Sentences with phrase «on a risk adjusted basis over»

Not accounting for the dynamism of relative risks in asset classes means most investors underperform on a risk adjusted basis over the course of the cycle.

But no, I am happy for the present to attract individual investors who want to outperform on a risk adjusted basis over a 5 - year period.

The analysis reveals, Large Cap Mutual Funds underperform S&P BSE 100 on a risk adjusted basis over long term (analysis based on data from Jan» 91 - Feb» 17)

Not exact matches

Analysts use this five pillar evaluation to determine how they believe funds are likely to perform over the long term on a risk - adjusted basis.

The Lipper Fund Awards are based on the Lipper Ratings for Consistent Return, which is a risk - adjusted performance measure calculated over 36, 60 and 120 month periods.

For each fund category, like Large Growth or Moderate Allocation, the MFO Rating system divides funds into five groups or «quintiles» based on the risk adjusted return over selected evaluation periods.

To be sure, while focusing on factor and smart beta strategies has historically, over longer periods of time, earned higher risk - adjusted returns relative to the broader market, there have been stretches, even long ones, when factor - based approaches underperformed (think value during the 1990s), according to data accessible via Bloomberg.

Over the five years through July 2016, the fund subtracted value on a risk - adjusted basis.

Over the ten years through July 2016, the fund subtracted a significant amount of value on a risk - adjusted basis.

(While the performance of the fund itself is less important in the context of this discussion, it can be noted that over the evaluation interval the fund added a modest amount of value on a risk - adjusted basis, and so did the hypothetical portfolio that contained it.)

The rankings are based on risk adjusted return, specifically Martin ratio, over each full cycle.

In footnote # 15 of their study, Rodriguez and Tower commented on information this information from The Hulbert Financial Digest, saying «Wiener's Growth Portfolio performed better over the 10 years ending December 2006 on both a risk - adjusted and a non-risk-adjusted basis, that his other three portfolios.

You just put your money in the fund with the year that you anticipating needing to take the money out and the fund manager handles diversification and adjusting the risk appropriately over the life of the fund based on the remaining time horizon.

The Quantitative Rating is an extension of the Morningstar Analyst Rating for funds, which provides an analyst's forward - looking assessment of a fund's ability to outperform its peer group or a relevant benchmark on a risk - adjusted basis over a full market cycle.

The fund's ranking was based on its ability to provide superior consistency and risk - adjusted returns over a 10 - year period against a group of similar funds as of November 30, 2012.

The fund added a modest amount of value on a risk - adjusted basis, but did so mostly over only the past year or so.

Standard and Poor's research article «The Low Volatility Effect: A Comprehensive Look» references empirical evidence illustrating that low volatility investing outperforms the broad market on a risk - adjusted basis over the long term.

While the success of the diversified and rebalanced stock and bond portfolio relative to stocks on their own is not a revelation, many investors might be surprised at just how well this portfolio has done over the past 18 years on both an absolute and risk adjusted basis.

This strategy is based on the Fama - French Three Factor Model, which holds that small - cap and value stocks should deliver higher risk - adjusted returns over the very long term.

Over the last five years, the Columbia Seligman Communications and Information Fund delivered an unimpressive performance on a truly risk - adjusted basis.

In the U.S. market, both the S&P 500 ® Low Volatility Index and the S&P 500 Minimum Volatility Index have shown outperformance over the S&P 500, not just on a risk - adjusted basis, but also in absolute terms (see Exhibit 4 of Inside Low Volatility Indices).

Over the past 15 years under current management, the T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth fund delivered unimpressive results on a truly risk - adjusted basis.

The study by Morningstar Inc. found that, over the past three years, while about half of actively managed funds outperformed their respective Morningstar indexes — which cover the nine different Morningstar investment styles — only 37 % did on a risk -, size - and style - adjusted basis.

In 2004, TAF was voted by «Hedge Funds Review» as the «Best Performing Single Manager Fund» on a «Risk Adjusted Basis» over three years.

[1] The discovery of the «small cap risk premium» — over a 40 - year period to 1975 small cap stocks outperformed large cap stocks on a risk - adjusted returns basis — officially made size an investment factor.

Morgan Stanley defines that as a stock that will outperform the industry average over the next 12 - 18 months on a risk adjusted basis.

Over the past 10 years, the Columbia Dividend Income Fund failed to add value for its investors on a truly risk - adjusted basis.