Sentences with phrase «on answers to simple questions»

We will choose the correct number of exemptions for you based on your answers to some simple questions.

TurboTax will figure it out for you based on your answers to simple questions about your deductible expenses.

Based on their answers to simple questions, they can connect with a counselor right there on the screen.

As the role of algorithms grow, it is incumbent on attorneys to echo Warren's words, insisting on an answer to a simple question, «Is it fair?»

Not exact matches

Term Sheet reported yesterday on the wild goose chase to answer the simple question: How much money did unicorn Rubicon Global raise and at what valuation?

There's actually a pretty good answer to this question — one that's especially relevant for startups — and a pretty simple guideline that can help you determine exactly (a) when is the best time to start hiring some qualified sales managers and (b) whether the time is right for the CEO to take a step or two back from the front line, hand off the ball to the sales team, and focus on doing more valuable things for the business.

Some customer questions are pretty simple to answer, and many businesses strive to do so with FAQ documents on their websites.

There's bipartisan agreement, the email says, that Comey «needs to answer a simple question about his conversations with President Trump: If you were so concerned, why didn't you act on it or notify Congress?»

The news begged for a simple question to be answered: How could such an obscure concoction ever end up on the menu of an American casual dining chain?

In this blog post, I seek to answer that question by showing you a simple, yet quite reliable way to know when to step back on the gas pedal.

The question, even in its simplest form, is quite difficult to answer and the implications of that answer have huge impacts on your business.

I will no longer listen to them trying not to answer simple question, I will no longer believe their rhetoric, I will no longer pray for their salvation, they're on their own.

Trust me, it's far more work trying to justify a delusion and rationalizing why what you believe isn't consistent with what you see in the real world than having one answer for all the questions you people flail about trying to answer and be able to rely on simple logic and facts to conclude there is no god.

So JFA will not answer simple questions abou his cult's beliefs because I am not an American but he feels free to comment (in error) on Canada.

To answer your question... yes I am exploring the same issues by creating a very simple series of short vidoes placed on the web which exmaines a different path for the 21st century church to follow and what it could look like, Its not advertised but about 3500 viewings so faTo answer your question... yes I am exploring the same issues by creating a very simple series of short vidoes placed on the web which exmaines a different path for the 21st century church to follow and what it could look like, Its not advertised but about 3500 viewings so fato follow and what it could look like, Its not advertised but about 3500 viewings so far.

Just ask a simple question (its a question that everyone would agree on that the question is the exact one to ask to get the truth) and by the answer (yes or no) given by the most knowledgeable / high positioned persons of that religion, you will eliminate every religion except Christianity.

To Eric.G, to answer your question, It is my point of view that Jesus (PBUH) is the Son of God based on the simple statement that reads «god made man in his own image»To Eric.G, to answer your question, It is my point of view that Jesus (PBUH) is the Son of God based on the simple statement that reads «god made man in his own image»to answer your question, It is my point of view that Jesus (PBUH) is the Son of God based on the simple statement that reads «god made man in his own image».

The partisans on both sides, of course, have simple answers to these questions.

B) If you've ever watched even the most simple programs on cable TV regarding the Big Bang, the scientists are the first ones to admit that these are questions they can't answer... yet.

But if I am right and no one can answer how he came to be, or answer many other simple questions that are based on the assumption there is no God how does anyone here have the arrogance to think that they know more than me or anyone else.

The answer is simple: do the opposite of what catholics want because you can always expect to find them on the wrong side of any question regarding ethics and morals, especially if science is involved or it shows them to be evil.

No, the more basic reason for the challenge is that this very issue of theism or atheism is too complex to admit of the simple either / or kinds of answers apparently called for by the question emblazoned on the cover of Time for Easter 1966.

Maybe he's busy getting his beliefs strengthened as his local house of stupidity, errrr, worship... Maybe he's busy praying to his imaginary friend, asking it to stop those pesky atheists from asking simple questions he can't answer... Maybe he's huddling with the likes of Adelina, HeavenScent and the rest of that ilk on the ultimate proof of their god (s)... Maybe He's realized the only way not to look like an even bigger fool is to remain silent...

On the radio I use this simple rule to help me answer the majority of Bible questions I'm asked, even when I'm not familiar with the particular passage.

People have been asking that question for thousands of years and yet a simple «yes» doesn't really answer it, again, you can go on and keep on believing, I on the other hand have not found sufficient reason for me to believe in judaism.

On that cataclysmic issue, the bishops» pastoral letter on peace warns against giving «a simple answer to complex questions.&raquOn that cataclysmic issue, the bishops» pastoral letter on peace warns against giving «a simple answer to complex questions.&raquon peace warns against giving «a simple answer to complex questions.»

