On the costs of climate change mitigation, the most comprehensive work is probably that which has been done by Nicholas Stern, beginning with the Stern Review.
Sir Nicholas Stern is a former World Bank chief economist and the author of a landmark report
on the costs of climate change.
In the past nine months there have been a half dozen or so reports released
on the cost of climate change all met with backlash and outcries of leftist environmentalist dooms day sayers.
Not exact matches
But these cooler streets also reflect less heat onto buildings, saving
on air - conditioning
costs and reducing the effects
of climate change.
In the future, the declining
cost of tech might
change those economics, but overcoming
climate change is too important to bet entirely
on that.
Among the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially are the following: (1) worldwide economic, political, and capital markets conditions and other factors beyond the Company's control, including natural and other disasters or
climate change affecting the operations
of the Company or its customers and suppliers; (2) the Company's credit ratings and its
cost of capital; (3) competitive conditions and customer preferences; (4) foreign currency exchange rates and fluctuations in those rates; (5) the timing and market acceptance
of new product offerings; (6) the availability and
cost of purchased components, compounds, raw materials and energy (including oil and natural gas and their derivatives) due to shortages, increased demand or supply interruptions (including those caused by natural and other disasters and other events); (7) the impact
of acquisitions, strategic alliances, divestitures, and other unusual events resulting from portfolio management actions and other evolving business strategies, and possible organizational restructuring; (8) generating fewer productivity improvements than estimated; (9) unanticipated problems or delays with the phased implementation
of a global enterprise resource planning (ERP) system, or security breaches and other disruptions to the Company's information technology infrastructure; (10) financial market risks that may affect the Company's funding obligations under defined benefit pension and postretirement plans; and (11) legal proceedings, including significant developments that could occur in the legal and regulatory proceedings described in the Company's Annual Report
on Form 10 - K for the year ended Dec. 31, 2017, and any subsequent quarterly reports
on Form 10 - Q (the «Reports»).
Meanwhile, the former governor
of the Bank
of Canada raised a red flag about the «carbon bubble,» Canada's premiers agreed to develop a Canadian energy strategy that would address
climate change, and Elon Musk broke ground
on his Gigafactory that will slash the
costs of electric vehicle batteries and, by extension, the cars themselves.
In 2011, the National Roundtable
on the Economy and the Environment calculated that the
cost of climate change for Canada could grow to between $ 21 to $ 43 billion a year by 2050 — roughly one per cent
of GDP that year.
Our mission is to support the growth
of public banking in Massachusetts, initially focusing
on an infrastructure bank to help cities and towns with the
costs of upgrading buildings, roads, and water systems, with environmental remediation and adaption to a
changing climate, and with improving city services.
In CETA there is also a provision which says that the
costs of pollution are borne by the polluter and requires Canada and Europe to prioritize trade in environmental goods and services related to renewable energy and co-operate
on climate change adaptation and mitigation.
On Tuesday, a coalition — including former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg and former Secretary of the Treasury and Goldman Sachs alum Henry Paulson — released a study on the economic costs of climate chang
On Tuesday, a coalition — including former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg and former Secretary
of the Treasury and Goldman Sachs alum Henry Paulson — released a study
on the economic costs of climate chang
on the economic
costs of climate change.
Most Canadians believe action should be taken
on climate change, and
of all the options available, carbon pricing comes with the lowest economic
costs
I'd like to think we did it because we didn't want to press our luck anymore, because repairs
cost more than the Blue Book said you were worth, because you didn't have anti-lock brakes or passenger - side airbags, because we really couldn't have you breaking down
on a late - night drive home from the airport or
on a busy interstate, because
of fuel economy and our deepening concern over
climate change.
ALBANY — After a two - hour debate that touched
on climate change and several anti-Semitic incidents at the City University
of New York, Republicans in the state Senate endorsed a one - house budget resolution that shifts
costs to New York City, increases aid for public schools and cuts taxes for middle - income New Yorkers.
The
cost of environmental damage, which is based
on Sir Nicholas Stern's review
on the economic
costs of climate change, will continue to rise every year until it reaches a mark
of # 59.60 a tonne by 2050.
As Chris Huhne has argued in Chapter 12,
on climate change, Liberal Democrats do not argue that people should be prevented from flying or driving their cars, but rather that the true environmental
costs of their actions should be reflected in the price that they pay when they fly or drive.
Can anybody fathom the magnitude and depth
of harm galamsey has
cost the Republic
of Ghana in terms
of human resource abuses, land degradation, evil consequences
on farming, water pollution and evil
climate change (s).
«Higher temperatures and
changes in precipitation result in pressure
on yields from important crops in much
of the world,» says IFPRI agricultural economist Gerald Nelson, an author
of the report, «
Climate Change, Agriculture, and Food Security: Impacts and
Costs of Adaptation to 2050».
