Acting
on behalf of the defendant by counterclaim's subrogating insurance company, Justin Anisman sucesfully dismissed the Allianze's counterclaim on summary judgment motion.
Liability was admitted
on behalf of the Defendant by ICBC»S lawyer.
With respect to the first accident, she commenced legal proceedings, and liability was admitted
on behalf of the Defendant by ICBC»S lawyer.
The actions were consolidated at trial, and liability was admitted
on behalf of both Defendants by ICBC»S lawyer.
Not exact matches
The class action, filed in United States District Court, Southern District
of New York, and docketed under 18 - cv - 02213, is
on behalf of a class consisting
of investors who purchased or otherwise acquired BRF American Depositary Receipts («ADRs») between April 4, 2013 and March 2, 2018, both dates inclusive (the «Class Period»), seeking to recover damages caused
by Defendants» violations
of the federal securities laws and to pursue remedies under Sections 10 (b) and 20 (a)
of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (the «Exchange Act») and Rule 10b - 5 promulgated thereunder, against the Company and certain
of its top officials.
The class action, filed in United States District Court, for the District
of Illinois, Eastern Division, is
on behalf of a class consisting
of investors who purchased or otherwise acquired Akorn's securities between March 1, 2017 through February 26, 2018, both dates inclusive (the «Class Period»), seeking to recover damages caused
by defendants» violations
of the federal securities laws and to pursue remedies under Sections 10 (b) and 20 (a)
of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and Rule 10b - 5 promulgated thereunder, against the Company and certain
of its top officials.
Christopher M. Sulyma filed a lawsuit
on behalf of two proposed classes
of participants in the Intel 401 (k) Savings Plan and the Intel Retirement Contribution Plan, claiming that the
defendants breached their fiduciary duties
by investing a significant portion
of the plans» assets in risky and high - cost hedge fund and private equity investments through custom - built target - date funds.
Plaintiff Christopher M. Sulyma,
on behalf of two proposed classes
of participants in the Intel 401 (k) Savings Plan and the Intel Retirement Contribution Plan, claims that the
defendants breached their fiduciary duties
by investing a significant portion
of the plans» assets in risky and high - cost hedge fund and private equity investments.
Under the terms
of the settlement, $ 150 million will be paid
by TAP
on behalf of all
defendants.
The class action, filed in United States District Court, for the Central District
of California, and docketed under 17 - cv - 09157, is
on behalf of a class consisting
of investors who purchased or otherwise acquired Crypto securities, seeking to recover compensable damages caused
by defendants» violations
of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934.
The class action, filed in United States District Court, Southern District
of New York, and docketed under 17 - cv - 09903, is
on behalf of a class consisting
of investors who purchased or otherwise acquired Qudian's American Depositary Receipts («ADRs») pursuant and / or traceable to Qudian's false and misleading Registration Statement and Prospectus, issued in connection with the Company's initial public offering
on or about October 18, 2017 (the «IPO» or the «Offering»), seeking to recover damages caused
by Defendants» violations
of the Securities Act
of 1933 (the «Securities Act»).
The Enrollment Program also authorizes a superior court to have jurisdiction over enrollees
by allowing it to «appoint a receiver, monitor, conservator, or other designated fiduciary or officer
of the court for a
defendant or the
defendant's assets,» as well as authorizes the Commissioner
of Business Oversight to «include in civil actions claims for ancillary relief, including restitution and disgorgement,
on behalf of a person injured, as well as attorney's fees and costs, and civil penalties
of up to $ 25,000» for up to four years after the purported violation occurred and «refer evidence regarding violations
of the bill's provisions to the Attorney General, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network
of the United States Department
of the Treasury, or the district attorney
of the county in which the violation occurred, who would be authorized, with or without this type
of a reference, to institute appropriate proceedings.»
The class action, filed in United States District Court, for the Southern District
of New York, and docketed under 18 - cv - 00646, is
on behalf of a class consisting
of investors who purchased or otherwise acquired Xunlei securities, seeking to recover compensable damages caused
by defendants» violations
of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934.
