[21] In my view it is improper to categorize the non-treating doctor or any other third party consultant retained
on behalf of the plaintiff as a witness in which there is no property.
Not exact matches
Shareholder Litigation., C.A. No. 422598 - V (2018), the Maryland Circuit Court, Montgomery County, approved a $ 17.5 million settlement that
plaintiffs achieved
as additional consideration
on behalf of a class
of shareholders
of American Capital, Ltd..
The
plaintiffs who originally filed the lawsuit
on behalf of the class — Ingrid Avendano, Ana Medina and Roxana Del Toro Lopez — worked in the same engineering department
as Fowler.
Investor advocate, Mark Elliott — who recently won a class action
on behalf of investors in Downer EDI — lodged the claim
on behalf of investor John Webster, who will act
as «lead
plaintiff» in the case
on behalf of other investors who join the action.
The
plaintiff is seeking: A declaration that upon a true and proper interpretation
of the provisions
of the 1992 Constitution, particularly Articles 88 (5), 218 (a) and (e), 284 and 287 thereof, the 1st defendant can not act
as the legal representative for Honourable Kenneth Nana Yaw Ofori Atta, the Minister
of Finance
of the Republic
of Ghana, in a pending investigation bordering
on conflict
of interest and abuse
of office before the 2nd Defendant; A further declaration that the purported response filed by the 1st Defendant
on behalf of the said Honorable Kenneth Nana Yaw Ofori Atta in respect
of the petition concerning conflict
of interest and abuse
of office before the 2nd Defendant is unconstitutional, null and void and
of no effect whatsoever;
A copy
of the suit said: «This honourable court will be moved by Gary Nimako Marfo ESQ., counsel for and
on behalf of plaintiff / applicants herein praying for an order
of interlocutory injunction to restrain defendants / respondents, whether by themselves, agents, servants, workmen, hirelings, privies or any person claiming under or through them or howsoever described, from holding out the second defendant / respondent, [
as] the parliamentary candidate - elect for Klottey Korle constituency.»
A copy
of the suit, which is available to ClassFMonline.com said: «This honourable court will be moved by Gary Nimako Marfo ESQ., counsel for and
on behalf of plaintiff / applicants herein praying for an order
of interlocutory injunction to restrain defendants / respondents, whether by themselves, agents, servants, workmen, hirelings, privies or any person claiming under or through them or howsoever described, from holding out the second defendant / respondent, [
as] the parliamentary candidate - elect for Klottey Korle constituency.»
All
of us involved in the case — recall that Jesse Rothstein and I served
as the expert witnesses
on behalf of the
plaintiffs, and Thomas Kane
of the Measures
of Effective Teaching (MET) Project and John Friedman
of the infamous Chetty et al. studies (see here and here) served
as the expert witnesses
on behalf of the defendants — knew that all
of the
plaintiffs» claims would be tough to win given all
of the constitutional legal standards would be difficult for
plaintiffs to satisfy (e.g., that evaluating teachers using their value - added scores was not «unreasonable» was difficult to prove,
as it was in the Tennessee case we also fought and was then dismissed
on similar grounds (see here)-RRB-.
On behalf of the state's children, teachers, public schools and taxpayers, the
plaintiffs argued that Connecticut's school funding formula failed to ensure that every child had access to a quality and productive education,
as guaranteed by the state constitution.
Apple and five major publishing houses are being sued by a Seattle - based law firm, Hagens Berman,
on behalf of two
plaintiffs named in the suit and
on behalf of consumers
as a... [Read more...]
Apple and five major publishing houses are being sued by a Seattle - based law firm, Hagens Berman,
on behalf of two
plaintiffs named in the suit and
on behalf of consumers
as a whole.
Jerry Carroll announced
on behalf of the
plaintiffs that the founding track ownership group will not exercise remaining legal options in the case
of Kentucky Speedway, which largely cleared the way for SMI to move a Sprint Cup date to Kentucky Speedway
as early
as 2011.