Much
of USDA's
climate change communication focuses on risk management practices that improve production and reduce costs, said William Hohenstein, director of the Climate Change Program Office at USDA's Office of the Chief Eco
climate change communication focuses on risk management practices that improve production and reduce costs, said William Hohenstein, director of the Climate Change Program Office at USDA's Office of the Chief Econ
change communication focuses
on risk management practices that improve production and reduce
costs, said William Hohenstein, director
of the
Climate Change Program Office at USDA's Office of the Chief Eco
Climate Change Program Office at USDA's Office of the Chief Econ
Change Program Office at USDA's Office
of the Chief Economist.
Offering his only
climate change policy prescription
of the evening, he added, «That's why I'm going to push to
change the way we manage our oil and coal resources, so that they better reflect the
costs they impose
on taxpayers and our planet.»
No matter what mechanism the United States ultimately decides to employ in addressing
climate change, it must be implemented in a way that minimizes
costs and recognizes the impacts
on different regions
of the country, like my home state
of West Virginia.
Even
climate change negotiations can be thought
of as a prisoner's dilemma: no country wants to pay the
cost of cutting emissions (keep shtum) if everyone else is going to keep
on emitting (snitch).
High confidence in the reliability
of fire prediction is lacking today, even as Western drought and the effects
of climate change drive up the total acres burned nationwide and also the average size
of each fire, ballooning the number
of on - call U.S. Forest Service firefighters and the total
costs to battle the flames.
For example, a large body
of research has found switching to an entirely vegetarian diet would make a huge difference
on the carbon footprint
of our food system — the
Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security research program reports that if the global population were to reduce or cut its meat intake, it would halve the
cost of mitigation actions needed to stabilize carbon dioxide levels to 450 parts per million by midcentury — but for many people that is not in the cards.
Things might be different if Virginia had acted
on the shelved 2008
climate action plan, which called for state agencies to educate residents about causes and impacts
of climate change and
costs of taking action.
7It is particularly ironic that Lomborg would offer such a ridiculously precise estimate
of the
cost of the impacts
of climate change from carbon dioxide emissions, inasmuch as the entire thrust
of his books chapter
on «global warming» is that practically nothing about the effects
of greenhouse gases is known with certainty.
Yet at this forum, an
on - campus debate at the Massachusetts Institute
of Technology over whether the university should divest the fossil fuel holdings within its $ 11 billion endowment, might not have happened if market forces properly priced the economic and environmental
costs of climate change, a theme that Anthony Cortese, the event moderator, alluded to at the outset.
But the transformation towards a sustainable future not only includes a rapid response to
climate change — now more than ever we need systemic approaches that can bring integrated solutions with multiple benefits and reduced
costs,
on climate change as well as other areas
of sustainable development.
«I do think there's an opportunity, if the president chooses to take it, to show leadership and get attention
on the
cost that
climate change is likely to cause,» says Kevin Kennedy, who heads the US
climate initiative
of the World Resources Institute in Washington DC.
(8) Under Article 4
of the United Nations Framework Convention
on Climate Change, developed country parties, including the United States, committed to «assist the developing country parties that are particularly vulnerable to the adverse effects of climate change in meeting costs of adaptation to those adverse effects&
Climate Change, developed country parties, including the United States, committed to «assist the developing country parties that are particularly vulnerable to the adverse effects of climate change in meeting costs of adaptation to those adverse effects&r
Change, developed country parties, including the United States, committed to «assist the developing country parties that are particularly vulnerable to the adverse effects
of climate change in meeting costs of adaptation to those adverse effects&
climate change in meeting costs of adaptation to those adverse effects&r
change in meeting
costs of adaptation to those adverse effects».
This curve is derived from
cost and supply estimates from the latest UN IPCC
climate change report and from analyses
of the scientific literature
on GGR (using midpoint estimates where
cost / supply ranges were presented) performed by the Virgin Earth Challenge (VEC) team:
Note that the last remark can go either way, as the solar signal can even be more enhanced at the
cost of the sensitivity for the greenhouse signal... And from Hansen ea.: «Solar irradiance
change has a strong spectral dependence [Lean, 2000], and resulting
climate changes may include indirect effects
of induced ozone
change [RFCR; Haigh, 1999; Shindell et al., 1999a] and conceivably even cosmic ray effects
on clouds [Dickinson, 1975].
