Sentences with phrase «on ffp»

Jeff and I are working hard on FFP 2.0 and plan to release it at the end of next month!

A lot of Arsenal's recent transfer activity has been a calculated gamble on the FFP rules being enforced.

The most important fact is that the threat of challenges exists is another step in increasing the pressure for all clubs to come into some sort of line on FFP.

Also on the FFP rules, it's funny how the reasoning behind essentially scrapping them was because the Premier League TV deal would have given English teams an advantage in the Champions League.

All I can see is that the line we were fed on FFP meant that Wenger could become one of the highest paid and longest serving managers while being under no pressure to win anything.

For more information on FFP in general, we refer you to our handy guide.

Ivan then talked about the new rules on FFP, and how it could actually help to make the smaller Premier League clubs become more competitive in the coming years.

With the easing on the FFP overspending rules by UEFA coming into effect when it does come.

I never mentioned anything about getting him, They could have easily sold off some of their players to finance that move and break even on the FFP rules.

Not exact matches

With its focus on packaging specialty cheeses destined for the deli sections of supermarkets, Wisconsin's Family Fresh Pack (FFP) has seen its business grow steadily for almost two decades.

I only hope he sees our lone striker quality for what it is though and tries to nab Falcao / Cavani on one of those dodgy FFP loans with a view to buy deals in the last few days.

Meanwhile the previous title holders Man City have been freed from the shackles of the FFP rules and have been making the most of it by splashing the cash on the likes of Raheem Sterling, Nicholas Otamendi and possibly Kevin De Bruyne.

Carlo Ancelotti may well have been forced to offload a player or two in order to aid the La Liga side's chances of adhering to UEFA's FFP (Financial Fair Play) guidelines having spent almost # 100m on the aforementioned Rodriguez as well as German midfielder Toni Kroos and Levante keeper Navas Keylor.

FFP has put a cap on external resources, that is why City Che Liv PSG Atletico and prob others are all looking into having bigger grounds.

Lastly Chelsea have one of the best youth development squads in the league, it is exactly how they avoid the FFP because they make so much player sales off young players not to mention there is a clause that money spent on youth development is exempt from analysis in the FFP

One of the key strategies of AFC during the last decade was the supposition that FFP would cut the legs out of both City and Chelsea which our board and most tellingly Wenger thought would «level the playing field» but it didn't and as many thought during this period FFP would either die on the vine or the big financial giants would find ways to bypass it.

Chelsea boss Mourinho recently whinged publicly about Manchester City spending # 28m on Wilfried Bony, despite having been hit with FFP sanctions last summer.

They do nt have the squad strength to compete on two fronts and they desperately need a top 4 finish to stabilise and keep FFP at bay.

Come on mate everyone knows our club has gone threw a transactional period that we will probably never see in our life time again football has changed since the billionaires have come in we had to make the changes no other manager could of kept us in the top four while we had to change our whole structure I'm not saying wenger is perfect he does fustrate us all sometimes but were in safe hands and were going in the right direction not that I know a lot about the ffp but something is happening and every year we seem to becoming in a stronger position to what wenger is trying to achieve for our club we all know this is wenger last contract and even if he win the cl or the epl he won't sign another contract it just fustrates me that the way people act sometimes our time is coming even wen wenger leaves we will still have hope that we can compete for honours lets just enjoy beign arsenal fans and what will be will be cause wen in a very stable position and that is all the hope I need that our time will come in the future COYG

The changing of the FFP rules by Uefa which will once again allow mega rich owners to pump shedloads of cash at their club could be disastrous for the Gunners, as our own man at the top Stan Kroenke has proved himself reluctant to spend a single cent of his own money on Arsenal.

With the original FFP rules, we probably would have had the chance to close the gap on Manchester united without having to contend with the oil rich clubs too much.

welbeck will take tym rosicky is out, gibbs is making on every bench bcoz he is nt playing otherwise he would have been in same condition its just frustrating that wenger just ignore all this and keeping crying ffp... barca has signed more players than us even though they have transfer ban plus they won a treble... Ridiculous

Premier League giants Manchester City have previously felt the force of Uefa's FFP restrictions, with the club hit by a fine and a limit on numbers in their Champions League squad for this season.

Yes we owe the banks around 230 million it's a long term loan we pay back around 25 million a year, this season 2014/15 we ar going to turn ower around 330 + million And our outgoing is going to be around 220 million or less, this season and the next 5 seasons we will be malikng around 110 million profit a year, we had 170million in the bank in April which was confirmed by the club we have spent some money on players 70 + million leaves you with 100 million in the bank then in June we recived 3 new sponsership deal worth around 130 million (wether or not it was paid lump sump or spread across the season to lower profit margin that I haven't looked at) all in all we can spend ready cash ower 200 milion if we realy want we can spend double and more of that sum and we still be within the FFP rules becouse they look at accounts 3 years acumalation

Normally, with the amount of money available to them, getting a player from the French champions would only be possible for Arsenal if they were keen on selling, but it seems as though the FFP rules and sanctions from UEFA may be starting to bite on PSG a little bit, which may be why the manager Laurent Bland has revealed, in a Metro report, that there is little he can do to stop the club selling Rabiot.

and why can a country buy a player then to loan them on the cheap to their football clubs so not to be punished under the rule of FFP

I didn't even expect them to even do anything to PSG, so even a financial penalty would be surprising but if they smacked them witha CL suspension I would actually believe that FFP is something more than a way for the rich clubs to stay on top.

