Sentences with phrase «on god ideas»

They have no monopoly on God ideas, shouldn't have told you anything at 16 that could be that immobilizing, and should think they will ever get something perfect.

Not exact matches

random is a mathematically sound idea where as god is a simple creation of some MAN from long ago to explain the unexplainable of the day... chaos theory is quantum physics 101 and is also based solely on the notion of random events... not to mention quantum uncertainty which is one of my favorites.

Mr. Hawking wins easy battles against uneducated (in science) religious persons, but taking his statement on perspective, He is based on assumptions with serious underlying problems, basically everything from mathematics, to the incompatibility of quantum mechanics and relativity, and the lack of proof and evidence for string theories, he is launching a very aggressive statement, probably his last effort on life to counter the anthropomorphic ideas of God, and this is very common in all scientists.

God, heaven, whatever... man's attempt to live forever because we refuse to settle for the idea we are an animal species on this one planet, and when we die, it all ends.

Neither I nor my colleagues were seeking to supply a secular expression of «moral community» that would supplant «a theological definition of the Church» (Bischoff), or promote a «society modeled on the idea of a city of God» (Marr).

Marion also says that the Christian metaphysicians relate to God too much on their own terms and on their own initiative; with this we come to one of the deepest ideas of the book.

After years of tormenting myself, I finally laid aside all my preconceived ideas and honestly sought God on the matter.

I am open to discussing ideas, though I don't appreciate anyone forcing their faith on me, whether that's God or the lack thereof.

I wonder how much we all push our idea of God on others?

It's sad that people who hate the idea of God have to come on to a belief blog and tease and put down people who love God.

Where exactly (to throw a log on the pyre) did mankind arrive at the idea that a «day» for God (in whatever form one chooses) equates to a «day» for thee and me?

But I would love to speak my peace about what I have learned in my faith with the church — but maybe God has «cut the strings on that idea»?

They are using the bible to affirm their own ideas about God, then imposing these ideas on God.

When I talk to God in prayer, I am talking to something deep within the fabric of my own being and asking for a better way, a better idea, and intuitive thought rather than to have some trivial thing of substance delivered to me on a platter.

It's the 0.001 % of them who hold rallies, blow themselves up, and go on television / radio (in the case of Fox News, start their own network) who HATE the fact that there are those of us out there who do not accept the idea of God or Jesus or Allah and think it is unacceptable.

They try to force their religious ideas on everyone else through legislation, like trying to force children to pray to the Christian god in school, force the teaching of creationism nonsense in the schools and denying a woman's right to choose.

I've also heard an interesting idea that Heaven and Hell are the same place, and whether you experience God's presence as unimaginable ecstasy or like diving into the sun is largely dependent on your own individual bent.

I'm hesitant to put limits on God — the idea that God intervening is what confuses me.

Speaking during an interview on Fox News, he said people have put forth the idea «that we can be good without God».

It amazes me how many people are on here mocking the idea of God, and mocking beliefs that others hold sacred.

With all the emphasis on creation or evolution coming out of the first few chapters of Genesis, we often miss some of the most important ideas about our humanity and how God created us (not physically, but spiritually and psychologically).

My assumption is that a book from God would dispel some of the ignorance of his followers who had totally false ideas of the earth they lived on.

If you really take on board the idea that God created all that is, including space and time, God's otherness must be absolute.

If we have an idea of what God is saying we're not paying attention to it, we're imposing our own agenda on it.

Exactly my point; if according to the Bible and Christ's words himself — that even the Son of God has no idea about the 2nd coming; I am now supposed to believe what men on earth say??!!!!! Seriously, how stupid are some people — these are the same people who claim they are religious elite!

«They do nt serve God have no idea who He is and do cut and paste on every post they do there is no one else.»

With the widespread loss of belief in God as law - giver, the idea of being morally bound or obliged — as if this or that verdict on your action hangs in the balance — loses its basic meaning, however much it might retain its compelling psychological effect.

When you turn the light of reason on the basic of idea of god needing a sacrifice of his own son to allow himself to forgive, it becomes just as ridiculous as condemning homosexuality.

In a time when stories were passed on verbally and people had no idea of how the world worked and so wanted their «god» to be bigger and better than the next man's god, the stories just got better and bigger and more far fetched.

Coupland ends up pushing back ever so gently on the idea that we can or should try to live without God.

