Sentences with phrase «on superintendent evaluation»

This session may not be necessary for participants who have attended Board Member Certification Courses (CBAs) 300 and 301, or who have documented participation in in - district workshops focused on superintendent evaluation conducted by MASB trainers.

The Board's action was based on recommendations from a Work Group on Superintendent Evaluation established by the Virginia Department of Education.

Not exact matches

The union is challenging recent state measures that allow superintendents to impose improvement plans on teachers who receive poor evaluation scores.

Southold School District Superintendent David Gamberg is criticizing Gov. Andrew Cuomo's plan to ratchet up the importance of student performance on state assessments when it comes to teacher evaluations.

The state aid increase should not have been tied to the governor's teacher evaluation proposal, which in turn should not be increasingly based on test scores, said David Gamberg, who is superintendent of both the Greenport and Southold districts.

That was a problem revealed last year when someone on the board leaked the individual evaluations, showing Seals Nevergold and Sharon Belton Cottman had problems with the superintendent.

Meanwhile, in school districts from Washington, D.C., to Los Angeles and Seattle, teacher unions and superintendents have clashed over the use of new evaluation systems that base compensation on student test scores.

According to the application, CORE based the evaluation framework on Greatness By Design, a report commissioned by Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Torlakson and developed by a task force co-chaired by Steinhauser that made recommendations on teacher effectiveness.

In a letter sent on behalf of some families Wednesday to L.A. Unified Superintendent John Deasy and the school board — and just before the district begins negotiations with the American Federation of Teachers» City of Angels unit over a new contract — Barnes & Thornburg's Kyle Kirwan demanded that the district «implement a comprehensive system» of evaluating teachers that ties «pupil progress» data to teacher evaluations.

Those high - performing schools did things like «set measurable goals on standards based tests and benchmark tests across all proficiency levels, grades, and subjects»; create school missions that were «future oriented,» with curricula and instruction designed to prepare students to succeed in a rigorous high - school curriculum; include improvement of student outcomes «as part of the evaluation of the superintendent, the principal, and the teachers»; and communicate to parents and students «their responsibility as well for student learning, including parent contracts, turning in homework, attending class, and asking for help when needed.»

The Marzano Causal Teacher Evaluation Model has been chosen by Washington's Superintendent of Public Instruction and Washington's Teacher / Principal Evaluation Pilot as one of three preferred evaluation models, not least because the focus of the model is squarely on teacher development and increased student acEvaluation Model has been chosen by Washington's Superintendent of Public Instruction and Washington's Teacher / Principal Evaluation Pilot as one of three preferred evaluation models, not least because the focus of the model is squarely on teacher development and increased student acEvaluation Pilot as one of three preferred evaluation models, not least because the focus of the model is squarely on teacher development and increased student acevaluation models, not least because the focus of the model is squarely on teacher development and increased student achievement.

Last month, State Superintendent Brian Whiston said if lawmakers don't act on the bill, he'd bring his own proposal to improve teacher evaluations across the state.

Leading up to the Senate Education Committee vote on April 28, the following groups turned in support for Click to add MIRS Bill Hound SB 0103 — the Michigan Association of School Administrators, Grand Rapids Public Schools, West Michigan Talent Triangle, the Michigan Association of School Boards, the National Heritage Academies, the South Central Education Policy Consortium, Michigan Association of Public School Academies, Great Lakes Education Project, Wayne County Regional Educational Service Agency, then - Dearborn Schools Superintendent Brian WHISTON and around 40 southeast Michigan school superintendents and Zimco and K - 12 Evaluation Solutions.

LAUSD Supt. John Deasy Faces Performance Evaluation by Teachers Union Barely two weeks after delivering a stinging no - confidence vote on the leadership of Superintendent John Deasy, the teachers union announced it will do a first - ever «performance evaluation» of the Los Angeles UnifEvaluation by Teachers Union Barely two weeks after delivering a stinging no - confidence vote on the leadership of Superintendent John Deasy, the teachers union announced it will do a first - ever «performance evaluation» of the Los Angeles Unifevaluation» of the Los Angeles Unified chief.

And during the academic year 2013 - 14, superintendents shall review the performance and evaluations of all teachers, selecting 25 percent of those who have shown effectiveness as demonstrated by proficiency on the teacher evaluation instrument and recommending them for 4 - year contracts to the local school board.

But if they want their names attached to the federal application with the chance of receiving more money, they will have to sign a memorandum of understanding stating that at least 51 percent of every teacher's evaluation will be based on student achievement, Superintendent of Public Instruction Tony Bennett told the state board.

The teacher - evaluation overhaul — which Mr. Reinhard said will affect districts regardless of whether they sign on to the Race to the Top plan — is a key reason that Montgomery County Superintendent Jerry Weast said he would not endorse the application.

Kingsland, blogging this year on the Education Week website, sparked controversy by challenging superintendents of struggling school districts to relinquish their systems instead of trying endless reforms: «Rid yourself of the notion that your current opinions on curriculum, teacher evaluation, technology, or anything else will be the foundation for dramatic gains in student achievement.

And it joined the state's superintendents association in questioning why there still hasn't been a progress report on the new evaluation system for principals and supervisors.

The new guidelines require ways to connect student - level data with college outcomes; evaluations that include tests for teachers, principals, school boards and superintendents; a focus on school overhauls; and the agreement of local teachers» unions.

As the LAUSD Board considers the parameters of the superintendent's evaluation, groups are encouraging an open process that includes a strong focus on student...

The law says that local superintendents get to determine which teachers fall into the 25 percent pool and put their names forth for consideration, as long as they've been working for three consecutive years and has shown proficiency on the teacher evaluation instrument.

