In addition, it is suggested that pins and staples are not used
on asbestos because it can result in the «release of dangerous fibres that cause mesothelioma many years after exposure».
And most of the early sampling was focused
on asbestos because people got it fixed in their minds that asbestos was the big hazard.
Not exact matches
The partially demolished Eastwood Sports Center
on James Street in Syracuse is seen in December 199 after demolition was halted
because of
asbestos.
John — A friendly word of advice — I hope you're wearing your
asbestos undies
because this subject has brought out the cognitive dissonance
on the warmist side of the dance floor.
Because of better regulations
on the books since the 1970s and 1980s, most people aren't experiencing the kind of chronic
asbestos exposure that millions of workers were in earlier decades, but there are still everyday sources where contamination can occur.
El Dorado County in Northern California is another site of concern,
because it was built
on top of a very large deposit of
asbestos.
Though the public policy behind statutes of repose is based
on the policy judgment that a potential defendant should have no reasonable expectation of responsibility for injuries that occur after the passage of a number of years, the Court held that such a policy rationale does not apply to
asbestos cases
because: (1) the potential dangers associated with
asbestos exposure were well known by 1971; and (2) the typical latency period from
asbestos exposure to disease is much longer than the six - year window for filing personal injury claims under the statute of repose.
Many of us just accept a faulty medical device, a seemingly random accident at work or persistent coughing
because of
asbestos on the factory floor.
The Court held that it need not find a «special relationship» between Crane Co. and Ms. Jones to impose a duty
because the plaintiffs allegations were based upon Crane Co.'s own alleged misfeasance in utilizing
asbestos - containing products and not
on an alleged failure of Crane Co. to protect against the actions of a third - party tortfeasor.
Because mesothelioma is caused by
asbestos exposure, our law firm has filed many lawsuits
on behalf of these victims.
The House of Lords has unanimously upheld the Court of Appeal ruling that pleural plaques are not compensable
because they have no effect
on health or ability to work, produce no symptoms and do not cause other
asbestos - related diseases,» he says.