Sentences with phrase «on a total return basis over»

Not exact matches

While in office, he took revenues at the company from $ 1.2 billion to over $ 47 billion with a total shareholder return of 1632 %, or 15 % on an annualized basis.

Based on historical returns, if you start investing $ 100 per month today for the next 40 years (a total of $ 48,000 in out - of - pocket investment), you are estimated to have roughly over $ 600,000 in your portfolio.

These are the risk premiums over 10, 20 and 30 year time frames based on the annual returns for the total U.S. stock market (represented by the CRSP Total Market Index) and 20 Year Treasuries going back to total U.S. stock market (represented by the CRSP Total Market Index) and 20 Year Treasuries going back to Total Market Index) and 20 Year Treasuries going back to 1926:

Hamblin Watsa emphasizes a conservative value investment philosophy, seeking to invest assets on a total return basis, which includes realized and unrealized gains over the long - term.

Fairfax seeks to differentiate itself by combining disciplined underwriting with the investment of its assets on a total return basis, which Fairfax believes provides above - average returns over the long - term.

As of last week, the S&P 500 was priced to achieve an estimated average annual total return of just 5.83 % over the coming decade, based on our standard methodology.

We fully expect stocks to lose value over this horizon on a total return basis, given present valuations.

Since total return is comprised of income (via dividends or distributions) and capital gain, with the former counting much more over the long term, the case for this stock having a great 2018 is certainly already there based on that higher - than - average yield.

By contrast, an investor who put $ 100,000 into a portfolio comprised of 60 % stocks and 40 % bonds and left it alone would now have $ 214,080, based on the total returns of the S&P 500 and the Barclays bond index, over the same period.

Based on our standard methodology (elaborated in numerous prior weekly comments), we presently estimate that the S&P 500 is priced to achieve an average total return over the coming decade of just 3.15 % annually.

Based on the valuation measures most strongly correlated with actual subsequent total returns (and those correlations are near or above 90 %), we continue to estimate that the S&P 500 will achieve zero or negative nominal total returns over horizons of 8 years or less, and only about 2 % annually over the coming decade.

On the basis of valuation measures most tightly related to actual subsequent long - term market returns, we also estimate that the S&P 500 is likely to be lower 12 years from now, compared with current levels, though dividend income may push the total return just over zero on that horizoOn the basis of valuation measures most tightly related to actual subsequent long - term market returns, we also estimate that the S&P 500 is likely to be lower 12 years from now, compared with current levels, though dividend income may push the total return just over zero on that horizoon that horizon.

Based on particular strength in the precious metals market mid-last week, I reduced the exposure of the Strategic Total Return Fund in precious metals shares, from close to 18 % of assets down to just over 10 %.

A subscriber requested confirmation of the performance of a simple momentum strategy that each month selects the best performing debt mutual fund based on total return over the past three months.

SACEMS each month picks winners from the following set of exchange - traded funds (ETF) based on total returns over a fixed lookback interval:

We compare original (SACEMS Base) and modified (SACEMS Granular), each month picking winners from the above set of ETFs based on total returns over a fixed lookback interval.

This strategy each month picks winners from the following set of exchange - traded funds (ETF) based on total returns over a specified lookback interval:

The title for the post is based on the total return for the portfolios over the last 5 years.

These numbers further enhance the case for higher - yielding stocks over lower - yielding stocks based on total return.

However, the cash dividends paid out over the time period were $ 7.14, and on a total return basis, there was a net gain of $ 1.45 (+ $ 7.14 in cash dividends minus $ 5.69 in stock value decline).

Strategic Dividend Value is hedged at about half the value of its stock holdings, and Strategic Total Return continues to hold a duration of just over 3.5 years (meaning that a 100 basis point move in interest rates would be expected to impact Fund value by about 3.5 % on the basis of bond price fluctuations), with less than 10 % of assets in precious metals shares, and about 5 % of assets in utility shares.

‡ Lipper is an industry research firm whose rankings are based on total return performance, vary over time, and do not reflect the effects of sales charges.

If you look at periods where the price / peak earnings multiple was 16 or higher on the S&P 500, the final rate hike of a tightening cycle was actually associated with losses on an annualized total return basis, averaging -7.18 % over the following 6 months, -9.94 % over the following 12 months, and -5.87 % over the following 18 months.

The Lipper ratings are subject to change every month and are based on an equal - weight average of percentile ranks for the Total Return, Consistent Return and Expense metrics over three -, five -, 10 - year and overall periods.

BTW — On a total return basis versus the S&P 500, AVISX is +2.82 over ten years, +.56 over 5 years, +.69 over three and -3.90 over the last year.

Since total return is comprised of income (via dividends or distributions) and capital gain, with the former counting much more over the long term, the case for this stock having a great 2018 is certainly already there based on that higher - than - average yield.

Strategic Total Return has a duration of about 3 years in Treasury securities (meaning that a 100 basis point move in interest rates would be expected to affect Fund value by about 3 % on the basis of bond price fluctuations), just over 10 % of assets in precious metals shares, and about 5 % of assets in utility shares.

Perhaps even more interesting, is the fact that over the vast majority of the time they also outperformed the S&P 500 on a total return basis.

The index itself is down over 35 % year - to - date (it's down 28.75 % on a total return basis as of yesterday's close).

Based on returns for the asset class (not the funds), a Couch Potato that used the total bond market index would have earned at a compound annual rate of 9.27 percent over the last 30 years while one that used inflation - protected bonds would have earned at a compound rate of 9.24 percent.

M&M Mars Inc. (Boston, MA / Los Angeles, CA) 9/2003 — 5/2005 Region Sales Manager • Oversaw all aspects of both the Massachusetts and Los Angeles sales territory for the Mars Inc. brand Flavia, a gourmet, single cup office coffee system • Held responsibility for managing five independent distributor partners, five outside sales representatives, and two customer service representatives, ensuring client service, brand development, market penetration, and profit growth • Led the territory from inception in September of 2003 to $ 3.5 million territory for the calendar year 2005, utilizing a sales team that finished 2004 at 21 % over target and 36 % over target in 2005 • Earned award for territory profitability — based on return on total assets — in 2004, also achieving the ranking of the top territory nationwide based on sales growth and cost reduction

Utilizing the calculator function on this basis would indicate a total annualized rate of return of 30.85 % over the next two years.