If FFP ever got their act together and didn't allow loopholes in their laws then Arsenal could compete on slightly more even grounds.

but still run perfectly on our awesome club philosophy of self sustaining we would have a combined effort of # 20 + billion worth of owners backing us up in wealth proportions that the same as city owners, its nice to know sometimes that we just have the financial clout behind us even if we choose not to use it, maybe between the three of them they could pay off the stadium debt leaving us debt free, and running of our own massive resources, this under the ffp guideline is completely fine to do as it stadium expenditure and not directly investing in to the first team.

City have them on bonus related contracts because of FFP.

On the subject of FFP Wenger needs to realise that bringing in these big players does also bring in a lot of revenue as MU are finding out with Falcao, so that offsets the cost somewhat.

PSG are also keen on Pogba and City know that any big money move would have to be balanced with player sales so as to adhere to UEFA's FFP (Financial Fair Play) guidelines.

Well YES and NO now we have the FFP in place so it's even again in fact we should come on top becouse we have gone through the pain of building the next generation stadium and new lucrative sponsership unlike nearly all of the EPL clubs, my reason for AW to step aside is becouse his not upgrading his always trying to make do, we the Arsenal want to fight the war and not the battle.

Our gamble on a new stadium and FFP has backfired and now the club has come out publicly and admitted we can not compete for players with Europe's elite clubs.

From next year due to the puma deal and other commercial income, we could spent 100million a year on players and still comply with ffp.

No limit on funds, cheaper ticket yet have endless budget to blow any other team out of their league, FFP made redundant.

It's frustrating to know financially we are a top team at present we can for a season or two out spend any team in the world with FFP respected, fact that we don't come close to our true potential in spending is fast causing Arsenal to a downward spiral, Goonerbri Highbury44 I ask you knowing we have the means but chose not too spend are fans right to protest weather is in the grounds or on this site?

It is not down to Arsenal just to buy a player... the selling club has to a) want to sell b) agree a price and c) ensure they have someone else to replace who they are selling Additionally because of FFP and Home - Grown rules it does nt make sense to buy all your players and then suddenly you could get 2 - 3 major injuries and have to buy someone else but then cant because you have no monies or might have to sell someone to be able to do so So many people saying negative things and that we should just go and buy and yet at the same time why spend so much on someone when we could have got somebody else!

Pogba had been linked with a move from Juventus to PSG earlier on in the summer, with some taking his appearance in Paris as evidence that the move may be back on — but PSG are unlikely to be able to afford such an expensive move under FFP restrictions after a profligate summer.

Kroenke obviously is more passionate about his business doing well than the club doing well on the pitch... As a fan, (yeah, I know about FFP, etc, etc) Dangote might be more willing to open his coffers for the good of the club.

Give it 2 years and our finances will once again look FAR rosier than Chelsea's... but the relaxation of FFP probably means they'll also jump even further up in quality by going on a buying spree again...

This is going to be a problem for them over the next few seasons FFP means they can't spend ridiculous money anymore and there lack of home grown players means they have to waste some of there spend on players they might not Necessary want.

If it wasn't for FIFA FFP, I would think a move to Man City was on the cards, so we could go head - to - head with Chelsea for his signature.

For what I understand they don't, actually they are afraid of losing him on the free, and also with di maria, although both of the players are Great, they need to sell, if not the ffp will come for them in a year or two.

Paris Saint - Germain will meet with UEFA officials in Switzerland on Friday to discuss financial fair play (FFP) for the club, a source has told ESPN FC.

PSG didn't spend 400 mill on 2 players couldn't afford Mbappé that's the reason for the loan, so Pep is still talking shit.What I've read whether true or not, PSG will have to sell players to sign Mbappé to avoid FFP violations.As i said yesterday this is what i can't get my head around why City can keep spending when revenue to expenditure simply doesn't add up.

The French giants» ability to finance two massive deals like that is in question with regards to financial fair play (FFP), but Friday's meeting between PSG and UEFA should make the club's situation clearer on that front.

Also, you can place safe money on the fact that the Citizens will be spending much more than the last two seasons now that the FFP shackles are off.

Yet how can the club spend large sums on transfer fees and still abide by UEFA's Financial Fair Play (FFP) regulations?

Free - spending French giants Paris Saint - Germain are set to face UEFA sanctions for breaches of Financial Fair Play (FFP), according to a report by the Financial Times on Wednesday that claims PSG «overstated» sponsorship contracts to the tune of 200 million euros.