Plaintiff Oceana, Inc. («Oceana»)
on behalf of its adversely affected members hereby challenges the unlawful decision
of the National Marine Fisheries Service («Fisheries Service» or «Defendants») to adopt and promulgate Amendment 5b to the Highly Migratory Species («HMS») Fishery Management Plan because it failed to establish measures necessary to end overfishing and rebuild the dusky shark population to a healthy level
as mandated by the Magnuson - Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act («Magnuson - Stevens Act»).
In one
of the original climate lawsuits, filed in 2008
on behalf of the Alaskan village
of Kivalina, the
plaintiffs made the same claims
as New York City, Oakland, and San Francisco — including the specific citation
of «potentially irreversible» impacts and a «significant loss
of life»
as a result
of climate change.
In 2008, Gordon Wallace retained McKercher LLP to represent him
as the leading
plaintiff in a class action lawsuit
on behalf of Prairie farmers against Canadian National Railway, Canadian Pacific Railway, and others for allegedly overcharging them for grain transportation over 25 years.
In a wrongful death case, the victim's family acts
as the
plaintiff on behalf of their loved one.
In my view, it was open to the jury to find the facts in this proceeding in such a way
as to entitle the jury to conclude that Google Inc was a publisher even before it had any notice from anybody acting
on behalf of the
plaintiff.
OUR Law Firm has experienced litigators, who appear for clients before all levels
of the Pakistani courts in order to fight
on behalf of them, for both the
plaintiff and the defendant, before all stages
of arbitration panels and the various forms
of the ADR
as well
as representing them in all attempts to attain an amicable settlement with their opponents.
Therefore, lawyers acting
on behalf of plaintiffs may also benefit if their clients purchase Trial Insurance,
as they stand to receive protection for disbursements incurred.
Recognizing Henry's long preeminence
as an advocate and litigator
on behalf of his clients, he has been acknowledged
as one
of the 500 Leading
Plaintiff's Lawyers in America by Law Dragon,
as one
of the Top 100 Trial Lawyers in America by the American Trial Lawyers Association, and is also included in Best Lawyers in America.
Having articled at the second largest Corporate Commercial, a.k.a. insurance defence firm, in Calgary, and then moved
on to practice
as plaintiff's counsel (counsel for injured people) at Calgary's top boutique litigation firm, I am an strong and committed advocate
on behalf of those injured
as a result
of the negligence
of others.
On behalf of both
plaintiffs and defendants, our IP litigators have handled numerous trials,
as well
as TRO and preliminary injunction proceedings, involving intellectual property.
ILS is a
plaintiff electronic discovery firm, although we also serve
as the objective case manager for the document production phase in multiparty litigation, acting
as an independent third party vendor and service provider
on behalf of counsel for both
plaintiffs and the defense.
TORONTO, Aug. 13 / CNW / — This is to announce that today the law firms
of Stevenson LLP and Bogoroch & Associates have been instructed to commence a class action
on behalf of the representative
plaintiffs, Giuseppina Santoro and Gianfrano (John) Santoro for damages sustained by the residents, homeowners and business persons
as a result
of the explosions which took place
on Sunday, August 10, 2008 at the premises
of Sunrise Propane Energy Group Inc..
On behalf of an Indian Tribe client, Mr. McConnell successfully moved for summary judgment
as a
plaintiff against a contractor who was improperly licensed for over $ 900,000 in one action, and over $ 2,000,000 in another.
Medical, accident reconstruction and other experts are often vigorously cross-examined regarding their fees, relationship with the attorney who is paying them or the percentage
of cases for whom they testify
as either
on the
plaintiffs» or the defendants»
behalf.
Negotiated a favorable resolution
on behalf of a developer
of a multi-million dollar mixed - use condominium, both
as the defendant against claims
of significant construction defects, and
as the
plaintiff in a third - party complaint asserting indemnification and contribution claims against subcontractor defendants.
Secured a summary judgment
on behalf of a restaurant in the Superior Court and
on appeal before the Massachusetts Appeals Court by proving that the restaurant would not infringe
on the
plaintiff's legal and private rights and that,
as a result, the
plaintiff had no standing to challenge the zoning relief afforded the restaurant
Plaintiffs may also attempt to bring suits against alleged wrongdoers, such
as corporate officers and directors, derivatively
on behalf of a company.
