Sentences with phrase «on answering the question why»

Reason is a beautiful evolution because it allows humans to survive and live through a deeper understanding of the universe focused on answering the question WHY?

Not exact matches

This is why, in a purely pragmatic sense, email is by far the best answer to this question to how to market on a budget.

But before we can delve into Riggle's advice on how to be more awesome, it's important to answer one glaring question: why does this academic talk like a teenage skater?

At at a press conference on Thursday, Chicago attorneys Thomas Demetrio and Stephen Golan, and Dr. Dao's daughter Crystal Dao Pepper, answer questions about Dao's «please kill me» comments, where the responsibility should lie and why they aren't suing immediately.

When promoting the company, focus on answering the question «why.»

There's bipartisan agreement, the email says, that Comey «needs to answer a simple question about his conversations with President Trump: If you were so concerned, why didn't you act on it or notify Congress?»

This trio of ideas is an expansion on a tried - and - true question that all copywriters strive to answer: «Why?»

For the rest of the morning, we focused on answering one simple question: «Why should my customers care?»

I am not sure I fully understand your questions, Lars, but to answer your first and third questions, the most appropriate definition of household income depends on why you are making the comparison.

Why does the public resist the wisdom of scientific consensus on «questions only they [scientists] are equipped to answer?»

During an interview on CNBC, he answered the question why his fund doesn't hold any shares of Facebook Inc (NASDAQ: FB)

During an interview on CNBC, he answered the question why his fund doesn't hold any shares of Facebook Inc (NASDAQ: FB) «I've often said that I don't want to be seen as begging against Mark Zuckerberg,...

Work with Investors and Raise Capital They are also able to always clearly answer the key questions: ▪ How much capital the need to raise ▪ What does success look like in 12 months ▪ Who is on the team and why ▪ Use of funds ▪ Who is in charge ▪ The go - to - market strategy ▪ How to recruit talent So for those who still feel compelled to build startups, a good starting point is to understand what it takes, and what the expectations are.

This response does not answer the question of why the entire economy would be affected by a single suit, an idea bordering on the preposterous.

There are myriad questions that have yet to be answered, which is why it is hardly surprising that so few Bitcoin and cryptocurrency investors have paid taxes on their holdings.

You have cowardly avoided answering the question on why you can influence other peoples children but only want your fellow fundies to influence yours.

Why does the same science that rejects or supposedly debunks religion because of the preposterous idea of an almighty, all - knowing, always present creator, yet licks their lips at the thought of an ultra intelligent extra terrestrial with the capability to answer question break the laws of nature, have mind reading capabilities, so on and so forth?

Topher C'm on coward answer the question, why can you interfere with other peoples children but you only want your fellow fundies to influence yours?

That two of the most prominent Catholic institutions would lay prostrate before the nation's most powerful supporter of abortion and infanticide indicates just how far the Roman Catholic Church has declined, and answers the question why so many have left the church and moved on to the Orthodox, Fundamentalists, and related denominations.

You intiial question of why does this occur, seems trivial and stupid both on its face and more in depth because you seem to imply that this question a) should be asked and b) the only possible answer is god and specifically the god of the bible is sitting there making sure every nanosecond, of every day, of every year, of every millenium, ect....

And as for the question of why are their bad things going on in the world and why god does not fix them or help, the answer I would give would be too ask god and the way to do that is too pray (don't worry praying is like Facebook, you post on gods wall and wait for a reply)

I answer questions on topic, what I ignore are personal attacks dressed up as questions, such as «why do you act superior» or «why do you say you get a warm feeling because you feel smarter than others.»

Vic You skipped answering my question on why you think life preservation is by design and that it is a given, how so?

Trust me, it's far more work trying to justify a delusion and rationalizing why what you believe isn't consistent with what you see in the real world than having one answer for all the questions you people flail about trying to answer and be able to rely on simple logic and facts to conclude there is no god.

I didn't say people's faith should be based on this, but since you brought it up, if a religion teaches it's followers God answers prayer and someone never has a prayer answered any rational person would question why his religion is teaching him something that doesn't seem to be true.

An advert on TV recently answered this question not by focusing on what the product is (Shredded Wheat is mentioned only once), but on why you need it.

Why do you «reply» to me without answering my questions or touching on my arguments but off in some new irrelevant direction?

It seems probable that failure on the part of many ministers to find adequate answers to this question is one important reason why organized religion has not made a larger contribution to the solution of the problem.

This is why, at one point in the book, I grant the Gnostics of old the validity of their questions, though I go on to revile the answers at which they arrived.

We have not provided satisfactory answers to question such as: 1) What caused tons of steel used in WTC buildings to literary turn into dust 2) Why WTC 7, after all it was not hit by any planes 3) what did hit pentagon 4) Why Cheney was commanding NORAD on 911 5) What did hit pentagon 6) Why did cheney ordered complete stand by as the object was approaching pentagon....

In his comments on Professor Jon D. Levenson's article «How Not to Conduct Jewish - Christian Dialogue,» Prof. David Novak remarks that «Why Prof. Levenson teaches mostly Christian students in a Christian divinity school is a question he needs to answer, even if only to his Christian students and colleagues at Harvard.»

