Law Society president, Robert Heslett's letter states: «The implications for the 3,600 businesses and the people employed by those businesses are stark, to say the least, and could have a knock on effect
on access to justice if any are forced to close as a result.»
Because two of the three legal aid sources are predominately supported by lawyers, decision makers should consider the potential impact
on access to justice if lawyers were to dramatically reduce their time / financial support of pro bono services and legal aid programs, which is likely as competition increases and the social contract under which lawyers and society have operated Vis a Vis the state sponsored monopoly continues to unwind.
Not exact matches
As regards
access to tertiary education, they are treated as
if they are international students who are required by immigration policy
to be self reliant and economically independent.9 South African social
justice policies focus primarily
on advancing the historically disadvantaged and such focus has an implication of excluding refugees from benefiting from socio - economic scheme.
Finally,
if you are looking for an article
to fire up your passion for the need for real and tangible action
on access to justice, I urge you
to read this article by Mitch Kowalski
on some of the shortcomings of the most recent CBA report
on the subject.
If the Legal Aid Agency is
to have a future it should be focused
on enabling
access to justice not refusing legal aid, says Jon Robins
Lord Jackson believes that BTE insurance is a beneficial product as an add -
on to a household insurance policy and
if his reforms relating
to a choice of solicitor were implemented BTE insurance would have an important role in promoting
access to justice.
The case was brought by the Public Law Project, a national legal charity that promotes
access to justice,
on the basis that the residence test would,
if implemented, violate fundamental constitutional rights guaranteed by the common law and the European Convention
on Human Rights, as incorporated into United Kingdom law by the Human Rights Act 1998.
They also wonder
if the legal profession isn't focusing its efforts
on civility
to the detriment of the larger issue of
access to justice.
If we were
to draw
on their collective wisdom
to tackle the issues of
access to justice with a multi-disciplinary approach, not only would we enhance the discussion, but we would also broaden the range of potential solutions
to issues identified.
LAG would suggest that,
if the government is serious about
access to justice it needs
to put back capacity into the system so that these people can get early advice
on their legal problems.
I've only just had a chance
to skim it, but in doing so I have noted a continuous thread throughout the report suggesting that it is essential,
if we are
to move forward effectively
on the issue of
access to justice, that we know what we know and what we don't yet know.
If the time is not reduced, the
access to justice problem will roll benightedly
on.
If we continue
to view
access to justice through an outdated lense that is fixated
on an ancient method of delivery, we are lost.
The Honourable Mr.
Justice Thomas Cromwell will open the Lectures
on Friday, speaking about the culture shift that is necessary
if the legal profession is
to get a handle
on ensuring
access to adjudication of disputes through the courts.
Combine that with another trend — younger and new lawyers coming
on stream tend
to establish their practices in larger communities — and a real
access to justice issue clearly begins
to emerge
if something were
to suddenly happen
to the lawyer practising
on her own.
It seems
to me that there are at least three principles that should be applied
to the design and drafting of legislation
on family law subjects
if access to justice is a goal worth pursuing:
On that side,
if you can learn how
to code, you can just build cool little tools that will support your practice, and solve
access to justice questions, or disrupt existing competitors, et cetera.
But before leaving the category of proceedings into which magistrates» court child support work falls: for the Legal Services Commission
if a lawyer should seek legal aid for his client in committal proceedings (CSA 1991 s 39A — 40) it is treated as «criminal proceedings» under
Access to Justice Act 1999, s 12 (2)(g) and Criminal Defence Service (General)(No 2) Regulations (SI 2001/1437) by application
on CDS14 and CDS15.
The Chief
Justice of British Columbia, Lance S.G. Finch, addressed a meeting of the B.C. Branch of the Canadian Bar Association recently on the subject of access to justice, singling out the high cost of legal services as a prominent, if not new, obstacle to tha
Justice of British Columbia, Lance S.G. Finch, addressed a meeting of the B.C. Branch of the Canadian Bar Association recently
on the subject of
access to justice, singling out the high cost of legal services as a prominent, if not new, obstacle to tha
justice, singling out the high cost of legal services as a prominent,
if not new, obstacle
to that goal.
If we're serious about
access to justice, then our focus should be
on reducing all of the inherent inefficiencies in the litigation process — not
to mention societal inequities generally — and not
on producing more lawyers who can't even afford their own services.
If the Ontario personal injury lawyers are successful in turning back the Wynne government's attack
on their profits — they might want
to reach out
to folks like Mr. Wright and finally get busy fighting for solutions
to blatantly obvious
access to justice problems rife in their turf.
Even
if it does, silver linings may be found in better
access to justice via intelligent machines, and a renewed focus of human lawyers
on expanding
access to justice.