As reported in today's CTMirror, it wasn't even two hours after Governor Malloy signed the «education reform» bill into law before the three groups representing the school superintendents, principals and school boards went back on their word, claiming that the new law gave them the right to implement policies that student's standardized test scores can account for 50 percent of a teachers evaluation rather than the 22.5 percent that was listed in the draft bill and agreed to by all of the parties last January.

If the ruling made on Christmas Eve by the Public Employment Relations Board (PERB) stands, the district would have to stop the evaluation process, which was implemented in 2013 under former Superintendent John Deasy.

The initiative focuses on comprehensive overhaul of systems that contribute to student achievement, with individual teams led by assistant superintendents, the chief financial officer, the director of pupil services and the chief human resources officer — Joseph Pettiford — who is responsible for implementing hiring, onboarding, management, evaluation and professional learning processes designed to empower educator effectiveness and student performance.

The model recommends that 40 percent of a superintendent's evaluation be based on student academic progress, as determined by multiple measures of learning and achievement.

The reference document, Research Synthesis of Virginia Superintendent Evaluation Competencies and Standards, is also posted on this site.

LAUSD General Counsel David Holmquist told LA School Report that the guidelines issued by Superintendent Deasy on Friday do not prohibit school principals from making student progress count for less than 30 % of teacher evaluations.

Deasy joined Los Angeles Unified as deputy superintendent in August 2010 and went on a mission to overhaul teacher evaluations, a subject he knew from his previous job at the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

He is a 2006 graduate of a superintendent - training program funded by Broad, who favors teacher evaluations based on test scores.

On September 27, 2012, the Board of Education approved the revised document, Guidelines for Uniform Performance Standards and Evaluation Criteria for Superintendents.

Upon returning from my initial Hope Street Group training, I approached my superintendent and assistant superintendent about working on the state mandated plan for teacher evaluation.

Part 2: Superintendents and all Board members will meet to train on the following components of the School ADvance Evaluation model.

On May 17, the HSTA - HIDOE Joint Committee presented recommendations, approved by the Superintendent, to the Board of Education to remove student test scores [measured in the previous version of the evaluation system as median Student Growth Percentiles (SPG)-RSB- as required for teacher performance evaluation.

The comprehensive and transparent evaluations provided by SchoolWorks help the ISD superintendent to make informed decisions on operator selection and making recommendations to the NC State Board of Education for approval.

The improvement plan must recommend professional development opportunities and other actions designed to improve the rating of the superintendent on his / her next annual evaluation.

If teacher evaluations are going to be dependent, at least in part, on standardized test scores, then certainly superintendent evaluation should be dependent, at least in part, on how well they do handling standardized per unit expenditures.

This might require the central office to collect survey data on staff climate and parent engagement; it may require district administrators to attend and observe PLCs and school meetings; it may require the superintendent to endorse a modification to the teacher evaluation process, the master schedule, or the formal roles that teacher leaders can play.

However, if a superintendent is not rated as highly effective on one of these biennial evaluations, the superintendent must again be evaluated annually.

Last year, the Board of Education and the Superintendent agree to an evaluation process that was based on a variety of indicators and measures.

If a superintendent is rated as highly effective on three consecutive annual evaluations, the Board of Education may choose to conduct an evaluation biennially instead of annually.

The six superintendents have agreed on the evaluation criteria, in which student test scores would function as a check to see if a teacher's evaluation was consistent with students» performance.

post entitled, Speaking out for decoupling Common Core testing from the teacher evaluation process (Part 1), reported on the testimony of Madison Superintendent Thomas Scarice who laid out the reasons standardized test scores SHOULD NOT be part of teacher evaluation process.

He also represented the Rhode Island School Superintendents» Association on the state's Educator Evaluation Committee.

I served as the expert witness for the plaintiff's side, along with other witnesses including lawmakers (e.g., a state senator) and educators (e.g., teachers, superintendents) who made various (and very articulate) claims about the state's teacher evaluation system on the stand.

The proposed law directs superintendents to file tenure charges against teachers who receive two consecutive negative ratings on annual evaluations.

At its meeting yesterday the Kentucky Board of Education unanimously approved a new statewide evaluation system for teachers and principals and received an update on a new evaluation system for superintendents.

• a new district facility plan for the Hickman County School District • district facility plan amendments for Christian, Clark and McCracken County School Districts • 2013 - 14 Local District Tax Rates Levied • a waiver of 702 KAR 5:060, Section 6 (2) from the Fort Thomas Independent School District • site approval for the proposed new high school, Floyd County • school district indirect cost rates for fiscal year 2014 - 15 • the appointments to the Kentucky School for the Deaf Advisory Board of Christina Nymo - Yance, Debbie Haydon, Jennifer Harris, Sharon White, Michelle Gadberry, and Mike Lafavers • the appointment of former Graves County Superintendent Pete Galloway to fill an at - large seat on the Kentucky High School Athletic Association (KHSAA) Board of Control • proposed amendments to the KHSAA Bylaws • a request from Kenton County to use an alternative effectiveness and evaluation system

Olympia, WA: Washington Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction., similar to Massachusetts, will use set - aside funds and additional Title II, Part A dollars to develop, improve, or provide assistance to support the design and implementation of teacher and principal evaluation and support systems that are based on multiple measures of educator performance.

The state process involving school districts developing new teacher evaluation plans is more fluid than it originally appeared, based on extensive discussion on Monday, February 4, among State Department of Education officials, union leaders, school superintendents, principals, and other stakeholders.