«Defendants are prohibited from soliciting, directly or indirectly, North Carolina residents for the purpose of offering debt settlement, debt negotiation, debt management, mortgage modification, foreclosure relief services, or any related debt adjusting services, and are likewise prohibited from such solicitation
on behalf of any third party offering these services.»
Not exact matches
Provide you with electronic newsletters, information, special
offers and promotional materials
on behalf of our Services, companies within our corporate family, and
third parties, in accordance with applicable law;
We may use
third party vendors to perform certain services
on behalf of us, such as hosting the site or application, fulfilling your orders
of products and / or services, designing and / or operating the Service's features, tracking the Service's activities and analytics, and enabling HBO to send you special
offers or performing other administrative services.
Securities are not are not federally - insured; are not obligations
of the credit union; are not guaranteed by the credit union; involve investment risk, the value
of the investment may fluctuate, the return
on the investment is not guaranteed and loss
of principal is possible; may be
offered by a dual employee who may accept deposits
on behalf of the credit union and may sell non-deposit investment products
on behalf of a
third -
party securities broker - dealer.
All Claims are brought by, or
on behalf of, former Iraqi employees
of the Defendants in Iraq, and all those contracted via
third parties to
offer services to the Defendants in Iraq between 2003 and 2009 and seek damages from one or more
of the Defendants alleged injuries and / or financial losses caused by the alleged failure
of one or more
of the Defendants to adequately protect them or their Deceased relatives from risk
of threats and / or injury from those opposed to the Defendants» presence in Iraq.
The insurance premium
offered by the bank might be higher in comparison to other standalone insurance providers, as insurance is a
third -
party product and banks would have to purchase them
on behalf of the policyholder.
We will share your personal information with
third parties, for any reason we choose, including without limitation for the following purposes: (1) to submit additional insurance
offers (including the transfer
of the information to advertisers or to
third parties who maintain
on our
behalf a list
of persons who have requested an insurance quote), (2) to permit advertisers or other
third parties to use your Information for any purpose such as contacting you by email, phone, SMS text message, U.S. mail or any other means
of communication for any purpose, (3) to confirm you have completed all
of the necessary steps to receive your insurance quote, and (4) as we are required to do by law.
Article 80 (2)
of the GDPR
offers EU member states an optional provision allowing for collective redress for consumers via
third parties, such as consumer privacy groups acting independently and lodging data protection complaints
on consumers»
behalf.
Amazon does
offer third -
party promotions (ads for companies or websites that are not under the Amazon umbrella) but they build and send these themselves
on behalf of the
third -
party and don't give another company your information.
Since the broker wasn't acting
on behalf of a
third party, the court ruled that he wasn't
offering brokerage services and therefore wasn't entitled to any compensation.
Joseph P. Day Realty Corp. v. Chera (308 A.D. 2d 148)- broker's complaint for commissions reinstated where questions
of fact exist as to whether broker was the procuring cause
of a commercial tenant and if there was an implied contract which arose from landlord's acceptance
of the benefits
of broker's services; broker must plead and prove a contract
of employment, express or implied, and in the absence
of an express contract, an implied contract may be established in some cases by the mere acceptance
of the labors
of the broker; broker failed to establish that it was a
third party beneficiary
of lease agreement between landlord and tenant where provisions in lease merely provided for indemnification between the
parties and did not expressly set forth that one
party would be obligated to pay the broker's commission; indemnification provisions in the lease agreement do provide evidence
of implied contract
of employment with landlord where landlord agreed to indemnify tenant against brokerage commission claims from all brokers including plaintiff and where, to the contrary, tenant's reciprocal indemnification excluded plaintiff; triable issues
of fact exist as to whether broker was the procuring cause where broker introduced the
parties, showed the space to tenant's representatives, was involved in weekly negotiations with the
parties over the lease terms, conveyed
offers on behalf of tenant to landlord and participated in the meeting with the landlord and tenant at which the lease terms were finalized