Sentences with phrase «on a global scale then»

Now if we are talking about on a global scale then you are wrong.

If you wish to practice and spread the message of yoga on a global scale then register with Yoga Alliance validated Yoga programs in India.

So there is the first bit of information: If you do not believe that the climate is warming on a global scale then in terms of evolution you are less knowledgeable about your environment (less intelligent) then the great majority of animals, plants, insects, and even ocean dwelling single celled organisms like plankton.

Not exact matches

And then, we're going to launch our content on a global scale.

Then, after a brief interlude, these gods and others roused themselves for still another round of violence and bloodshed on a global scale that ended with Europe in ruins.

On a global scale, the heating of atmospheric molecules causes the lower atmosphere, or troposphere, to expand and stretch higher during the day; it then settles back down as it cools at night.

Such justification would then most likely center on whether, under the introductory phrase of GATT Article XX, a US carbon duty, emission credit requirement or other regulation on imports is applied on a variable scale that takes account of local conditions in foreign countries, including their own efforts to fight global warming and the level of economic development in developing countries.

Wellcoaches is dedicated to advancing the field of coaching in healthcare and wellness on a global scale as a means for personal transformation first for health professionals, and then for their clients.

Students will learn about globalization and then will be working collaboratively to research one problem affecting the world on a global scale, while simultaneously developing their writing proficiency.

If it's true that a global electricity system running on 100 % renewable energy really is possible, then almost every country in the world is going to have to significantly scale its renewable energy efforts.

Thinking about food waste, first on a global scale and then on a personal scale, embarrassed us all.

What this paper does is show that if one carefully considers the larger scale aspects of the monsoon including the oceanic monsoon (see some of the papers by Winston Chao a decade or so ago: thoroughly recommend) then one can start to see trends on a global basis.

Benjamin Sulman − a biologist at Indiana University, but then of the Princeton University Environmental Institute in the US − and colleagues report in Nature Climate Change that they have developed a new computer model to examine what really happens, on a global scale, when plants colonise the soil and start taking in moisture and carbon from the atmosphere.

A common theme in the debate is that since models can not make accurate predictions on regional and decadal scales, then they can not make accurate predictions on global or century scales.

On the bigger scale of things, then, taking carefully - selected bits of the temperature - record that are way too short to be anything but noise, and using them to try and pretend that global warming has stopped, is such a popular contrarian trick that we illustrated it with «The Escalator»:

Furthermore, the report by Kotlyakov (Variations of Snow and Ice in the past and at present on a Global and Regional Scale [1996]-RRB- referred to all glaciers outside the polar regions (not just in the Himalayas) and more importantly referred to 2350 — not 2035; and it specifically said glaciers will survive in the Himalayas even then.

Since then, Pachauri has raised the specter of large - scale population displacement and the existential threat that global warming poses to low - lying island nations, while arguing that large, industrializing countries such as China and India will not act on the issue before the Western world curbs its own greenhouse gas emissions.

In fact, if the quasi-periodic effects on global temperature are as strong as Tsonis proposes, then this would strongly suggest that the sensitivity of models is at present too low; and that the heating on the scale of the coming century is likely to be at the high end, or worse, of IPCC expectations.

It's tipping points like these that make climate change such a distinct problem: If we don't act quickly, and on a global scale, then the problem will literally become insoluble.

For both hemispheres combined, then, the addition of about 65 ppm of atmospheric CO2 concentration since 1979 has apparently had no overall effect on global - scale sea ice trends.

The index then compares these variables with the productivity of vegetation under changing climate on a global scale.

http://illconsidered.blogspot.com/2006/04/historically-co2-never-causes.html 100 years of shift does not factor into the larger scale phenomena http://illconsidered.blogspot.com/2006/01/one-hundred-years-is-not-enough.html Until climatologists can properly make models that reflect the entire global history and take into account plate position and how high the plates ride, oceanic levels due to this and the position of oceans, overall insolation, overall daylength and its effects on average global temperature and factor in known carbon dioxide levels over that time period, then they will be unable to give any correlation between current carbon dioxide levels and global temperature.

The hubbub was sparked when retired NOAA data scientist John Bates claimed in a blog post that his boss, then - director of the National Centers for Environmental Information Thomas Karl, «constantly had his «thumb on the scale» — in the documentation, scientific choices and release of datasets — in an effort to discredit the notion of a global warming hiatus» and rushed a study published in the journal Science before international climate negotiations.

You then asked «Or perhaps you can point me to the dataset that shows, for several individual locations for the same period as the temperature set the: * CO2 concentrations (OK, we could use Mauna Loa for that) * Aerosols (sorry, can't use global records for that, there can be huge differences on a local scale) * Absolute humidity * TSI with correction for local albedo, including cloud albedo, and the place on earth» Well actually, I can and have for the USA in terms of CO2, humidity (RH but AH also if you insist), and albedo, not to mention actual solar surface radiation, and various other variables (eg windspeed), as I have previously reported here for quite a few locations, eg Pt Barrow.

It is not surprising then that companies conclude that to be truly successful on a global scale they need to have a well thought out China strategy.

If you like management games, that is, games where you get to lord over a domain and specific actions, then Business Tycoon 2 wants to make you the next big corporation that earns money on a massive global scale.