There are problems in some cities and states with some charter schools that need to be improved or closed, but calling for a national moratorium
on all charter school growth makes no sense at all.
Not exact matches
We find no basis for the allegations
made by the CRP authors, who argue that
charter -
school enrollment
growth, based
on the free choices of mostly minority families, represents a «civil rights failure.»
The central problem with
making growth the polestar of accountability systems, as Mike Petrilli and Aaron Churchill argue in «Stop Focusing
on Proficiency Rates When Evaluating
Schools,» is that it is only convincing if one is rating schools from the perspective of a charter authorizer or local superintendent who wants to know whether a given school is boosting the achievement of its pupils, worsening their achievement, or holding it in some kind of steady
Schools,» is that it is only convincing if one is rating
schools from the perspective of a charter authorizer or local superintendent who wants to know whether a given school is boosting the achievement of its pupils, worsening their achievement, or holding it in some kind of steady
schools from the perspective of a
charter authorizer or local superintendent who wants to know whether a given
school is boosting the achievement of its pupils, worsening their achievement, or holding it in some kind of steady state.
As per an article published last week in The Columbus Dispatch, the Ohio Department of Education (ODE) apparently rejected a proposal
made by the state's pro-
charter school Ohio Coalition for Quality Education and the state's largest online
charter school, all of whom wanted to add (or replace) this state's VAM with another, unnamed «Similar Students» measure (which could be the Student
Growth Percentiles model discussed prior
on this blog, for example, here, here, and here) used in California.
After all, Obama has until recently
made a compelling case thanks to efforts such as Race to the Top, which has managed to force states to lift or modify restrictions
on the expansion of
charter schools, and allow for the use of student test score
growth data in teacher evaluations.
EP Fellows in the New Orleans area work
on strategic projects that
make a difference, including:
growth plans for expanding
charter management organizations ARISE Schools and KIPP New Orleans, financial analysis of teacher retirement plans for Algiers Charter School Association, family engagement strategies for Bricolage Academy, and hands - on operations work for ReNEW Schools and Crescent City S
charter management organizations ARISE
Schools and KIPP New Orleans, financial analysis of teacher retirement plans for Algiers
Charter School Association, family engagement strategies for Bricolage Academy, and hands - on operations work for ReNEW Schools and Crescent City S
Charter School Association, family engagement strategies for Bricolage Academy, and hands -
on operations work for ReNEW
Schools and Crescent City
Schools.
The bill, which was signed into law by Gov. McCrory Wednesday, axes the State Board of Education's ability to shutter low - performing
charters if the
school has met student
growth goals or is
making progress
on a state - approved strategic improvement plan.