James A. Edmonds • Member, IPCC Steering Committee
on «New Integrated Scenarios» (2006 - present) • Lead Author, Working Group III, «Framing Issues,» IPCC Fourth Assessment Report (2007) • Lead Author, Working Group III, «Global, Regional, and National
Costs and Ancillary Benefits
of Mitigation,» IPCC Third Assessment Report (2001) • Lead Author, Working Group III, «Decision - Making Frameworks,» IPCC Third Assessment Report (2001) • Lead Author, Working Group III, Summary for Policy Makers, IPCC Third Assessment Report (2001) • Lead Author, Working Group II, «Energy Supply Mitigation Options,» IPCC Second Assessment Report (1996) • Lead Author, Working Group II, «Mitigation: Cross-Sectoral and Other Issues,» IPCC Second Assessment Report (1996) • Lead Author, Working Group III, «Estimating the
Costs of Mitigating Greenhouse Gases,» IPCC Second Assessment Report (1996) • Lead Author, Working Group III, «A Review
of Mitigation
Cost Studies,» IPCC Second Assessment Report (1996) • Lead Author, Working Group III, «Integrated Assessment
of Climate Change: An Overview and Comparison
of Approaches and Results,» IPCC Second Assessment Report (1996) • Lead Author, IPCC Special Report,
Climate Change 1994: Radiative Forcing
of Climate Change and An Evaluation
of the IPCC IS92 Emission Scenarios (1994) • Lead Author, IPCC Special Report,
Climate Change 1992: The Supplementary Report to the IPCC Scientific Assessment (1992) • Major contributor, IPCC First Assessment Report, Working Group III, Response Strategies Working Group (1991).
«Programs or policies that help reduce the
cost and difficulty
of making long - term
changes or that bring in whole communities to make long - term
changes together can help support people to take big steps that have a meaningful impact
on the
climate.»
Re the
cost of flying, there are lots
of assumptions around because
of different ways
of using or ignoring a 1999 report
on aviation's role in global warming [Aviation and the Global Atmosphere] for the Intergovernmental Panel
on Climate Change — the effects
of flying are much worse than would be predicted by just burning the oil.
If your corporation believes in a bottom - up,
cost - effective approach to financing nature for positive impact, join us
on our worldwide tour to debut the Shared Value Platform, launching in Paris at the United Nations Conference
on Climate Change at the end
of November 2015.
Joydeep Gupta, editor
of indiaclimatedialogue.net and a co-author
on the report, said: «Given that India is ranked the second most vulnerable to the economic
costs of climate change, only a strong global deal can generate the finance to avert disaster.
The book provides historical background
on climate change, introduces the work
of climatologists, and describes the many
costs associated with rising oceans.
[It] provides historical background
on climate change, introduces the work
of climatologists, and describes the many
costs associated with rising oceans.
Climate change, recipes, animal feed, real estate, building the perfect power desk, fluctuations in the
cost of metal, and
on, and
on, and
on, each weigh upon each other in an economy
of objects.
A few things are unequivocal, perhaps (doubling from the present concentration
of CO2 will take 140 years [give or take]; the idea that the
changes in
climate since 1880 have been in the aggregate beneficial; it takes more energy to vaporize a kg
of water than to raise its temperature by 1K; ignoring the energy
cost of water and latent heat transport [in the hydrologic cycle] leads to equilibrium calculations overestimating the
climate sensitivity), but most are propositions that I think need more research, but can't be refuted
on present evidence.
For this reason, a European project was estaqblished in 2011,
COST - action TOSCA (Towards a more complete assessment
of the impact
of solar variability
on the Earth's
climate), whose objective is to provide a better understanding
of the «hotly debated role
of the Sun in
climate change» (not really in the scientific fora, but more in the general public discourse).
Carol M. Browner, the new White House coordinator for
climate and energy, is a seasoned environmental regulator and campaigner who has focused
on cap - and - trade legislation, which would steadily raise the
cost of unfettered fossil - fuel use, and rule - making as driving the necessary
change (as they did with the 20th - century basket
of air pollutants).
In 2005, the Intergovernmental Panel
on Climate Change published a report
on carbon dioxide capture and storage that was enthusiastic about the possibilities
of such technology, but downbeat
on prospects for adoption given the
cost.
Judge William Alsup had requested this tutorial to bring him up to speed
on the fundamental science before proceedings begin in earnest in a case brought by the cities
of San Francisco and Oakland,
on behalf
of the people
of California, against a group
of major fossil fuel companies, addressing the
costs of climate change caused, they argue, by products those companies have sold.
by Deborah McNamara
on August 1, 2014 0
climate change economy and
climate change Global Warming the
cost of inaction
For a stark example
of the
costs attending business as usual, read the following «Your Dot» contribution from Elizabeth Hadly, a Stanford University biologist who's been doing field work in Nepal's Himalayan highlands focused
on the impact
of climate change on small mammals.
The destruction
of mountains, streams, rivers and groundwater, the destruction
of land laid waste by strip - mining, the loss
of wildlife in these areas, the human illnesses and premature deaths that result from these practices especially in Appalachia, the CO2 emissions and resulting
climate change along with the havoc this causes — all
of these are externalities that do not enter into the price companies pay to mine the stuff or the
costs we pay to turn
on the a.c.
If we're going to address
climate change, it's going to start with solutions experts agree
on (efficiency, low - GHG sources such as nuclear, carbon capture and storage, wind, geothermal, cellulosic biofuels, and eventually solar), and processes that experts agree
on (increasing the
cost of GHG emissions, funding more R&D, mandates sometimes).
Time is not
on our side and we are going to see the consequences
of climate change faster than predicted by scientists at the
cost of mankind.