Sentences with phrase «on backing up their argument»

A lot of the books they disliked this year were thin on backing up their argument, and left a lot unexplained.

Not exact matches

However, one of the other signers of the declaration, Thomas McKean, denied the July 4th signing date and backed it up by illustrating a glaring flaw in Jefferson's, Adams», and Franklin's argument — namely, that most of the signers were not members of congress on July 4th and thus wouldn't have been there to sign it.

On the other hand, if your religion tells you things that can't be backed up with good secular arguments (like putting to death or shunning certain «undesirables») then those religious aspects should be kept out of the larger secular world.

I'm sorry but you're not making an argument to counter his, you have no references or citations to back up such a claim and so you revert to attacking this man by calling him gay??? really, you think your the world authority on the bible when then you start casting stones left and right and attacking your fellow man?

You called me out as being disingenuous when I said «that as time goes on however, I'm finding things that are helping to disprove things previously held as fact among Christians», so I have provided you an example that not only wasn't it a disingenuous statement, but that I've done my homework, on both sides of the argument, and came up with something that no one has been able to give me a response with even either the slightest chance of being possible, or falling back to the old status qua of «mysterious ways» and «having faith».

To many, it has seemed an unedifying sight that those who defend theism on cosmological grounds have time after time given up their arguments only to come back with new ones which in turn are later surrendered.

Jeremy i am surprised you never countered my argument Up till now the above view has been my understanding however things change when the holy spirit speaks.He amazes me because its always new never old and it reveals why we often misunderstand scripture in the case of the woman caught in adultery.We see how she was condemned to die and by the grace of God Jesus came to her rescue that seems familar to all of us then when they were alone he said to her Go and sin no more.This is the point we misunderstand prior to there meeting it was all about her death when she encountered Jesus something incredible happened he turned a death situation into life situation so from our background as sinners we still in our thinking and understanding dwell in the darkness our minds are closed to the truth.In effect what Jesus was saying to her and us is chose life and do nt look back that is what he meant and that is the walk we need to live for him.That to me was a revelation it was always there but hidden.Does it change that we need discipline in the church that we need rules and guidelines for our actions no we still need those things.But does it change how we view non believers and even ourselves definitely its not about sin but its all about choosing life and living.He also revealed some other interesting things on salvation so i might mention those on the once saved always saved discussion.Jeremy just want to say i really appreciate your website because i have not really discussed issues like this and it really is making me press in to the Lord for answers to some of those really difficult questions.regards brentnz

When adversaries stick it to you from outside the club, always trying to cause a stir within and among us and we have so called fans agreeing with these failed pundits who prolly do nt even have a voice in their own households, we like illegitimate children back up their unsincere arguments, hell Piers Morgan does it from a place of genuine concern, the AKBs and AOBs too, Fatboy gooner and NY gunner on here even and we are happy to have them but when we thoughtlessly indulge and endorse those who would rather see us fail by always coming up with.unsolicited advise especially without any reasonable bases, we are as much enemies of the club we claim to love, cutting of our nose to spite our face... shame again.

Unfortunately there are no stats to back up this argument but all one has to see is how comfortable this man is when he is on the ball; he's like Marvin Gaye — smooth.

The argument being, if he was any good he would have cost more and of course it also proves no one else is coming in because AW wouldn't spend that much on a back up.

She makes the common sense argument that failing to pay for more healthful meals up front will only result in higher health care costs on the back end, and she considers a variety of ways to pay for universal lunch, such as a tax on soda or soda advertising, an increase in the capital gains tax, or by reducing income guarantees and price supports to producers of corn and soy.

Check back on Monday, January 30th for Part Two of «A Wellness Wake - up Call,» for strategies and solutions to implementing new wellness policies, and to learn how the Wellness Impact Report can help you make data - driven arguments to win over reluctant stakeholders.

Cuomo traditionally had taken a laissez - faire posture toward the IDC, backing up its argument that it is a moderating force on the GOP Senate that has helped force votes on gun control and raising the age of criminal responsibility.

The woman said the argument on the audio recording in which she accuses McLaughlin of roughing her up took place later that day as she and the assemblyman drove back to his Troy office on Hoosick Street after lunch.

Redwood's argument is that the UK is bound into the EU's trade policy by its membership of the customs union and that the EU's trade policy is to have no agreements with other countries at all — thereby leaving both us and them on back - up WTO trade terms when it comes to the rest of the world.

The absence of the information about house movements on the back of the bedroom tax — called a «spare room subsidy» by the government — raises questions about arguments from ministers that the policy was designed to save money and free up existing stock to cut housing queues.

The press are picking up on this as an ttack on Ed, read Eoin Clarkes blog and he point's out it wasn't, Ed miliband had the energy to win, and unfrtunatley he's been disapointing, david miliband couldn't win the ARGUMENT to win and as such he had his chance and blew it, after the Leelction If another leader (Yvette) t akes over the next elader would be wise to invite david back, but he's not leadership amterial as by his fialed leadership campaign showed,

Well, I don't think we should start messing around fixing it in the sense of sending them miles up into the space; [in] fact I make some arguments why that's not going to happen, because we can't even agree on CO2 now, the world's nations are not going to agree upon how much to try to turn the thermostat back, particularly when the crops might be growing better with higher CO2, right now when the temperature effects haven't kicked in fully.

To back up the «relevance» argument, there has also been an abundance of literary adaptations and references on TV and the big screen that have struck a populist chord.

This module offers students and educators an opportunity to explore how to make an argument, back it up with facts, apply critical - thinking skills, and finally take a stand on these relevant topics:

This module offers students and educators an opportunity to explore how to make an argument, back it up with facts, apply critical - thinking skills, and finally take a stand on these relevant topics: Should There Be Animal Testing?

