Having once before fallen for a â $ œNorth Pole is melting!â $ scam, even the New York Times — on its blog, mind you, no need to tamp down alarmism on its print pages â $ «admitted that the hyperventilated headline and lede â $ œgo way beyond what Mark Serreze of the National Snow and Ice Data Center tells the reporter.â $ Serreze claimed
on an alarmist blog that his actual claims â $ œquickly grew out of all reasonable proportion, â $ admitting that a summer loss of ice at the North Pole â $ œsummer would be purely symbolic, but symbolism can be pretty darned powerfulâ $ (prompting an alarmist, taxpayer - servant to call on his team to invoke such stunts more often).
This is especially useful for commenting
on alarmist news stories or blog articles.
Oops, i must have seen
that on an Alarmist Blog.
None of them are
on the Alarmist band wagon.
And finally, why do you discuss only the scientists
on the alarmist side and + none of the crazy advocacy people, but on the skeptic side you discuss none of the scientists and only the crazy advocacy guys.
Of course, some lukewarmers will then begin to argue that the effects of a 2C increase have been wrongly forecast
on the alarmist side, or that the precautionary principle can be set aside.
The idea that everything
on the Alarmist side is always right and everything on the Sceptic is always wrong is obviously a stupid and mundane assumption, yet all you do is apply your «brilliance» to one side.
Any climate realist posting
on an alarmist chicken - little site gets banned for even asking simple questions (which invariably go unanswered or the question gets «re-worded»)
Not all scientists are immune from the temptations of money and status — and it appears that
those on the alarmist side are more susceptible to temptation than most.
The top French weatherman who was sacked from his state broadcaster for speaking inconvenient truths about the non-existence of «man - made - global - warming» has taken exquisite revenge
on the alarmist establishment: now he's got a new job broadcasting from the Kremlin's propaganda arm, pouring
Are climate scientists not funded to the tune of $ 2 billion / year while complaining that Exxon threw $ 2 million / year to various groups, including Stanford, as though this proved a major conspiracy to suppress climate change, while ignoring their own funding — which exceeds that of physics and chemistry and depends
on the alarmist implications of climate change?
Just because Judith's many criticisms over the years of the IPCC, the AGU, and others
on the alarmist side of the fence have not echoed and / or matched word - for - word your own strident (and counter-productive, IMHO) Johnny - one - note clamouring does not make them any less valid.
Overconfidence is the trap that the tweedledees and tweedledumers
on your alarmist team falls into.
Here's an example of the persecution complex now being encouraged by
some on the alarmist end of the AGW side.
If the academic were not
on the alarmist's side, no grants, no funding, no job, no money, no food.
Seriously, is there anything out there worth reading
on the alarmist side that anyone can recommend?
It is long past time to replace it with objective, evidence - based hypotheses rather than manipulated computer models based
on alarmist - favored hypotheses not supported by the scientific method and objective analysis.
You might not believe this but from our point of view the cherry - picking is mostly
on the alarmist side.
I then started looking at the issue and I made the mistake of asking a question about error bars
on an alarmist blog and wow, I got immediately accused of all kinds of horrible things including being in the pay of big oil, a reaction that utterly shocked me.
None
on the alarmist side want to talk about the past 3 years other than shrugging it off as back - to - back La Nina's like they have some evidence that we can't two more of those in the next several years without any big El Nino's to counterbalance them.
One that I could think of is Freeman Dysom, but
some on the alarmist side would balk at choosing him.
Either the source was based
on another alarmist assumption, the source didn't support the claim, or it was just a propaganda piece.
Pat Michaels sums it up: Such results throw a bit of cold water
on alarmist ideas that rising temperatures will lead to ever - accelerating ice loss from Greenland and accelerating sea level rise.
Consensus Alarmist Climate Theory and Models based
on Alarmist Theory is the only thing that shows anything likely to go out of bounds.
RC has done a good job of debunking some of the more extreme comments
on the alarmist as well as septic side of the debate.
RE # 29
on alarmist warnings.
The burden of proof is
on the alarmists, and their proposed AGW hypothesis — not on the accepted paradigm that the climate is well within normal historical parameters.
Smokey: «The burden of proof is
on the alarmists, and their proposed AGW hypothesis — not on the accepted paradigm that the climate is well within normal historical parameters.»