Moreover, Herr Odendahl wrote, this «romantic, poor Church» is growing «because the educational situation there is on average at a rather low level and the people accept simple answers to difficult questions.»

let's face it, everyone and his brother has known what our deficiencies have been for several years, so why can't our management team seem to identify our weaknesses and aggressively target the necessary additions... the only plausible answer is we aren't willing to pay even close to market value for the players we clearly need and if we do actually get to the table we seem to make insulting bids that simple infuriate the team in question... for years Wenger has said he couldn't find any world class players to fill our voids, which seems to suggest that he thinks we currently have upwards of 40 world class players on our existing roster... if that is the case he should never be in charge of making personnel decisions... buying late in the window is so problematic, for obvious reasons, and especially since this year was supposed to be different (sarcasm)

I respect freedom of speech, but a very simple question needs to be answered by pro Wenger supporters: Every football manager in the world is judged on results, why does this rule not apply to Wenger?

Wenger is worse than Sam Allardyce, very poor manager we have at Arsenal, poor, poor, dirt poor, watch Mahrez join Chelsea, anyway, I said it once I'll say it again the answer to all our problomatic questions on this here fine site of ours is simple: Wenger is a very poor mananger, Tony Pulis is even better

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

It's great to see not just any F1 team, but a front - running team like Mercedes to put out a simple video answering fan questions on what happened, especially after something as apparently controversial as what happened in Melbourne.

Throughout the 2013 NCAA Tournament, the team at Sports Insights has kept a close eye on Nate Silver's round - by - round predictions in an attempt to answer one simple yet profound question: Does new - age data analysis have a place in the uniquely unpredictable world that is March Madness?

This is a question I get more often than any other about our industry and the simple answer is yes, books would love nothing more than to have unlimited volumes and simply collect the juice on a perfectly balanced book.

Simple Mom Blog, June 6, 2009 Cloth Diapering 101 A week of cloth diapering articles at the Simple Mom Blog: 7 Cloth Diapering Questions, Answered Mom - to - Mom; 3 Compelling Reasons to Try Cloth Diapers; Visual Demonstration: How to Put on a Cloth Diaper, and How to Get One Clean; The Simple Mom Cloth Diaper Review; Cloth Diapering: Your Most Common Questions, Answered»

Spangler, Amy BREASTFEEDING: Keep It Simple Amy's Baby, 2004 Using a question and answer format, this short book uses simple language to provide information on how to breastfeed aSimple Amy's Baby, 2004 Using a question and answer format, this short book uses simple language to provide information on how to breastfeed asimple language to provide information on how to breastfeed a baby.

The direct, concise answer to the OP question of «have Chairman Nunes or any other Republicans on the committee publicly...» is simple: No, (at least not at the time the question was asked)

@SamIam - That comment seems applicable to 50 + % questions on this site that can be answered with a simple Google query

Angela Rayner squirmed after failing to answer a simple question and got her figures wrong while being grilled on the same show her colleague came unstuck on.

For the near future, we don't see large computing power successfully responding to the simple questions facing modern societies with complex answers: For instance, how do you motivate Asian governments to take action on climate change?

A debate rages on whether President Reagan did or didn't have Alzheimer's disease during his time in office.With what we have learned in the last decade about the disease, the question is relatively meaningless, except perhaps to score political points.The simple answer: of course he did.The newest technology — consisting of imaging and spinal taps — shows that the disease process begins its relentless course as many as 15 years before a firm diagnosis.

Ever since Stanley Miller inaugurated the era of serious research in the origin of life, chemists have been at the forefront of answering the question at the crux of the matter: how did the simple, primordial molecules on an early Earth self - assemble to form self - replicating, robust chemical structures subject to Darwinian natural selection?

We conducted additional tests in one of the five patients with evidence of awareness on functional MRI, and we found that he had the ability to apply the imagery technique in order to answer simple yes - or - no questions accurately.

For example, I am patiently waiting for someone at the Guardian to address the serious misrepresentations of Oxburgh and Muir Russell made by Steve McIntyre at last week's panel discussions in the U.K. (Not to mention McIntyre's characterization of paleoclimatology as little more than «phrenology» or his inability to answer a simple question about attribution of current warming — and don't get me started on Fred Pearce).

You can find answers to your questions in my book «The Candida Diet Solution — Cure Candida in 4 Simple Steps» — you can find it on Amazon under my name «Sandra Boehner».

Create your own inspiring cooking philosophy for your Family Kitchen (All you have to do is answer a few simple questions and then press «go» on your computer screen.

Thich Nhat Hanh, in addition to his magnificent (and deceptively simple) teaching on mindful dishwashing, answered the question «And how does a practitioner remain established in the observation of the body in the body?»

The answers to these simple questions will enable you to hone in on the core items that form the base of most of your outfits.

our home is painted Candlelight a soft yellow in all of the public rooms and we are going to paint that color in the guest room also... so the simple answer to your question is YES we use blue but then I ramble on... lol have a awesome day... we are going to be enjoying a nice 97 degrees today down from 106 yesterday....

When was the last time you remember reading an answer to this simple question on a dating site, «How do you feel about... (read more)