Sentences with phrase «on rem»

I haven't been well in recent times, as well as dealing with an on - going horrific personal family situation that became more than time - consuming, in moments of trying to find relaxation, you found me here on REM.

If this is the Mary P posting on REM, it speaks volumes but makes her / his postings seem even more pernicious.

You might want to peruse Carolyne's site some more or search her posts on REM, you'll be shocked to learn your 7 % is old news and much more.

Someone might like to take the opportunity to discuss such topics as this one on a new site advertised and promoted this week, on REM... they are looking for REALTORS (r) and others as well, to join a new networking group and the cost is affordable to all REALTORS (r)... (it's free — doesn't come cheaper than that to have a networking opportunity where you can post your blog about this topic if you wish, or address any other topic).

There have been some good articles posted on REM along with links to the actual hearing documents you can access.

A number of comments posted on REM's online Forum leading up to the Competition Bureau's announcement on February 8 that it was ceasing negotiations and seeking a formal tribunal hearing are highly critical of any negotiations regarding access to CREA's trademarked MLS system.

This is one of the best, if not «the» best, pieces of Realtor information / advice that has ever appeared on REM.

Here is the zucchini recipe link, previously on REM many months ago, for those who may have missed it: http://www.remonline.com/gourmet-cooking-for-real-estate-pros-a-different-kind-of-fry/

You are bang on and I encourage you both to share more frequently on REM.

The aforesaid represents the silliest logic I have ever read, on REM!

With an abundance of industry related historical background in addition to having other skill sets, both physical and mental, and the education to back up his sometimes philosophical approaches to various topics here on REM, he has a genuine heart for people.

This is one of the best discussions I have seen to date, on REM.

A story ran, recently, here on REM pertaining to an Ontario Superior Court Decision regarding a Seller's: Property Information Disclosure Statement (SPIS).

Note of interest: Because if your answer to question 5 is that you did not expect your own sales rep to bring his or her own buyer to you, it's no wonder homeowners think they can do it all themselves, if believing they are just hiring someone to write good ads and walk people through the house and or (as stated in a current post on REM), just give the public the keys to your house.

In my retrospective on REM's 100th issue, I wrote: «The Internet — really, nothing new here.

Share it on the REM Forum.

To Brian M: Based on your remarks on REM you would make a good real estate consultant for real estate consumers.

Although this announcement is on REM apparently both ROgers and Lawrence Dale have forgotten to notify TREB and RECO.

Thank you for your kindness and all your thoughtful posts on REM some of which generate posts by others due to your generous sharing.

Many independents still exist today, however I have noticed a number of mergers being announced recently (here on REM) that involve independents joining a major Franchised Brokerage.

As you have heard me say many times on REM: no pre-approval, written, signed by your bank or other provider, as to how much you quality to spend (not that this dictates what you do spend or even choose to look at) then I will not work for you, or even with you.

And my only lifeline to the rest of the world has been commenting on REM, and my REM Gourmet Cooking Column.

We all learn at least one new thing each day, and when you have posted on REM, we have learned from you, too.

As a follow up to my previous response to this article, I observed the following on REM's website, as I hadn't endeavoured to read this previously:

This is what happens when the very vast majority of Realtors does not pay attention to what is going on within its sales culture, does not care about anything other than the next commission cheque, does not read REM regularly, does not concern itself with pursuing anything more than the bare minimum of ongoing education requirements, does not care enough about what the majority of the public thinks about them, does not heed the warnings of professionals within the culture, does not heed the warnings of commenters on REM about this issue (over the past five years or so) and too often crosses its fingers when conducting double - enders, hoping that neither opposing parties to the transactions find out what was or was not said or revealed that should have been said or revealed.

It would be nice if those were posted on REM.

It gets tiresome listening to experts such that here on REM know everything better than everyone else:) when they don't.

We have also read anecdotal evidence on REM showing that some members have crossed the Agency line into an implied Agency, regarding how they have offered services in relation to «mere posting» listings, however this has probably transpired regarding other real estate related products and or situations.

However, as far as potentially having two or more separate identities on REM is concerned, I see that as a separate matter.

However, Ross also indicated that he has used others on REM but didn't divulge all of those identities.

However, when we consider other stories currently running on REM such as: «Winnipeg Broker David Douglas permanently banned» and the recent story out of Newfoundland involving Exit Realty on the Rock, one might fairly wonder if the other Provinces shouldn't be quick to follow British Columbia's lead.

And that is why no one addressed your issue as spelled out on REM.

Recent rumblings on REM suggest that Ontario is about to make some unique changes.

Open this link to read prior recipes on REM: http://www.remonline.com/home/?feed=rss2&cat=…

Of all the stories currently running on REM, this is arguably the most interesting one because of the significant nature of the initiative — it can potentially go to the heart of the matter, so to speak.

Needless to say, I've found more than a few of the comments on REM to be such that it has caused me to question the mentality and even the integrity of the contributor, and ache for this tortured Industry to think that such an individual could actually be licensed to trade in real estate.

Recently on REM we have seen two separate articles written by members, each of whom had their broker's licence, wherein they talked about the role of a Real Estate Professional, REALTOR, as it relates to putting deals together.

One of my closest friends on REM likes the expression «Creacrats» — I certainly understand the motivation for its creation.

Here on REM and in association directed «educational courses» for a few years using FB to power your business has been endorsed alongside google plus, myspace (remember that one) and dozens of others.

A recent posted comment to PED addressed thoughts on moving vans supplied by agents, among other systems the comment referred to as bribes... It's interesting that no one on the forum made any comments on this REM article a while back...

Take ideas you read on REM, and find a way to incorporate them into your own marketing.

Your point about how we're (industry members) hobbled when it comes to speaking up and out was valid, and I've actually spoken to that point recently on REM, as well.

What other venue to Canadian REALTORS who clearly are the engaged group here on REM have to post in a Forum a message to the president where he can respond.

We don't even practice the REALTOR «value added» script on REM.

Alan m., I have taken a moment to read your previous comments here on REM — it appears you spend much of your time writing your own beliefs her about what is wrong with what anyone and everyone else is doing.

You need look no further from the piece on REM from CREA's president to note that the open door he portrayed was promptly slammed in our faces once the questions were put to him and his minion who came to his defense.

There are encyclopaedic in length posts on REM relative to the goings on at that time, so any reader can easily avail themselves of pertinent information here on the forum.

While there has been much debate over the years on REM regarding the subject of «part - time» REALTOR's, when has a Managing Broker ever stated publicly how they ensure that a part - time REALTOR's business is covered through collaboration with a colleague?

In any event, most of what appears on REM would be of a nature that it really couldn't usually harm any identifiable group or segment of real estate practitioners.

John Van der Laarse got inside my head with his comment of the day when he posted on REM.