They see it as a slap in the face for some reason (I'm not against them, though, just the idea that somehow a 2000 - year old Middle Eastern carpenter «died for me» (they never have a good answer as to what that really means)-RRB- and question why they spent so much money on my Catholic education.

In other words, the question I am trying to answer in this post is this: «Why would Jesus die for His enemies on the cross, but God drowns the enemies of Israel in the Red Sea?»

I'll tell you why because we don't speak the truth we do not give answers to questions and treat people like we grow Mushrooms Keep them in the dark and occasionally throw a load of crap on them.

Jeremy I believe you answered the question in another discussion why God seemed evil by punishing other nations i prefer the word you used which is judgement.God weighs up the hearts and then judges fairly thats not evil in fact he weighs up all the factors before he makes his decision and his decisions are perfect and wise.When he commanded Israel to wipe out other nations it was Gods judgement on these nations because of the evil they had committed in alot of ways its exaggerated because they did nt have Christ to shield them like we have if anything it shows how merciful God is towards us today.In those days gods judgement was quick and immediate.What happened to Israel when they broke the laws God gave them they immediately fell into judgement often resulting in many deaths to there own people until the sins of the people were dwelt with.So even for Gods people it was a conditional on there attitude and actions towards God.Again we see God is merciful to these previous nations that were destroyed as Christ after his crucifiction went and preached to them giving them the opportunity to repent so again we see God is still merciful.His word is true The Lord is not slow in keeping his promise, as some understand slowness.

Phrygian to me i sense that you are struggling with issues in your mind that you cant reconcile and these issues are affecting what you believe in your heart and therefore your faith in God.I had something similar happen to me recently regarding the story of the demon possessed man at one point the demons begged Jesus to cast them into the pigs does that mean that Jesus was implicated with the work of satan.It cast my mind into doubt and then i began to question who God is.I prayed and sort the holy spirit for an answer the answer i got was that Gods character never changes he is always holy righteous and sovereign why else would satan ask for his permission.So the answer was that he allowed satans purpose to prevail so that we can see that satans intention is always to destroy it may well have been that the pigs were his anyway.As they were for the gentile nations who offered the pigs to their demon Gods.Just as satan can not change who he is the destroyer the thief the liar God can not change who he is when we realise that despite what we see going on in the world God is still the same yesterday today and forever.The time is coming when those that have hurt others will be judged for there wickedness as we serve a holy and just God.Just as it was in the times of Noah so it is with this this generation that as the wickedness reachs its zenith then the Lord will return to judge the nations.He is coming again and we need to be ready it is not a time to be caught sleeping.brentnz

If you believe that you can ask God something, and get an answer, why waste questions on things like this?

I believe God is also asking us the why question (in His case He knows the answer) He continues to seek, search out the lost and continues to knock on our hearts door.

This series will partially answer these questions: Why are they on the street?

Even though there has been surrender on all secular problems, there still remain the so - called ultimate questions — death, guilt — on which only «God» can furnish an answer, and which are the reason why God and the Church and the pastor are needed.

Check out this video made by McDonalds to answer a customer's question: «Why does your food look different to the food on the ads?»

But I've been getting more and more questions from friends and readers why I don't have any Filipino recipes on my blog (short answer: the Filipino dishes I like are labor intensive and I'm too lazy) and lately, I've been craving adobo like no other.

let's face it, everyone and his brother has known what our deficiencies have been for several years, so why can't our management team seem to identify our weaknesses and aggressively target the necessary additions... the only plausible answer is we aren't willing to pay even close to market value for the players we clearly need and if we do actually get to the table we seem to make insulting bids that simple infuriate the team in question... for years Wenger has said he couldn't find any world class players to fill our voids, which seems to suggest that he thinks we currently have upwards of 40 world class players on our existing roster... if that is the case he should never be in charge of making personnel decisions... buying late in the window is so problematic, for obvious reasons, and especially since this year was supposed to be different (sarcasm)

Some are saying why not Ozil, well if these are the same people who are giving out about players out of position (cm's on wing) well then yous already know the answer to your own question.

What we want on the bench is a valid question and ignorance can be the only answer to why people thumbed you down

Anyone seeking an explanation as to why this happens at the Arsenal needs to address this question and find the answer before rushing off on a witch hunt to castigate Arsene Wenger — unless of course he is to blame for this state of financial incompetence.

I respect freedom of speech, but a very simple question needs to be answered by pro Wenger supporters: Every football manager in the world is judged on results, why does this rule not apply to Wenger?

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

I'd like any doubters on these pages to answer one question, WHY IS THERE NOT ONE REFEREE ON THE PREMIER LEAGUE LIST OF FROM SOUTHERN ENGLANon these pages to answer one question, WHY IS THERE NOT ONE REFEREE ON THE PREMIER LEAGUE LIST OF FROM SOUTHERN ENGLANON THE PREMIER LEAGUE LIST OF FROM SOUTHERN ENGLAND?

The more obvious question to ask and for me the most important question Arsene has to answer is why our best players are on the fence about committing their future to Arsenal?