But, unlike most mediators, the facilitator usually has a counseling background and helps families work through the emotional fallout of divorce, keeps the focus on the future rather than
on arguments of the past, ensures that the children's best interests are being addressed, and teaches the spouses (and their attorneys) to communicate respectively and productively.
To help expedite this process and guide discussions to be future - oriented rather than concentrating
on arguments of the past, a neutral Facilitator is retained.
But, unlike most mediators, the facilitator usually has a counseling background and helps families work through the emotional fallout of divorce, keeps the focus on the future rather than
on arguments of the past, ensures that the children's best interests are being addressed, and teaches the spouses (and their attorneys) to communicate respectively and productively.
Rather than focus
on the arguments of the past, collaborative attorneys coach their clients to focus on the future and on what is most important to them, such as the health and well - being of their children.
Not exact matches
The Dragons» Den
argument speaks to something
of a mission Kopke has embarked
on in the
past few years to affect change in Canada's business culture.
Fischer, who has argued in the
past that the Fed needed to be wary
of being too slow in raising interest rates, made no such
argument on Sunday.
On the lighter side, we attempt to answer one endless fan
argument: How would the stars
of the
past fare in the NHL
of today?
The thrust
of his
argument is that interest rates need to go up as the Fed's been «adding enormous policy accommodation over the
past several years» and, even while they've long been missing their inflation target
on the downside, there's a risk
of getting «significantly behind the curve.»
The central chapter
on the Second Premise (K 65 - 140) contains: (i) a refutation
of the attempted application
of Cantor's transfinite mathematics to the domain
of extramental reality, (ii) two philosophical
arguments which attempt to show the conceptual absurdity
of the notion
of an infinite
past of finite actualities, and (iii) two
arguments from physics (concerning Big Bang and Thermodynamic theory, respectively) which attempt to show that probably the natural universe had an absolute beginning a finite time ago.
that is, «The world is thus [italics mine] faced by the paradox that, at least in its highest actualities, it craves for novelty and yet is haunted by terror at the loss
of the
past, with its familiarities and its loved ones,» refers, because
of the use
of the word thus, to a previous
argument that provides the grounds
on which Whitehead bases his assertion that the world requires both novelty and order.
Sherburne's
argument against me is based
on using the term «extensive continuum» to refer to the nexus
of occasions that constitutes the
past.
By resting much
of his case
on the unproven assumption that schools in the
past played the role he wishes they would play today, Hirsch detracts from his generally plausible
argument that more could be done today to help children know and understand their culture.
I know that we've discussed this issue at length in the
past, so if you've commented
on the topic before, consider presenting what you think to be both the strongest AND THE WEAKEST elements
of your own
argument... in the spirit
of the fast.
Madison's words were taken from a lengthy
argument against a specific bill in Virginia's legislature which would have levied a tax in order to financially support the teaching
of Christianity, and he argued against such a tax
on the grounds that
past legal support
of Christianity had led to its corruption.»
Suffice for now is to say this: it is my opinion that 1) Scripture is clear that God's wrath and holiness demanded a sin payment, 2) as I read your articles you seem to be trying to use every logical, illustrative, and theological trick to convince yourself it's not true, but it's like you're losing the
argument with yourself, 3) I really enjoyed that you broadened the truth
of salvation through Jesus
past justification (which many fundamentals focus
on) to include redemption, sanctification, covenant marriage, adoption, etc..
It is, in fact, a cornerstone
of an
argument pursued by our editor in chief for the
past three years, the war -
on - the - weak motif.
We can't forever live off our
past glories... we are already missing out
on players
of high value and we missed the UCL last year which really was one
of our main
arguments along with overpaying wages.
There is an
argument,
of course that # 75m
of that money has already been spent
on Virgil van Dijk — and while the timing
of both deals does hint at that, Liverpool have a net spend
of around # 30m over the
past two years not including the Coutinho and Van Dijk transfers.
Defense lawyers have sought to make the trial into a referendum for jurors
on Howe; his name came up hundreds
of times over the
past two days
of closing
arguments by lawyers from the four defense teams.
Over the
past week I've heard the following
arguments - they want to lift the poor out
of tax, actually the main beneficiaries
of this policy won't be the poor because they don't pay tax, but will instead be the middle class, anyway,
on a point
of principle we need to simplify the tax system, and we need to cut public services by # 80 billion per year, or maybe we don't.
Surely there can be no
argument for thinking our first
past the post system is actually democratic, where one party runs the country
on a minority
of our votes.
We are focused
on using the powers
of our Scottish Parliament to invest in the future, rather than re-running the old
arguments of the
past.
The issues at the several days
of hearings that began
on Monday may be more technical than in the
past, but the
arguments being bantered about are nothing new.
«There is a strong
argument that the enforcement role
of Local Authorities has been neglected in the
past and should take much greater prominence from now
on.
Tete Yartey also comes with the
argument that Africa has been raped and we need to be reminded
of things that went
on in the
past to learn from it.
This article is especially relevant today not only because it is a critical review
of past research
on moral education viewed through the lens and the work
of the authors, but because it is also a critique
of the current status
of higher education and an
argument for the need to focus more intentionally
on equity and fairness.
Desplechin's new film is the prequel to his masterful 1996 movie My Sex Life... or How I Got Into an
Argument — and as such, it invites viewers to reflect
on the
past two decades
of his career, during which he has brought to life a set
of richly intricate and emotionally potent tales that evoke the singular pleasure
of cinema, from My Sex Life and Kings & Queen to A Christmas Tale and now My Golden Days.