The onus is clearly
on the alarmists, if they want to argue for high cost mitigation policies, to demonstrate what is the damage cost of warming.
A public attack
on the alarmists» «science» will not make any friends in the «environmental» community, of course, but it is doubtful that Trump would lose any votes in 2020 as a result if the Trump Administration can deliver its promised economic revival.
(Come
on alarmists, you can do better than that.)
The classic example of such behavior is commonly seen
on alarmists» websites.
So while I greatly appreciate your counter measure to push back
on the alarmists» non-science, I would prefer to be seen as an average Joe sharing his perspective and that you question every thing I say and scrutinize it thoroughly.
Not exact matches
In an interview
on the BBC (via ZeroHedge), IMF advisor Robert Shapiro said some incredibly
alarmist things.
«Pompeo has been more
alarmist and a bit more hawkish
on North Korea than Tillerson, so in regard to the path ahead, the Trump - Kim Jong - un summit and beyond, it may presage a more rocky road,» continued Manning.
Amid
alarmist media coverage
on the predicted numbers of jobs that will be lost to the combined effects of automation, artificial intelligence, machine learning and robotics, we like to take a regular look at some of the newer...
Two years ago, Asness and an AQR colleague raised hackles with a research paper that argued that the global temperature trends over the last 125 years do not,
on their own, support an
alarmist view of global warming.
If the choice between fanaticisms, whether secular or religious, is the only thing
on offer, the prospects for democracy are dim and talk about civil war may not be
alarmist.
Under pressure from a dissident group of Fellows, the Royal Society moved to meaningfully moderate its former radically
alarmist position
on global warming.
I would rather risk being called an
alarmist than deal with the consequences of being timid, just as I would rather alert my neighbors to the possibility of a fire based
on seeing smoke than remain silent until flames engulf their entire house.
Our 1996 symposium
on judicial usurpation and subsequent articles were criticized for being
alarmist; but the Florida Supreme Court changed many minds, and I now note that even worthies such as George Will are using the feared R - word, referring to the «regime» of lawless law - making by judges.
For the time being, I'll close with what I find most disturbing and unbecoming about Tooley's post: His
alarmist abuse of elitism or elite theory, which have recently become convenient, but unhelpful and terribly inconsistently applied, shorthand for all sorts of political fears from people
on the left and the right.
I respect Van Engen's conservative word of caution, not that of an
alarmist, but of an informed authentic mission practitioner, «In the twenty - first century Evangelical mission agencies are becoming increasingly committed and involved in humanitarian and compassion ministries, children - at - risk movements, and so
on.
Quran (25:52)-- «Therefore listen not to the Unbelievers, but strive against them with the utmost strenuousness...» Quran (33:60 - 62)-- «If the hypocrites, and those in whose hearts is a disease, and the
alarmists in the city do not cease, We verily shall urge thee
on against them, then they will be your neighbors in it but a little while.
When
alarmists charged that the polar bear was being hunted to extinction, the outcry sent scientists like Lee Miller and Jack Lentfer (below) off across the ice
on a rewarding research trail
Switched doctors, to one who is supportive of breastfeeding, uses the WHO charts for exclusively breastfed babies, and he agreed that the other doctor was being overly
alarmist in trying to push formula
on my baby.
Even by the
alarmist standards of many product warnings, the labels
on the backs of the football helmets are bracingly blunt: «No helmet system can protect you from serious brain and / or neck injuries including paralysis or death.
The FDA issued a ban
on the use of BPA in baby bottles in 2012, however,
alarmists are claiming that other chemicals in plastic are just as harmful as BPA, but there is no scientific evidence to back this up.
He noted that, in the previous weeks, he had dealt with a minor crisis over a US spy plane shot down by the Soviets, negotiations with the US about stationing Polaris submarines in the Clyde, fishery disputes with Iceland,
alarmist Treasury papers
on the economy, the reconstruction of the cabinet and a decision to build the new liner Queen Elizabeth II.
RE: Just a little piecprsteve
on the credibility of the authors of the study: Study co-author Dr. Roy Spencer, a principal research scientist at the University of Alabama in Huntsville and U.S. Science Team Leader for the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer flying
on NASA's Aqua satellite, reports that real - world data from NASA's Terra satellite contradict multiple assumptions fed into
alarmist computer models.