalent to omniscience».17

For further definition of «the problem of radical particularity,» the position from which Hartshorne is criticized later in this article, and for more detailed discussion of Hartshorne's theory of divine relativity, please see my «Omniscience and the Problem of Radical Particularity: Does God Know How to Ride a Bike,» International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 42 (1997), 1 - 22, and «Divine Passibility and the Problem of Radical Particularity: Does God Feel Your Pain?

Oomen rejects such immutable omniscience, which undercuts any genuine freedom.

Experientially omniscience is related to the ordered process by which all things come into being.

God is one entity, which is manifested as omniscience, omnipotence, power, will, and the like.

He could try to argue that a God with traditional omniscience would have the power to actualize any of the possible worlds of which he was aware and thus that those FWTs who affirm the existence of such a being really should deny that genuine evil exists.

Since His love - in - operation is His essential nature — He is love, which is His «root - attribute», not aseity, as the older theology claimed — the other things said about Him (transcendence, immanence, omnipotence, omniscience, omni - presence, righteousness, etc.) are to be understood, as I have already argued earlier, as adverbially descriptive of His mode of being love rather than set up as separate or even as distinct attributions.

If omniscience exists, then one can not actually make a choice which wasn't already known to be inevitably made; if one could, then there's no omniscience.

He demonstrated that God could not be conceived of as a being (which would make him subordinate to the category of Being per se and merely one being among other beings), and he cautioned against identifying the traditional God with Being (for Being could have none of the attributes — beneficence, love, omniscience, etc. — that are applied to the God who is a being).

The third way in which Creel develops his criticism of the implications of Hartshorne's view for God's omniscience has to do with the nonrepeatability of qualities and the purported consequence that God's memory of an event must inevitably grow more and more erroneous as time passes (PS 12:225 - 28).

I am not in the Gnostic, Jesus - is - only - divine - not - human camp; He was and is human (yesterday, today and forever, in fact); however, I would argue that as divine, Jesus shares in the divine attributes, of which omniscience is one.

Just as the divine omnipotence and omniscience can not be realized existentially apart from his word uttered with reference to a particular moment and heard in that moment, so this Word is what it is only in the moment in reference to which it is uttered.

Of course, we have to admit that human beings have neither the unlimited power that characterizes divinity with respect to humanity nor the scope of insight and knowledge which has been characterized in the tradition as omniscience.

Now, somewhat parenthetically, let me offer you a different way of thinking about omniscience, which is connected to God's timelessness.

=============== Summary: Other than your comment about God being constrained by time when He is within our space / time (which was addressed in point # 1 above), the remainder of your comments had to do with objections that you have with respect to God's actions, nothing to do with the traits of omniscience and omnipotent being mutually exclusive, which was your original data point for the impossibility of God to exist.

You said, «Summary: Other than your comment about God being constrained by time when He is within our space / time (which was addressed in point # 1 above), the remainder of your comments had to do with objections that you have with respect to God's actions, nothing to do with the traits of omniscience and omnipotent being mutually exclusive, which was your original data point for the impossibility of God to exist.»

Fortunately, you can toggle the level of the car's omniscience via a steering - wheel button, which is perfect for when you pull off the highway and face miles of twisty country roads.

And at the very top, capped with iron painted a brilliant red, was its lantern room, in which rotated the Fresnel lens, as faceted as a sultana's engagement diamond, and which, like the eye of Argus, was chambered myriad ways, as close to omniscience as technology could dare.