The keynote speaker is Chief Justice Margaret H. Marshall who will speak
on Judicial Impartiality and the Marketplace: Property, Prosperity and the Rule of Law.
The impact of campaign contributions
on judicial impartiality, both real and perceived, is significant.
Not exact matches
It's also meant to ensure it doesn't «give the appearance of compromising
judicial impartiality and independence (including independence from the political process)» while keeping a judge from taking a position
on issues that might ultimately wind up before the courts, he argues in the memo.
This is precisely the sort of attack
on the
impartiality of the judiciary that defenders of
judicial independence such as me loathe and rise to condemn.
Second, for a strong jurisprudential inquiry into
impartiality, the relevant differences between civil and common law judges, the nature of adjudication and law, and the justification for positive legal restrictions on judges» conduct, see W. Bradley Wendel, Impartiality in Judicial Ethics: A Jurisprudential Analysis, 22 Notre Dame J.L. E
impartiality, the relevant differences between civil and common law judges, the nature of adjudication and law, and the justification for positive legal restrictions
on judges» conduct, see W. Bradley Wendel,
Impartiality in Judicial Ethics: A Jurisprudential Analysis, 22 Notre Dame J.L. E
Impartiality in
Judicial Ethics: A Jurisprudential Analysis, 22 Notre Dame J.L. Ethics & Pub.
Kear - Jodoin J. applied correctness
on the basis (at para. 11) that bias is a question of general law of central importance to the legal system — one of the Dunsmuir categories that calls for correctness review — and commented by way of explanation: «
Judicial impartiality is pivotal to the integrity of our legal system» (at para. 13).
In this case, the Board could participate without compromising the principles of finality and
impartiality (at paras. 60 - 62) and, although Rothstein J. sounded a «note of caution» about the Board's suggestion that even if it lost
on judicial review it would reach the same result in fresh proceedings, he felt «the Board generally acted in such a way as to present helpful argument in an adversarial but respectful manner» (at para. 72).
But, while the mediation of courts is based upon the principle of
judicial impartiality, disinterestedness, and fairness pervading the whole system of judicature, so that courts may as near as possible be above suspicion, there is,
on the other side, an important issue at stake: that is, that causes may not be unfairly prejudiced, unduly delayed, or discontent created through unfounded charges of prejudice or unfairness made against the judge in the trial of a cause...
Justice Antonin Scalia's majority opinion stated the rule was not «narrowly tailored» to preserve
judicial impartiality because it focused
on issues instead of
on particular litigants.
It's completely arrogant and ridiculous for lawyers to suggest that a non-lawyer journalist and the public in general can't understand the issues surrounding
judicial impartiality and take a view
on them.
He has defended a Spanish company in two high - value arbitration cases for the acquisition of a Brazilian group of companies, winning damages over the sellers» contractual liability, who further sought vacatur of the awards in
judicial proceedings in New York
on the grounds of lack of
impartiality of the President of the Arbitral Tribunal.
BUT — I can think of at least one commenter
on Pink Tape who makes valuable contributions from time to time but does so anonymously in order not to compromise his / her
judicial impartiality, and at least one commenter
on Pink Tape who does so quite openly, drawing
on judicial experience to back up opinion.