Surely we must listen
to the judges who speak
to the public through their decisions
if there is
to be any hope of honest and meaningful dialogue
on all manner of
access to justice issues — including the cost of personal injury lawyers — including in the context of (not always «fair and reasonable») CFAs — and including all manner of alternative delivery structures — including ABS.
Think about what is facing us: the calls
to action, the future of articling — or
if not articling, what
to have in its place — the impact of technology
on legal practice, the
access to justice imperative, the experience of racialized members of the profession, mental health among lawyers and law students and so
on and so
on.
Lawtender believes, and itself warns, that U.S. citizens»
access to justice is a serious problem, although it's not sure
if ranking a subfactor of the WJP Index — something which the WJP didn't do in its report — is particularly scientific, especially when the data is based largely
on an online survey of 1002 people in New York, Los Angeles and Chicago.
As such,
if you really want
to improve public
access to justice in Surrey, the solution is not
to flood the Lower Mainland (a market in which law students already have a very difficult time finding articles - yes, even in Surrey) with junior lawyers but
to build a new courthouse
on the Surrey side of the river.
If one assumes that «
access to justice» and «
justice» are public goods that the state takes over as soon as it detects a legal dispute (e.g.,
on filing a Notice of Civil Claim), then one's perspective changes.
If the public and the legal profession can reach common ground
on the utility of LSRs, they have the potential
to increase
access to justice by providing tailored and affordable assistance when needed.
Please,
if you are still
on the wrong side of the rabbit hole — join your colleagues in re-imagining the value that lawyers can bring
to clients, re-establishing the credibility of the legal profession among ordinary Canadians, and re-commiting
to both the ideals and the reality of
access to justice.
If we are
to make good
on the Constitutional promise for equal
justice for all, we need
to work with our State Legislature, as Representatives MacEwen and Kilduff said,
to create much greater
access to civil legal services.
On the other side of the coin, one respondent highlighted that
if genuinely caring for the less fortunate «is not enough motivation, odds Pro Bono legal work is one the biggest assets the legal world has in providing «
access to justice» for all.
If we are
to address the twin crises of articling and
access to justice we must do so
on our own.
If there is growing weariness, I expect some of that is generated by those
on the frontlines who continue
to slog forward while waiting for those in governments and courts
to finish «exploring initiatives» and start funding and implementing initiatives that actually do increase
access to justice.
If you're not
on the frontlines but are getting tired of hearing the cries for
access to justice, you have a few options:
What
if law societies made it more economically feasible for lawyers
to work
on pro bono or in the
access to justice sector by providing practice fee rebates or credits?
What
if ethics committees were required
to consider the impact of proposed rule changes
on access to justice for those of middle and low socioeconomic status?
My personal view is that isn't a problem,
if at least some of the graduates are enabled
to go in directions that do have an impact
on access to justice.
Following up
on Department of
Justice Access to Justice Director Lisa Foster's recent speech, and my video
on «The Litigant Voice,» I had an idea about how we can all start
to think about, in Lisa Foster's words: What
if... Continue reading →
If not for her passion for court administration and
access to justice, she may have focused her energies
on impressions of the «before» scenes in infomercials about the difficulties of plastic wrap.
The calls
to action are instead geared toward developing
justice system innovations and applying direct and indirect political pressure
on governments
to better facilitate
if not provide equal
access to justice by 2030.
Also consider:
If the
on - line system provided supporting information and guidance through the dispute or payment process, would this enhance
access to justice for self - represented litigants?
If you have
access to it, an excellent paper by
Justice Sherr
on his approach
to focussed hearings is available from the National Judicial Institute in the materials for their 2014 Family Law Seminar.
In the Lam case, MacDonald put forward a Supreme Court of Canada decision — Hryniak v. Mauldin — that talks about proportionality, affordable
access to justice, and the fact these kind of summary trial rules should be given a broad latitude and
if a judge, in his or her discretion, feels they can grant judgment
on the evidence before them they should be allowed
to do so.
But what I can say is that is that
if we have reached the point that our
justice system is so broken that we have
to resort
to the incarceration of family litigants, based
on the subjective assessment of a single
justice who has clearly formed strong opinions about the culpability of the parties, we have a very big problem that should be alarming all
access to justice advocates.
His Honour Judge Hacon has made an important decision in respect of whether
to transfer proceedings out of the IPEC
on the basis that
if he did allow the transfer, then the Claimant's practical ability
to retain
access to justice would be hindered.
The Victorian Department of
Justice suggests that the Tribunal's Register could be better utilised and provide
access to greater levels of information
if s 199B was amended
to broaden the list of details that must be included
on the Tribunal's Register.