When a client is incapable
of instructing counsel ab initio or when the client is a minor, it is most often a family member who retains the lawyer
on behalf of the injured
plaintiff, and is later named in the action
as litigation guardian
on behalf of that
plaintiff.
The
Plaintiff advanced an ICBC claim, seeking damages for many types
of claims, including pain and suffering, future care, past and future loss
of housekeeping capacity,
as well an in - trust claim
on behalf of her son, who took over the role from his mother for caring for his father,
as well
as doing housekeeping chores that the
Plaintiff had performed before the accident.
[1] In the course
of this jury trial I ruled that Dr. Frank Lipson, who had conducted a defence medical
of the
plaintiff, not be permitted to testify
as an expert witness
on behalf of the defence.
Mr. Patterson has obtained numerous million dollar verdicts and settlements
on behalf of his clients, including working to obtain compensation
on behalf of the victims
of the Indiana State Fair Sugarland Stage Collapse, litigation in which he was selected to serve
as Plaintiff's liaison counsel.
For example,
as arguing counsel, Tom has prevailed
on behalf of bond purchasers, corporate civil defendants (three times), corporate civil
plaintiffs (three times), a debtor, employees (twice), a habeas petitioner (three times), an immigrant, investors, an individual civil defendant, an individual criminal defendant, a local government, persons with disabilities, and shareholders.
The Court's decision in California State Teachers» Retirement System v. Alvarez — a suit brought
on behalf of Wal - Mart Stores, Inc. — refused to adopt the Delaware Court
of Chancery's recommendation that,
as a matter
of federal due process, a judgment in one derivative action should not bind the corporation or its stockholders in another derivative action unless either (i) the first action has survived a motion to dismiss because a pre-suit demand
on the corporation's board
of directors would have been futile or (ii) the board has given the
plaintiff authority to proceed
on the corporation's
behalf by declining to oppose the derivative suit.
What the judge never referenced in her decision was actuarial evidence submitted
on behalf of the
plaintiff that foreign nationals who smoke or engage in risky behaviour, such
as fast driving, cost even more to our health and social service system, yet they are never labelled an excessive demand.
The
plaintiff's action is brought
on its own
behalf, and
on behalf of a Class defined
as all land surveyors (individuals, corporations or partnerships) in Ontario who,
on or before March 26, 2014, were the:
Excellent at taking depositions
as a
plaintiff's attorney and has a track record
of securing large settlements
on behalf of clients.
The three complaints brought
on behalf of individual
plaintiffs as well a class
of similarly situated individuals essentially allege the same type
of violation — that the employer failed to obtain a valid consent
on a standalone form that did not contain extraneous information.
If the
plaintiff can show that the playground was actually dangerous, then the parent may sue
on behalf of the child
as his or her legal guardian.
Joseph P. Day Realty Corp. v. Chera (308 A.D. 2d 148)- broker's complaint for commissions reinstated where questions
of fact exist
as to whether broker was the procuring cause
of a commercial tenant and if there was an implied contract which arose from landlord's acceptance
of the benefits
of broker's services; broker must plead and prove a contract
of employment, express or implied, and in the absence
of an express contract, an implied contract may be established in some cases by the mere acceptance
of the labors
of the broker; broker failed to establish that it was a third party beneficiary
of lease agreement between landlord and tenant where provisions in lease merely provided for indemnification between the parties and did not expressly set forth that one party would be obligated to pay the broker's commission; indemnification provisions in the lease agreement do provide evidence
of implied contract
of employment with landlord where landlord agreed to indemnify tenant against brokerage commission claims from all brokers including
plaintiff and where, to the contrary, tenant's reciprocal indemnification excluded
plaintiff; triable issues
of fact exist
as to whether broker was the procuring cause where broker introduced the parties, showed the space to tenant's representatives, was involved in weekly negotiations with the parties over the lease terms, conveyed offers
on behalf of tenant to landlord and participated in the meeting with the landlord and tenant at which the lease terms were finalized