Tom Wright, also on film, pointed out that the imago dei of Genesis 1:26, 27 had, as background, the idea of a god's image being placed in a temple.

As can be seen through comparative religion, no human philosopher or religious leader has ever invented the idea that God fully and freely accepts human beings without any effort or work on their part.

• After Germaine Greer said that freedom is the world's most dangerous idea, and sex columnist Dan Savage picked population control, newspaper columnist Peter (brother of Christopher) Hitchens declared on Australian TV that «the most dangerous idea in human history and philosophy remains the belief that Jesus Christ was the son of God and rose from the dead.»

While the overarching theme of the book is indeed the love of God and the security and freedom we find in it, each chapter really stands on its own with insightful and challenging reflections on ideas like «obscurity,» «resurrection,» and «wounds.»

He defends neither his version of the cosmological proof for God's existence, his unique twist on Leibniz» idea that God created the best of all possible worlds, nor his once - celebrated demonstrations of the soul's immortality.

The idea is rather that the desecration and desolation of the holy city were a part of God's judgment on the wicked and a trial of his saints as by fire (cf. Zech 13:8 - 9; Mal 3:1 - 4).

The focus of the Gifford Lectureship on natural theology rendered fully appropriate an expansion and enrichment of his previous work on the idea of God, although this remained a very small part of the total task he set himself.

It is based on the idea, central to Christianity, of the coming Kingdom of God and the second coming of Jesus Christ, and it involves an interpretation of what God requires of man.

It seems all of the questions progressivism answers are based on the idea that there's no God.

My definition of «church» has definitely changed over the years, and I find myself leaning more and more toward the idea that the true bride of Christ is a group of living breathing people — not a building, not an organization, not a set of doctrines, etc. — just people who continue on the path toward faith in God.

The Old Testament's early idea of man in his social relationships could be inferred on a priori grounds from the early Biblical idea of God.

It seems that the idea of an inclusive church where people are loved and valued based only on the fact that they are a unique creation of God is threatening to those who thing they alone hold the real truth.

On this basis, he fought tooth and nail against the moderates in the Southern Baptist Convention or any other part of the evangelical world who rejected the idea that the Bible was the Word of God in favor of the idea that the Bible became the Word of God in encounter or contained the Word of God in some way.

The idea that we are not human beings on a spiritual journey, but instead spiritual beings on a human journey, and we can sense and know all kinds of things about God through Jesus.

Religions have had millennia, yet there is still no consensus on even basic ideas like the number of gods that exist, much less any attributes they might have.

Then he said, «I have a hard time believing someday God's going to decide who gets into heaven or who goes to hell based on whether or not they believed the right thing about a few ideas.

Reinforcing in advance the claim I have put forth at the end of Part Two, Hartshorne went on to point out: «Just as the Stoics said the ideal was to have good will toward all but not in such fashion as to depend in any [221] degree for happiness upon their fortunes or misfortunes, so Christian theologians, who scarcely accepted this idea in their ethics, nevertheless adhered to it in characterizing God.»

There is for them only one God — he is holy, his land is holy, his nation is to be a holy people — and while the indiscriminate mixture of moral and ceremonial elements carries over old ideas even while it ventures into new ones, there is an evident elevation of the idea of holiness into terms of the divine majesty, and of the Most High's exclusive claim on man s devotion.

This «economic man», as he came to be called, could hardly be more distant from the Christian idea that human nature is based on gift — life received as a gift from God, love given freely to other men.

Oh, the Calvinists could make perfect sense of it all with a wave of a hand and a swift, confident explanation about how Zarmina had been born in sin and likely predestined to spend eternity in hell to the glory of an angry God (they called her a «vessel of destruction»); about how I should just be thankful to be spared the same fate since it's what I deserve anyway; about how the Asian tsunami was just another one of God's temper tantrums sent to remind us all of His rage at our sin; about how I need not worry because «there is not one maverick molecule in the universe» so every hurricane, every earthquake, every war, every execution, every transaction in the slave trade, every rape of a child is part of God's sovereign plan, even God's idea; about how my objections to this paradigm represented unrepentant pride and a capitulation to humanism that placed too much inherent value on my fellow human beings; about how my intuitive sense of love and morality and right and wrong is so corrupted by my sin nature I can not trust it.