Of course everyone including strikers should defend, but to depend
on a striker in that way is just ridiculous.
I think it will be smart of us if we instead of spending 25 millions
+ on a striker we spend that on some other department.
Spend that 30
mil on a striker — a position where sacrifices do need to be made.
However, they may be tempted to cash in
on the striker now while they are guaranteed a sizeable transfer fee.
If it is a fortune then best to keep money for new manager to use next
summer on a striker who is an upgrade on giroud.
Seriously, how many other top clubs would not
move on a striker that went 15 games without a goal last year?
I want to explain my
thoughts on a striker in a short, quick point: We currently do not have a top tier striker.
It make sense to give a shot to a goal scorer when he is scoring and you are
light on strikers.
When we've already out - scored just about every other team in the league whilst our defence continues to look average at best I don't want another penny
spent on a striker.
Why not spend some of the considerable cash we sit on,
on a striker who is not a project?
Following Bournemouth's almost - guaranteed promotion to the top flight, the vultures are already circling, with West Ham United
keen on striker Callum Wilson.
As per Sky: A bit more info
on the striker as we understand Arsenal made a # 29.3 m offer early in the summer and had no response from Lyon, which constitutes a rejection.West Ham also had a # 31m offer rejected in May.Lyon don't feel they have to sell Lacazette this summer as they received # 21m for Samuel Umtiti from Barcelona.
The next seven days are set to be interesting for Arsenal fans, even if there is no more developments
on the striker situation at Arsenal following the transfer snub from the Leicester City and England star Jamie Vardy.
Personally I can not see us spending another # 50m
on a striker when we have already just spent # 50m on sanchez and welbeck.
Arsenal can not spend #
40m on a striker so spending it on a defender is impossible.
All with f lol money compared to us, shi@ty little stadium, and wasting money
on a striker from a foreign Sunday league.
How can a so called top club like arsenal rely
on a striker so slow, that lacks mobility, dribbling, quick feet.
Got ta admit, we wasted money on Xhaka, why not spend the 30 + mil
on a striker of class early in the window before the price escalates, or that 17mil of perez plus 30 of xhaka and bid 50 for Lakaku, we still need a striker and the Sanchez experikent has to stop now its enough, I need more from ozil guys, I really do, ive always felt that, and I rate Coq over eleneny, xhaka, ramsey
I bet every coach in world football would love it to be just so simple — spend # 40M — #
75M on a striker and Bobs your uncle.
I think Milik from Ajax is more suited to make an impact in our team if we are going to take a
chance on a striker from the Eirdivisie with 23goals in 37app doesn't look great when compared to Jannsen but 7app were in the Europe where he 2 goals.
Arsenal's lack of options on the bench was worrying, as the manager
bought on striker Chuba Akpom and midfielder Kristoffer Olsson in place of Thomas Eisfeld and Isaac Hayden.
Mourinho responded to seeing his side fall behind by
throwing on striker Marcus Rashford for Chris Smalling.
There is no doubt that Belotti would offer Arsene Wenger another option to utilise in this team and I do think Arsenal need to
improve on the strikers we have available in our squad.
The Daily Mail says Atletico Madrid have put a # 50m price
tag on striker Falcao amid reports Chelsea are willing to offer Fernando Torres...