The Russo brothers understand how important the family dynamic is to this storyline, and they not only manage to portray that in this film, but use just enough personal banter
on top
of the intense drama to remind us that regardless
of past arguments they've always been a strong unit.
Similarly, the National Academy
of Advanced Teacher Education, or NAATE, which provides specialized professional growth opportunities for educators, works to retain teachers and school leaders through opportunities to grow in data - driven instruction techniques, peer leadership, and communication and feedback.32 Building
on past professional learning successes via its network
of teacher leaders in 185 sites, the National Writing Project's, or NWP's, College Ready Writers Program demonstrated that teachers will commit to and participate in high quality professional development that helps them strategize approaches to teach
argument writing using nonfiction texts and provided adaptable classroom materials.
It seems to me that in decades
past, an author interview almost always included some story
of the writer's closeness to either an editor, an agent, or both — patience worn thin,
arguments that broke through to epiphanies, real influence
on the work by these representatives, whose business, then, lay so much closer to the writing, itself.
... In learning philosophy you have to learn to argue for or against philosophical opinions and to understand and assess philosophical visions and you have to become familiar with some
of the
arguments and outlooks that have been advanced
on certain topics in the
past.
In history,
on the other hand, students are frequently expected to evaluate the plausibility
of an interpretation
of past events and to refer to documentary sources as evidence for their
argument.
When one is absorbed in the actual process
of analytical writing such typos can easily slip
past our attention since one is focusing
on getting the content and
arguments right.
In the
past discussion
of certain religions
on non-priority boards has caused so much
argument, taking time and resources away from MoneySaving work, that we've had to put a stop to it.
(And FYI: I replied out
of courtesy, but will ignore your replies from now
on, because I truly do not care for your opinion since in the
past I have read too many
of your posts to realize that any «
argument» you offer is truly worthwhile.
I revert back to my earlier
argument that Thieves in Time is a throwback to a bygone era, unfortunately the game has some
of its principles firmly set
on sticking to the
past.
but in an american audience, you can't get
past the titillation and gender / feminist oppression because the
argument is invalid without sex coming into a discussion and becoming filtered
on one side
of a long standing
argument that has nothing to do with the topic at hand.
A good example
of the modulated artist is McIntosh, whose abstract paintings over the
past decade are less monuments to completion than documentation
of the
arguments, altercations and injuries she has experienced while at work
on her canvases.
I understand the
argument that
past projections are based
on estimated future forcings which can change, but this amounts to the same things as tuning hindcasts and declaring matching a hindcast to observations as a validation
of your model.
As noted by Jones and Mann (2004)[Jones, P.D., Mann, M.E., Climate Over
Past Millennia, Reviews
of Geophysics, 42, RG2002, doi: 10.1029 / 2003RG000143, 2004],
arguments that such evidence supports anomalous global warmth during this time period is based
on faulty logic and / or misinterpretations
of the available evidence.
As I've written in the
past, there are clear economic
arguments for government funded, private sector executed basic R&D
on various climate - friendly technologies (I'm talking about invention and innovation, not diffusion), namely the public - good nature
of the product
of R&D (information), which leads to under - investment, given price signals.
It's been remarkable to see the lengthening line
of Republican politicians, particularly presidential hopefuls, chiding Pope Francis for pressing the case for action to stem global warming given how much conservatives have stressed values - based
arguments on important issues in the
past.
Also, being
on the Sierra Club web site does not discredit my
arguments, which have been made by several highly - touted climatologists in the
past (some
of whom post
on this site from time to time).
If policy
on climate change waits until things are certain, it will be far too late (after all, there are still lots
of arguments about what has happened in the
past 100, 1000 or more years — certainty is generally an illusive, unattainable goal
on the really interesting problems and questions).
Here, «it was very well known» and «proved by countless experiments» and the general «handwave to the
past authority
of Arrhenius / Tyndall / Fourier», enough to «prove they were right», while refusing to fetch any
of these claimed empirical studies — those denying the Dogma were being successfully marginalised further by this wave
of supercilious blocking
of arguments from AGWs all the while they were hypocrically proclaiming their repulsion to the blocking
of discussion
on the science and objecting to the malpractices such as hiding open access
of data.
The scientists also put paid to claims that global warming has «stopped» because global temperatures in the
past 15 years have not continued the strong upward march
of the preceding years, which is a key
argument put forward by sceptics to cast doubt
on climate science.
Perhaps the simplest
argument that shows that Powell is wrong is that surveys conducted in the
past ten years consistently show a stubborn, small minority
of scientists who dismiss the mainstream expert view
on AGW.
What does happen, has happened, in the
past with articles like the one Science published is not so very different in a number
of ways from what Rud Istvan, Steve McIntyre and others have done in blogs — bluntly point out deficits, tactlessly remark
on flaws and fault, explore unreservedly whether any facet associated with an article or paper weakens its
arguments.
Drawing
on case studies
of past environmental debates such as those over acid rain and ozone depletion, science policy experts Roger Pielke Jr. and Daniel Sarewitz argue that once next generation technologies are available that make meaningful action
on climate change lower - cost, then much
of the
argument politically over scientific uncertainty is likely to diminish.26 Similarly, research by Yale University's Dan Kahan and colleagues suggest that building political consensus
on climate change will depend heavily
on advocates for action calling attention to a diverse mix
of options, with some actions such as tax incentives for nuclear energy, government support for clean energy research, or actions to protect cities and communities against climate risks, more likely to gain support from both Democrats and Republicans.
Nisbet: In conducting any media analysis, as a researcher you have to make choices about which areas
of the news media to focus
on, basing these choices
on past research, theoretical assumptions, and the types
of popular
arguments voiced about the media.