In a post
on her Living Proof Ministries blog about Matthew Warren's suicide, Moore first explained her anger at the «satanic force» that would prey on weak children.
Not exact matches
For
proof of this issue's timelessness, peruse this 1990 article about a famous magazine piece, «Gate Receipts and Glory,» that decried the pernicious effects of moneyed sports
on academic
life — in 1938.
ChainLink won the Innotribe Industry Challenge 2016 and are working with SWIFT to produce a
Proof of Concept (PoC) that will be demonstrated
live at SIBOS (SWIFT's annual conference) which starts next week
on the 16th.
He said that the new Blackberry smartphone will be ultra secure, IP67 - rated for water and dust
proofing and offer a long 26 - hour battery
life on moderate to heavy usage.
Surprisingly, or not surprisingly, cowboy nation is
proof to
live up to the Wild West history, with Texas and Montana charity some of the most loose positions
on cryptocurrency in all of the United States.
Mr. Hawking wins easy battles against uneducated (in science) religious persons, but taking his statement
on perspective, He is based
on assumptions with serious underlying problems, basically everything from mathematics, to the incompatibility of quantum mechanics and relativity, and the lack of
proof and evidence for string theories, he is launching a very aggressive statement, probably his last effort
on life to counter the anthropomorphic ideas of God, and this is very common in all scientists.
@ jack3 no you have the right to believe what ever you want, but we might mock you for believing in something that has talking snakes, a story about the world flooding and being able to fit all the animals
on the planet
on one boat, that believes in magic, that believes a person
lived in the belly of a whale, and that people coexisted with dinosaurs all without any actual
proof.
on the topic of
proof — we atheists need not prove the lack of existence of something that has no impact
on our daily
lives, however those that believe based purely
on the idea of somethings existence is a bit disconcerting!
I am waiting for
proof before I spend even one precious second of my
life here
on earth pondering if a god does or does not exist.
@Dave The
proof is all around us, do you look up into the sky and be greatful for the great gas ball is in the sky and your whole
life is based
on random chance.
You are so prepared to believe all of this without any physical
proof and yet you are happy to discount a physical, observable, analyzable fossil record that shows a consistent and worldwide evolution of
life on Earth dating back to about 3,500,000,000 years ago.
There will always be someone trying to prove the Bible is not true, but for those of us who have seen the work of God, who truly believe in him, it doesn't really matter what science says, or what they can «prove» to be false about God or the Bible, what God has done in my
life and keeps
on doing is
proof enough to know He exists.
historical Jesus, lmfao... show me any historical evidence of jesus... let's start with his remains... they don't exist - your explanation, he rose to the heavens... historical evidence - no remains, no
proof of existence (not a disproof either, just not a
proof)... then let's start with other historians writing about the
life of Jesus around his time or shortly after, as outside neutral observers... that doesn't exist either (not a disproof again, just not a
proof)... we can go
on and
on... the fact is, there is not a single proving evidence of Jesus's
life in an historical context... there is no existence of Jesus in a scientific context either (virgin birth... riiiiiight)... it is just written in a book, and stuck in your head... you have a right to believe in what you must... just don't base it
on history or science... you believe because you do... it is your right... but try not to put reason into your faith; that's when you start sounding unreasonable, borderline crazy...
The existence of
life on this planet is not
proof that a god created it.
We have no
proof, no evidence, that any of the billions of other planets have
life on them.
Science clearly disproves some aspects of the bible, and some takes
on evolution but the bible never claimed to be a «scientific
proof for the existence of God» it was meant as a blueprint for how to
live so that you may experience God directly.
I give to you what I give to no one else, and that is my seed, my procreative power, which, united to your seed, can incarnate our love, take
on flesh that will be the
living fruit of our love, the
proof also that we want our love to be a gift to God and to the future.1 I have expanded
on this at length elsewhere.2 Holding to our present topic, let us look a bit more closely at those issues of justice involved in this divine plan of the union of man and woman in marriage.
Provide
proof we die off and don't
live on.
The fact that your entire
life plan furnishes positive
proof that you have unreservedly risked everything you are and have
on the adventure of survival after death in the pursuit of the hope of finding the God of eternity, whose presence you have foretasted in time.
Until someone can create a single bit of matter and a single
living cell, out of nothing, the onus / burden of
proof is
on atheists!
After all how is the
proof of highly intelligent
life in the form of whales, ravens, octopi, or other primates put an end to religion here
on earth?
There is more substance and
proof corroborating the Christian and Bible account of existence then there is for any other «theory
on life» out there.
GAW: There is no such thing as a true atheist... What you can't take with you after this
life, and the faith therein is
proof enough for me and good enough reason for anyone's conversion, even yours,
on your last day.
While acknowledging that we can not safety -
proof the
lives of our children and that no one can resist the pull of Providence, we must question a sport which
on a regular basis calls its players to pay the ultimate cost for their participation.
