Sentences with phrase «on a replacement cost basis at»

For the sake of simplicity, we'll assume that all of the property cited in the following examples is insured on a replacement cost basis at 100 % of its value (meaning no coinsurance applies).

Not exact matches

I had 10 % - based on replacement value of 134000 (THEY calculate on Replacement cost not value)- 2 % is one Option I was told - NOW after talking with ALLSTATE — WAS NOT AWARE IT WAS AT that level NOT really happy with my agent right now - I have now lowered it to 4 % and will pay 400.00 moreplacement value of 134000 (THEY calculate on Replacement cost not value)- 2 % is one Option I was told - NOW after talking with ALLSTATE — WAS NOT AWARE IT WAS AT that level NOT really happy with my agent right now - I have now lowered it to 4 % and will pay 400.00 moReplacement cost not value)- 2 % is one Option I was told - NOW after talking with ALLSTATE — WAS NOT AWARE IT WAS AT that level NOT really happy with my agent right now - I have now lowered it to 4 % and will pay 400.00 more per year

The unit cost of electricity based on Term Deposits at 3.5 % foregone over a 25 year life, including one battery replacement, works out at 55c / kWh.

An insurance policy clause that sets the value of covered property at the market rate rather than basing the value on actual cost or replacement cost.

The decision on whether to base your personal property coverage on replacement cost or actual cash value is always made at the time of application.

You are recommended to get familiar with the estimates based on the scope and together with the insurer to arrive at the replacement agreement in accordance with which the insurance company will pay you depending on how much it would cost to reimburse the rebuilding expenses with «like - kind - and - quality» materials.

By contrast, guaranteed replacement cost coverage pays out based on what a new item would cost to purchase at the time of the loss.

At Armour Insurance we work with you to try and obtain insurance that will provide payment based on the replacement cost of damaged or stolen property.

A replacement cost value policy reimburses you for your stuff based on how much it will cost to repair or replace the items at today's prices.

The replacement value reimbursement is based on how much it would cost to purchase the same product at today's market value.

Rebuilding your personal contents, or even worse, your home on an actual cash value or depreciated basis leaves you at a loss compared to replacement cost settlements.

Replacement cost coverage pays the actual costs to replace damaged or lost items, and ACV pays based on what the item was worth at the time of the loss.

It is good because your policy should be based on replacement costs, not on the value of the FL property at the time you purchased the online renters insurance protection.

A replacement value reimbursement is based on how much it would cost you to buy the same item, or one of equal value, at today's prices.

The replacement cost versus ACV is a bit trickier — you might want to upgrade your coverage from ACV to replacement cost as the ACV will cover you for the damaged item based on its cost at that time.

You can receive an actual cash reimbursement, which is based on the value of your property, or a replacement value reimbursement that is based on how much it would cost to buy the item at today's market value.

A replacement value reimbursement is based on how much it would cost to purchase the same or one of equal value at today's prices.

Such coverage is often worth the extra cost, he said, because standard coverage provides payments based on the depreciated value of an item or improvement while replacement cost coverage provides the amount needed to replace each covered item at today's prices.

However, the insured value at the time of the loss is usually required to be at least 80 % of the replacement cost before your policy is covered on a replacement cost basis.

A replacement value reimbursement is going to be based on how much it would cost to replace the item at today's cost.

You could also choose a replacement value reimbursement that is based on how much it would cost you to purchase the same item at today's prices.

Even if the insurance you chose to purchase was only based on actual cash value and not on replacement cost coverage, you still would be much better off than you would with no coverage at all if you lost everything in a catastrophic claim.

Today I would propose that the amount of insurance available to a stay at home mother should be based either on the amount of income she could be making, or the replacement cost of her stay at home services.

Another option would be replacement value reimbursement, which means you will receive a payout based on how much it would cost to purchase the same item or one of equal value at today's prices.

In other words, will the valuer - general's compensation be based on the market value and / or the replacement cost of the expropriated property; or will the so - called «public interest» outweigh and disregard the value of the expropriated property, including the surrounding market factors prevalent at the time of expropriation?