** Looking for more specific information (with references) to back up the arguments for keeping the cap on charters?

Rather than try to build this argument myself, I'll turn things over to Larry Swedroe, who has made it eloquently many times on his blog — backed up with empirical data, as always:

We know about an investing strategy that beats Buy - and - Hold in 102 out of 110 time - periods, an investing strategy that permits us to obtain far higher returns at dramatically less risk, an investing strategy that permits us all to retire years sooner and that would bring us out of this economic crisis if we could share it with millions of middle - class investors (if people could switch to an investment strategy that would put their retirement plans back on track, they would feel free to start spending again and businesses could start hiring again), and our first reaction is to come up with convoluted arguments as to why the best thing to do is to AVOID learning more about it and to AVOID getting the word out to the millions of middle - class people whose lives we have destroyed with our promotion of Buy - and - Hold.

- takes place at a prestigious academy located on an isolated island - protagonist is Tenma Wakakoma, who doesn't get along well with his Medabot partner - after a heated argument, he walks back home depressed and ends up meeting the Roborobo Team by accident - he decides to follow them and ends up in a fight involving the group and a mysterious Medabot - Tenma manages to fend off the evil group, but he doesn't know is that an old man witnessed the whole thing - several days later, he receives a mysterious letter that tells him he has been selected to enter the prestigious academy - he even received a scholarship for it - Tenma accepts and enrolls in the academy - the academy is a place where the richest and most influential Medabot battlers train - the academy is located on a large, exhausted Medalia mine - rumors say there's still a large, undiscovered Medalia vain underground - total of 290 Medabots - revamped battle system allowing for swapping of Medabots parts during battle

(I kinda wish I could go back in time to Y2K and let my younger self know that all those Link v. Cloud arguments on Gamefaqs are one day going to wind up going to some strange and fabulous places.)

I wasn't aggressive, I wasn't a fanboy, and I actually used factual arguments to back up my claims, so why the disagree, unfortunately, I may not answer, as I can only post once more after to this, but I will read it, so come on, tell me what you disagreed with in my post.

Even if you refuse to buy my arguments at least have the honesty to acknowledge that every claim I've ever made on this blog has been backed up by evidence.

I'm sorry to be such a party - pooper, but I have on my side of the argument about 10,000 years of so - called civilised human history to back me up.

Bobby, all of your arguments as based on the ASSUMPTION that there MAY be significant photonic bounceback, that said bounceback, if any, is significantly worse than the reflections off the sand the light would hit anyway, that any bounceback would propagate all the way back up out of the atmosphere, and that we need to cover «thousands» of square miles with solar cells.

Bertrand Russell, of Principia Mathematica fame, who was mentioned in the comments above, tells us: «I had gone out to buy a tin of tobacco; on my way back, I suddenly threw it up in the air, and exclaimed as I caught it: «Great Scott, the ontological argument is sound.»

Some arguments of the «well OK we might be wrong, but then something else would be too» (which is a pretty silly attitude... you ought to have ideas that you think are correct in your science papers, not blog debating points that you can't even back up on their own).

Now we know Russell was a whitewash and my that submission was hacked down to a quarter of its size and striped of most formatting and hard evidence before it was put to UEA, but even so all the AR4 and AR5 Lead Authors and Review Editors signed up to up a plausible argument that they did nothing wrong on the back - channel and the deadline issues.

I will therefore be back to take you up on your offer, though I fear you may not find my arguments very demanding!

Well, it looks like the press release was carefully worded, and referring back to Anthony Watts article on his blog which is criticized at the beginning of the RC article, i see no wrong claim there... Hiss main argument is written in bold: «The IPCC is under scrutiny for various data inaccuracies, including its claim — based on a flawed World Wildlife Fund study — that up to 40 % of the Amazonian forests could react drastically and be replaced by savannas from even a slight reduction in rainfall.»

It's the same argument I used for JD Supra on the web: don't just tell me you're an expert, back it up.

Their file may very well turn on supporting case law to back up their arguments, and yet, if a self - represented litigant lacks sufficient research skills, the effect is like going into battle with second - hand armour.

After all, if the law and the facts are firmly on your side, and you have the evidence and briefs of law and reasoned argument to back it up, then why would you have to resort to rudeness?

In this case, having a Phoenix construction accident attorney on your team is essential because they already know all the aspects of your case and make sure that their argument is backed up by the witnesses that were called in earlier proceedings.

For example in Ishaq v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 FC 156, (a case about whether a woman could wear her niqab during a citizenship ceremony), six public interest groups — including the Ontario Human Rights Commission, the Canadian Civil Liberties Association and the National Council of Canadian Muslims — were refused permission to intervene, as the court determined that they could not advance their proposed arguments without social science evidence to back them up; nor could the court take judicial notice (facts and materials are accepted on a common sense basis without being formally admitted in evidence) of any of the facts necessary to support the arguments.

Nothing up yet, but it might be worth checking back in the not too distant future to see if the audio of the oral argument pops up on Oyez.org.

On the basis of my previous arguments against the price rising, I believe the headwinds that were holding back bitcoin will take the price up to the $ 1,000 mark, this year.

we get into a lot of arguments and yes after the cheating incident i have asked for a divorce but i didn't mean it i was very upset we have gotten in multiple physical fights and we have made up from them but recently we have gotten in a really bad one to the point where my husband has told me that he no longer wants to be with me and wants to divorce me i need advice on what i should do like he still tells me he loves me and is nice and loving toward me every so often but then he goes back to the whole he doesn't want me and tells me not to touch him but then a few hours later or a day later he wants to be close again.