Sentences with phrase «on alleged harms»

Not exact matches

Christopher Dietz and his Washington, D.C. - based company, Dietz Development, filed suit in October against Jane Perez alleging that Perez made defamatory statements about Dietz on Yelp and Angie's List that harmed his reputation and business to the tune of $ 750,000.

Their first major campaign will be a series of ads aimed at parents and teenagers warning about the alleged psychological harm inflicted by spending too much time on social media.

Shortly thereafter, Daniels added a complaint in her lawsuit against Cohen, alleging defamation when on February 13 he stated in reference to claims of an affair that, «Just because something isn't true doesn't mean it can't cause you harm or damage,» implying that Daniels is lying about the affair.

On Monday, final arguments are scheduled in the family court case in Champaign County, which alleges emotional harm to the boy.

Silvers lawyers two weeks ago claimed that statements Bharara made about the charges — which allege Silver lined his pockets with nearly $ 4 million in bribes and kickbacks in a stunning abuse of power dating to at least 2000 — «caused irreparable harm by tainting» the grand jury that indicted him on Feb. 19.

The lawyers filed a motion to dismiss the charges — which allege Silver lined his pockets with nearly $ 4 million in bribes and kickbacks in a stunning abuse of power dating to at least 2000 — claiming public statements that Manhattan US Attorney Preet Bharara made about the case «caused irreparable harm by tainting» the grand jury that indicted him on Feb. 19.

A federal appeals court halted the release of a list of alleged co-conspirators in the 2013 George Washington Bridge lane closures after an anonymous person named on the list said its release would harm the person's reputation.

LAW360 - Feb 17 - A California judge tossed out a class action alleging the mobile dating app Tinder illegally discriminates based on gender by charging more for men and allowing women more matchups, saying the male plaintiff hadn't «connected the dots» to show how he'd been harmed.

If one or more of our members suffers or alleges to have suffered physical, financial, emotional or other harm following contact initiated on our platform or an online dating website of one of our competitors, any resulting negative publicity or legal action could harm our reputation and business and may have an adverse effect on us and the reputation of the online dating industry in general, potentially leading to, among other things, increased government scrutiny and regulation and an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.

This is especially true when such harms have an alleged disparate impact on a discrete class of society.

This question is designed to expose that those politicians who refuse to reduce their government's ghg on the basis that they are not scientists can not ethically justify non-action on climate change on this basis because once they are put on notice by respected scientific organizations that ghg from their government jurisdiction are harming others, they have a duty to prevent dangerous behavior or establish credible scientific evidence that the alleged dangerous behavior is safe.

This factor is not concerned with how intimate the plaintiff and defendant were or with their physical proximity, so much as with whether the actions of the alleged wrongdoer have a close or direct effect on the victim, such that the wrongdoer ought to have had the victim in mind as a person potentially harmed.

Plaintiffs began filing lawsuits across the country claiming the filters caused harm and death, alleging manufacturers» negligence, failure to warn, design defects, manufacturing defects, breach of implied warranty and negligent misrepresentation on the part the companies and their subsidiaries.

We've been working to raise awareness of emerging reports relating to alleged Taxotere hair loss and the harm this development inflicts on women.

It excludes minor or even moderate harm.19 Because there is no exact definition of what constitutes «great bodily harm»... it is actually determined on a case - by - case basis20... overzealous prosecutors have a tendency to allege it every chance they get.

Clifford alleges that the public statement Cohen issued on February 13, 2018, stating that «Just because something isn't true, doesn't mean that it can't cause you harm or damage,» was reasonably understood by those who read or heard it to concern Clifford and was «meant to convey that Clifford is a liar, someone who should not be trusted, and that her claims about her relationship with Mr. Trump» are not true.

A trademark owner must prove three things on a motion for an interlocutory injunction: (i) that its allegations raise a «serious issue» of infringement; (ii) that the harm caused by the infringement if it continues until trial would be «irreparable»; and (iii) that the balance of convenience favours granting an interlocutory injunction e.g. awarding an injunction would not cause any undue inconvenience to the alleged infringer.

From yammerings on about the alleged harms of «fatherless» households, to the demanding of a «shared parental responsibility» post-divorce that they never undertook during marriage when she begged them to do so, these men epitomize the reason that for eons, societies have ended up engaging in wars, and atrocities of justice have never been quelched, and the reason that irrational male - mob - mentality, however ostensibly sophisticated, and however ostensibly educated, continues to be the rule of the day.

The lawsuit did not allege that the Broker encountered a risk of harm while performing actions on behalf of the joint venture; instead, these allegations involved threats made by a disgruntled former partner.