A search for atheist dating will bring up a lot of sites that focus
on atheism as the be all and end all.
Regardless, my initial sentence is about the discussion on morality, where you started again from scratch with
on atheism as if we hadn't been discussing anything for the past hour or so.
Not exact matches
Can't be too intelligent,
as you seem to misunderstand that
atheism, like any form of theism, is strictly a belief, and what a person believes has ZERO BEARING
on how intelligent they can BECOME.
Admittedly this particular thread is relatively tame compared to some I've seen, but I'm always amazed at the degree to which those who practice the religion known
as «
Atheism» feel a compulsion to foist their beliefs
on others.
There is much that could be said about this, but I will stick with one thing, based
on discussion at about the 2 minute mark: When atheists insist that
atheism does not drive behavior, and then then campaign
on behalf of
atheism, ridicule religion and religious believers in the name of
atheism, seek to change laws in favor of their atheistic positions, recommend the extermination of religion, and practice falsehoods like Dawkins's in support of
atheism, they prove that their
atheism drives their behavior and that their premise is false, disingenuous, and (
as far
as I can tell) useless for anything but giving
atheism rhetorical cover from being implicated in atheists» atrocities.
It is what has lead me to my veiw that
Atheism as a religion, the passion most Atheist have for their point of view from the start you may not fall in this category but I'm sure you know someone that does.The same applies to Christians that freak out
on someone and start forcing their view
on others, I see that
as wrong also if someone asks or brings the debate to you then by all means debate but why be rude how does it help?
As the burden of proof is
on the claimant, then the natural state is
atheism.
Atheism can not stand
on its own
as a belief because it isn't one.
Instead of actually trying to justify your failed attempt at trying to label
Atheism as a religion it is better to ignore it and focus
on being a troll instead.
Michael «
As a gay man I appreciate there efforts and support, but I think putting up this sign isn't really the best way to get through to people, all it does is create more hate, intolerance, and separation, I am not a christian but I am very spiritual, and putting up this sign implies that all gay people are atheists which is the furthest thing from the truth, I have no problem with religion, I have a problem with those who use there religions to control and hate others, same applies with
atheism, if you don't want to believe in anything than fine, just don't push your non beliefs
on me.»
Justin,
as much
as this would be a completely black & white, rational decision for you
on the subject, the majority of humanity floats in a gray area
on this, drifting back and forth between
atheism and strong spiritual beliefs (usually rooted in the culture they were raised in).
As a gay man I appreciate there efforts and support, but I think putting up this sign isn't really the best way to get through to people, all it does is create more hate, intolerance, and separation, I am not a christian but I am very spiritual, and putting up this sign implies that all gay people are atheists which is the furthest thing from the truth, I have no problem with religion, I have a problem with those who use there religions to control and hate others, same applies with
atheism, if you don't want to believe in anything than fine, just don't push your non beliefs
on me.
But,
as you see, night after night, this disingenuous game is started: «
on atheism...» It's ridiculous.
It's no coincidence
atheism is
on the rise during what will probably be known
as the information age.
Since
atheism per se takes no stand
on the killing of innocent people, when an sociopathic atheist is responsible for the deaths of people, be it one person or a million, it does not represent any kind of inconsistency with his status
as an atheist.
To ask whether a Christian can «try
on»
atheism is rather like asking whether a married man can live
as a bachelor.
We don't say there are six types of Theists, we focus
on the Religions, and that is what is missing — a modern Religion / Belief system for Atheists —
as Atheism does not mean without rules, just about whether God exists or not.
I believe
as atheism is
on the rise and more people are more outspoken, some ridiculous clichés are getting exposed for what they are.
While I would hesitate to engage in a full - out debate of theism vs.
atheism on this forum for reasons that I have already stated, I would be interested in hearing your response to the traditional ontological and moral arguments in favor of the existence of God
as well
as the argument from contingency.
He could border
on Agnostic
Atheism as do I. Just because someone is an Atheist doesn't mean that they won't discuss, research «God» etc..
I don't like people pushing religion or
atheism on me
as «fact,» when they have no way to prove one or the other is or is not true.
When Jerry DeWitt converted to
Atheism and it was posted
as an article here
on the Belief Blog, the Faithful said the same thing you said in wondering who this guy was and why was it news worthy.
As I've stated before, I believe the ideology of progressivism / liberalism is based
on atheism.
There's a full -
on atheist in the film; her
atheism is treated
as a local secret, the kind of thing the adults know but children must be kept from hearing.
This is an aspect of the Church's teaching that has not yet been fully developed and needs to flourish in the 21st century
as we ponder the message of the great Council of the Church that was held in the 20th, following two ghastly world wars and the imposition of
atheism on vast tracts of the globe.
But,
on the other hand, it is quite unjustified for theists to hold that we must tolerate or swallow the paradoxes or explain them away (by feats of ingenuity so subtle, and verbal methods so remote from intuitive insight or definite logical structures, that only deity could know with any assurance what was taking place), giving
as justification the claim that the alternative position of
atheism is even more paradoxical (lacking, it may be urged, any principle of cosmic explanation at all).
It's ironic to me how people that don't believe in Christianity hate having the views of christianity pushed
on them, but are so quick to not only push
atheism on others, but also to make fun of people who do believe, and make fun of Christianity
as a whole.
