Approximately all people have one particular point of view
on abortion matter.
Not exact matches
the person being voted for by these individuals probably does have the right scientific markings like, no God,
abortion on demand no
matter how late in term, good in business and stealing (er) expropriating for personal gain, cheating
on your mate, etc, etc. 2nd.
It is, furthermore, a
matter of calling the bluff of those who insist that the Catholic Church's teaching
on abortion, euthanasia, and marriage is a «sectarian» teaching that can not be «imposed»
on a pluralistic society.
Pro - Life / Pro-Choice No
matter where you stand
on abortion, find someone who holds the opposite view and is willing to have a conversation with you.
But if we put that
matter aside, and if our main interest lies in protecting the lives of our people, why do the mavens
on national security show no concern for the 1.2 million innocent human lives taken each year in
abortion?
The New York Times: Irish Poised to Revisit
Abortion Law
Abortion is back
on the agenda in Ireland after a European Court of Human Rights ruling last year found the state in violation of its own Constitution
on the
matter.
A barrage of such stuff, pouncing
on any scandal that could be dug up and chipping away at the pontificate of Pope Benedict, not to mention the usual stuff about the need to elect a pope who would change the «policy» of the Church over such
matters as
abortion, gay marriage and women priests, had been unleashed almost immediately, once Benedict had been congratulated for bringing the papacy into the 21st century by resigning.
The CNN debate opened with discussions
on economic issues, but later veered toward faith - based
matters like the role of religion in candidates» decision making,
abortion, gay marriage — and how the United States ought to treat Muslims living within its borders.
When we get hung up
on imposing our beliefs about
abortion and marriage, we loose focus
on what really
matters — Showing Christ's Love.
Aside from the obvious questions
on abortion, I was curious about whether members of these two organizations would differ substantially
on other
matters related to life and death.
The problem is when people start taking things that are fundamental to the Bible, like male / female duality and the preciousness of human life established in Genesis 1, and saying, «Eh, these things don't
matter,» and then go
on to support causes that contradict these foundational values (e.g., gay marriage,
abortion).
Agents of the state can teach your children how to have sex, give them condoms, put them
on the pill, give them the morning - after pill if it doesn't work, and take them off for an
abortion if that fails - and all without you having any say in the
matter or necessarily even knowing about it.
According to the ethics report, physicians objecting to
abortion or contraception must refer patients desiring such services to other providers (recommendation # 4); may not argue or advocate their views
on these
matters though they are required to provide prior notice to their patients of their moral commitments (recommendation # 3); and, in emergency cases or in situations that might negatively affect patient physical or mental health, they must actually provide contraception and / or perform
abortions (recommendation # 5, emphasis added).
But I would like to add that many of the reasons an «unwanted» pregnancy happens in the first place is due in large part to the same people who are against anything resembling
abortion... like opposing birth control pills, opposing any form of birth control at all for that
matter, opposing s - ex education, and so
on.
Listen I keep seeing bumper stickers like «you can't be both Catholic and pro-choice» these are not reflective of my faith, theser are slogans made for propaganda, I have 2 beautiful children and I have never been
on a position where
abortion could even play a part, but it is a legal option to the public at large; this being said even the bible calls for us to be good citizens, and to obey the law, I believe that this is a
matter that belongs with the family and not the state; no
matter how we criminalize
abortion, they will not stop, but people will go under - ground and more fatalities will occur, I rather see the government placing incentives
on more conseling for these expectant mothers and more outreach done at church levels, to reduce the debate to a single slogan is dangerous and will not accomplish the ultimately goal of preventing
abortions my two humble cents
A weak case can be made for permitting
abortions on the grounds that responsible people disagree
on the
matter.
Liberty and Sexuality is his account of how
abortion on demand came to enjoy the protection of the United States Constitution and of why Harry Blackmun's rationale for individual autonomy (especially in
matters sexual) should be retained and expanded.
Women have
abortions for numerous reasons but I guess saving their life doesn't
matter to you as long as you continue to step
on their rights to do as they wish with their own body.
I am not really picking a fight with Pete Spiliakos, but have less hope
on the
matter of arguing the
abortion question than he does.
I would suggest that it's due to an awakening to the real pain that promiscuity and
abortion entail; others might say that it's actually based in «rights talk,» that young people identify with aborted children (as of this January 22, anyone under the age of thirty could have been aborted) and see
abortion as an attack
on their siblings and classmates, rather than a
matter of women's self «determination.
«Just as Catholics for a Free Choice and other such groups suggest to the general public that not all Catholics agree with positions adopted by their bishops
on birth control,
abortion and in - vitro fertilization, so will the Religious Right serve to suggest that not all Catholics accept the positions of church leaders in social justice
matters,» writes Richard J. Dowling, executive director of the Maryland Catholic Conference.
The point of entry came through an essay by Paul Ramsey that had made a powerful and decisive impression
on me when I first began to think seriously about this
matter of
abortion more than forty years ago.
How can we develop a moral stand
on a debate that seems to be polarized by those who consider
abortion simply a
matter of private choice and those who support no legal
abortions save those very rare ones necessary to save a mother's life?
These judges had a demoralizing effect
on conservatives when they defected
on the
matter of
abortion, and Kennedy even more so as he advanced the case for gay rights along a path that surely led to same - sex marriage — as Justice Scalia clearly saw and sharply warned.
R. R. Reno has used the term dhimmi to describe the social status who hold the traditional line
on matters such as personhood, sexuality, and
abortion.
On matters of sexual morality, he is highly unlikely to change the course set by John Paul II and Benedict, opposing
abortion, same - sex marriage, and contraception.
He drew opprobrium from Democratic colleagues for calling
abortion «African - American genocide»
on the Assembly floor, and has proposed a «Blue Lives
Matter» law that would make assaulting a police officer a hate crime.
On the
matter of
abortion, the respondents certainly had a firmer grasp of the facts, and more solid ground for thoroughly formed views.
2014's Obvious Child, directed and written by Gillian Robespierre, focused
on subject
matter that many women can relate to but are rarely given the chance to see represented
on screen —
abortion.
Chistianity (Christian) Crossword Pack Christianity and Justice Christianity and Forgiveness Christianity and Capital Punishment Christianity and Human Rights Christian teachings
on moral duties and responsibilities Prisoners of Conscience
Abortion and Christians Christian beliefs about life after death Christian teachings
on moral duties and responsibilities
Matters of Life and Death Personal Beliefs Religious Studies Pope Francis Religious Icons Saul's Conversion The Good Samaritan The Prodigal Son Why Christians should help promote racial harmony
• study the information
on abortion; • review different views
on the
matter; • decide
on your particular point of view; • try to select proofs to support your opinion; • make up primary conclusions and further argument to rise.
And senators have demonstrated a reluctance to be satisfied with nominees» attempts to differentiate their personal views
on a
matter, like
abortion or gay rights, with their acceptance of the court's decisions in these areas as a
matter of law.
Moreover, based
on this evidence, Congress concluded that partial - birth / late - term
abortions are never medically necessary as a
matter of law.
«He is much more an Anti-federalist where state and national authority clash, more libertarian
on issues such as gun control, and much tighter
on some
matters as the rights of the criminally accused than I... «We, however, agree
on other important issues, such as finding no constitutional barrier to bans
on late term
abortions and requiring spousal and parental notification of impending
abortions.»