They are: implicit obedience to the will of God («
living on every word that God utters»), trust in God which asks no
proof («You shall not put the Lord your God to the test.»)
So as you
live your
life by empirical
proof as you wish — as if you can depend
on your eye sight and memory as imperfect as they are — remember each one of us will give account for what they have done in this
life.
He went
on to say, «if the
proof of a theology is in its preaching, Bultmann's understanding of the proclamation of Christ crucified and risen as a summons to men to die to the world with Christ in order to
live unto God is near the heart of the true evangel.
Bonhoeffer argues for these and other positions below
on the basis of a natural -
life motif intermingled with Scripture
proof.
According to Gareth Nelson, «evidence, or
proof, of origins — of the universe, of
life, of all the major groups of
life, of all the minor groups of
life, indeed of all the species is weak or nonexistent when measured
on an absolute scale.»
Perhaps, though, the biblical character of Jesus, rather than being entirely mythical, was based
on one of many Jewish messiah claimants who had followers who euhemerized his
life to a greater extent than those of other such claimants, so that in time the stories were so embellished that he became a god in them, but the Tesimonium Flavianum is hardly
proof of his existence.
We have 10,000 + years of evidence and observation of worship from intelligent
life here
on earth towards a supernatural which you toss without
proof.
I know that the burden of
proof lies upon me to show how my thesis fits with Scripture, but I am beginning to think that the real burden of
proof lies upon those who want to maintain that God is violent despite all the evidence to the contrary in the
life, ministry, and teachings of Jesus Christ, and especially in what He did for the entire world
on the cross.
Reinhold Niebuhr wrote: «All the plausible and implausible
proofs for the immortality of the soul are efforts
on the part of the human mind to master and to control the consummation of
life.
Come to
Life through Faith in Jesus Finished work
on the cross to take away ALL SINS, his burial, which is the
proof of death, and his resurrected
Life on the third day.
I intuitively sense an Immanent, Benevolent Presence in my
life; but, of course spiritual experience is a subjective matter dependent
on many factors — temperamental tendencies that are genetically predisposed (not determined) and personal experiences, so I am not claiming my experience is any sort of empirical «
proof» for the existence of God that should convince others.
However, citing a number of
proof texts, he argues that the gift is conditional
on Israel's righteousness, one vital test of which is Israel's treatment of non-Israelites
living in the promised land.
Theists believe in a supernatural, invisable being with no plausible or credible
proof that he exists, they govern their whole
lives around a book written in the 1st century by unreliable sources who probably wern't eevn their at the time, thus its all hearsay.Theists believe in fairytales and base their
lives on wish thinking.Come
on!
if you base your
life on nothing but a thought (faith)-- a dream — really its more of a hope because the only «
proof» is after you die — so there really isn't any
proof of anything but a load of people telling others they are wrong and going to a place of torture because THEY think its real or vice versa!
There is
proof that
life, however it was sparked
on this planet, has evolved to what we are now, and continues to evolve.
So believers, produce your
proof, or admit that the beliefs you often claim are the most important thing in your
life are based
on pure bullsh!t.
@Donovan... I speak only for my experience and not to convert anyone... I study biochemistry, I work
on a membrane protein that requires
proof, it requires pictures of gels and actual empirical data... I have no problem with this fact based way of seeing
life...
The moment I realized I couldn't win a «
proof text» war with a slave - owner was the moment I realized that in discussions like these, we can't rely
on a few Bible verses pulled from their context — not when
lives are at stake.
Creationists arguement is many times this (as it seems to be the point you're driving at): Evolutionists only have theories
on how
life started, but creationists have
PROOF (the bible)!!
You have to provide some sort of solid
proof of that this intelligent creator 1) exists and 2) had a hand in creating
life on earth.
When he studied the
lives of those who gave themselves to the search for truth, he saw that they might be classified in four groups: the scholastic theologians, who proclaimed themselves the followers of reason and speculation; the Isma`ilis and other Shi`as who held that to reach truth one must have an infallible
living teacher, and that there always is such a teacher; the philosophers, who relied
on logical and rational
proofs; and the Sufis, who held that they, the chosen of God, could reach knowledge of Him directly in mystical insight and ecstasy.
When, in fact, we can think
on your carnal level (
proof... we have to revert back down to carnal interacting when we write anything to a non-believer), but prefer to think, believe and
live the way he trained us to do... through His spiritual teachings.
It implies that everyone play his part in the
life of the church and be prepared to carry
on whether or not there is any tangible
proof of results.
Miss Peperoncino 2000, discovered
on a festival poster, is
living proof enough that this style can actually look pretty sharp!
So, whether you are a long - time fan of these little nutritional powerhouses or this is the first time you hear about them, the chia seeds benefits are the
living proof that you can eat healthy without making any discounts
on flavour.
The dizzying variety of granola brands
on the grocery store shelves, and, depending
on where you
live, an equal number of locally and regionally - produced options to chose from, is
proof the media can not win this battle.