Kant may say this but again,
on atheism, his opinion
on morality holds
as much weight
as Hitler's.
Plus, it can get people angry when to see words used incorrectly and falsely, which some people misinterpret
as being caused by ideological indoctrination
on the same scale
as a religion and assume that
atheism must therefore be a religion.
This is a poor ad - hominem argument,
as these people did not kill anyone based
on the idea of
atheism.
- Adolf Hitler, in a speech in Berlin
on 24 Oct. 1933 [This statement clearly refutes modern Christians who claim Hitler
as favoring
atheism.
Until christians get more educated
on atheism / agnosticm, they will continue to wrongly perceive us
as amoral and evil.
here, i'll remove the entire hiatus
on nihilism vs. naturalism
as forms of
atheism and give it to you
as succinctly
as I can...
anyway,
on to your mistakes —
atheism is the foundation of Marxist - Lenninist communism, it wasnt an excuse... communists countries do nt suppress religious institutions because they foster rebellion, rather
as Lennin put it: Religion is one of the forms of spiritual oppression which everywhere weighs down heavily upon the masses of the people, over burdened by their perpetual work for others, by want and isolation.
And
as I read through the many posts
on this board many messages are made clear but none such
as transparent
as this one; the belief that
atheism is the way of superior and thinking humans and only the moronic or evil self - serving amongst the human race believe in the existence of a deity.
George Bernard Shaw Peter L. Berger, the most eminent sociologist of religion in the world today, many of whose sociological works
as Berger says «read like a treatise
on atheism,» has written a mature and skeptical affirmation of Christianity in his new book Questions of Faith: A...
As one writer put it, «Leaders such as Stalin and Mao persecuted religious groups, not in a bid to expand atheism, but as a way of focusing people's hatred on those groups to consolidate their own power.&raqu
As one writer put it, «Leaders such
as Stalin and Mao persecuted religious groups, not in a bid to expand atheism, but as a way of focusing people's hatred on those groups to consolidate their own power.&raqu
as Stalin and Mao persecuted religious groups, not in a bid to expand
atheism, but
as a way of focusing people's hatred on those groups to consolidate their own power.&raqu
as a way of focusing people's hatred
on those groups to consolidate their own power.»
Both sign of hinduism, racism Swastika nad Cross belong to hindu's Atheists, self centered and adopted by off shoot of hinduism,
Atheism, self center ism
as their sign, please visit limitisthetruth.com/blog.html and click
on word Choice to open file.
The regime treated
atheism as a state religion to be forced
on its citizens, and the abuses that resulted are more a reflection
on the wisdom of the Second Amendment than the merits of
atheism itself.
You have tried to twist it to make communism and
atheism mutually exclusive, but they are not,
as you have clearly met me and many others
on this blog and in real life who are atheist and not communist.
The few references to religion made by Marx in his later years indicate that, in spite of his lack of interest in this kind of problem, his view
on religion and
atheism did not change
as the years passed.
On your blog here you have described many in TLS
as atheist or «struggling» with
atheism to which you have described yourself
as «part proud atheist».
The few references to religion that Marx made in his later years indicate that in spite of his lack of interest in this kind of problem, his view
on religion and
atheism did not change
as the years passed.
There is no «
on atheism»,
as if there was some sort of doctrine that every atheist follows.
It is a crime to be borne
as a female by hinduism racism
as religion, based
on hindu
atheism, criminal self center ism, hindus, racist use women to extend their progeny, but they require female s parents to provide wealth
as dowry, to get rich.
Mod is an action by a person in an environment, depending
on legality or hinduism, illegality by hindu
atheism, criminal self center ism, it has nothing to do with environment at large,
as it is used today to define matters, because actions of a person are subject to scrutiny individually, not collectively, bases for call to treat individual acts
as individually not collectively.
There are also very fine critical essays
on great modern French authors,
as well
as acerbic pieces taking
on the puerile
atheism of folks like Christopher Hitchens.
The funny thing about organized
atheism is that it is structured
on the same foundations
as the mainstream religions.
I think most of the Americans are in lost...
as most of them do not know who their father is and it is very unfortunate... even if they know who their father is, the mom has children from diff men outside of marriage... and while a child is being raised, watching what his / her parents do to enjoy their life... so things become normal when they grow up... like if you go back early nineteen century, women were not allowed to go to beach without being covered... and now it totally opposite... if you do not have a boyfriend or girlfriend before 15, the parents worries that their teenage has some problem... and lot more can be listed... And then you go to Church, what our children learn from there... they see in front of the Church an old man's statue with long beard standing with extending of both hand... some of the status are blank, white, Spanish and so
on... so they are being taught God
as an old dude... then you learn from Catholic that you pray to Jesus, Mother Marry, Saints, Death spirit and all these... the poll shows a huge number of young American turns to
Atheism or believing there is no God and so
on... Its hard to assume where these nations are going with the name of modernization... nothing wrong having scientists discovered the cure of aids or the pics from mars but... we should all think and learn from our previous generations and correct ourselves... also ppl are becoming so much slave of material things...
Your point is exactly what Einstein would have said,
as a scientific question
atheism is an ignorant response based
on fear.