The plaintiff is seeking: A declaration that upon a true and proper interpretation
of the provisions
of the 1992 Constitution, particularly Articles 88 (5), 218 (a) and (e), 284 and 287 thereof, the 1st
defendant can not act as the legal representative for Honourable Kenneth Nana Yaw Ofori Atta, the Minister of Finance of the Republic of Ghana, in a pending investigation bordering on conflict of interest and abuse of office before the 2nd Defendant; A further declaration that the purported response filed by the 1st Defendant on behalf of the said Honorable Kenneth Nana Yaw Ofori Atta in respect of the petition concerning conflict of interest and abuse of office before the 2nd Defendant is unconstitutional, null and void and of no effect wh
defendant can not act as the legal representative for Honourable Kenneth Nana Yaw Ofori Atta, the Minister
of Finance
of the Republic
of Ghana, in a pending investigation bordering
on conflict
of interest and abuse
of office before the 2nd
Defendant; A further declaration that the purported response filed by the 1st Defendant on behalf of the said Honorable Kenneth Nana Yaw Ofori Atta in respect of the petition concerning conflict of interest and abuse of office before the 2nd Defendant is unconstitutional, null and void and of no effect wh
Defendant; A further declaration that the purported response filed
by the 1st
Defendant on behalf of the said Honorable Kenneth Nana Yaw Ofori Atta in respect of the petition concerning conflict of interest and abuse of office before the 2nd Defendant is unconstitutional, null and void and of no effect wh
Defendant on behalf of the said Honorable Kenneth Nana Yaw Ofori Atta in respect
of the petition concerning conflict
of interest and abuse
of office before the 2nd
Defendant is unconstitutional, null and void and of no effect wh
Defendant is unconstitutional, null and void and
of no effect whatsoever;
The
defendant, in the suit filed
on his
behalf by a human rights lawyer, Mr Ebun Olu - Adegboruwa, joined the EFCC and the Attorney - General
of the Federation as respondents.
In the suit filed
on his
behalf by his lawyer, Olukoya Ogungbeje, Evans listed the Inspector - General
of Police, Ibrahim Idris, and three others as
defendants.
A copy
of the suit said: «This honourable court will be moved
by Gary Nimako Marfo ESQ., counsel for and
on behalf of plaintiff / applicants herein praying for an order
of interlocutory injunction to restrain
defendants / respondents, whether
by themselves, agents, servants, workmen, hirelings, privies or any person claiming under or through them or howsoever described, from holding out the second
defendant / respondent, [as] the parliamentary candidate - elect for Klottey Korle constituency.»
A copy
of the suit, which is available to ClassFMonline.com said: «This honourable court will be moved
by Gary Nimako Marfo ESQ., counsel for and
on behalf of plaintiff / applicants herein praying for an order
of interlocutory injunction to restrain
defendants / respondents, whether
by themselves, agents, servants, workmen, hirelings, privies or any person claiming under or through them or howsoever described, from holding out the second
defendant / respondent, [as] the parliamentary candidate - elect for Klottey Korle constituency.»
The Acting Chairman
of the Commission, Hon. Abdullahi Bako, who made the presentation
on behalf of the Commission explained that the amendment had become necessary given the fact that the Commission is restricted
by its extant law to prosecute cases only in State High courts which has hampered its prosecutorial effectiveness because high profile
defendants often wield substantial influence within a state.
Justice Abang further directed INEC and the PDP to «reject and ignore any activity including primary elections / congresses for the nomination
of candidates for the gubernatorial elections in Edo and Ondo states, purportedly conducted
on behalf of the 2nd
defendant (PDP)
by any other persons or group
of persons other than the Sheriff group.»
Delivering ruling in the no - case submission argued
by Mr. Rickey Tarfa (SAN)
on behalf of Ndume, Justice Kolawole held that the prosecution failed in all fronts to link the
defendant with the alleged heinous crime
of hoarding information
on terrorism activities and sponsorship the Boko Haram Islamic sect.
Torlakson: As the top education official in the state, Torlakson was a
defendant in the lawsuit and led the charge
on behalf of the state to appeal the ruling with a statement that the judge's decision is «not supported
by the facts or the law.»
The lawsuit brings eight counts against the
defendants by Adkins and
on behalf of all consumers who purchased the chicken jerky dog treats.
Plaintiff Oceana, Inc. («Oceana»)
on behalf of its adversely affected members hereby challenges the unlawful decision
of the National Marine Fisheries Service («Fisheries Service» or «
Defendants») to adopt and promulgate Amendment 5b to the Highly Migratory Species («HMS») Fishery Management Plan because it failed to establish measures necessary to end overfishing and rebuild the dusky shark population to a healthy level as mandated
by the Magnuson - Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act («Magnuson - Stevens Act»).
It is impossible to imagine how the requirements
of a trial management conference can be accomplished
by an adjuster appearing
on behalf of the
defendants, as may be the request in this requisition.
In a ruling written
by justices Michael Moldaver, Andromache Karakatsanis, and Russell Brown,
on behalf of a unanimous nine - judge panel, the court sides with the
defendant in ruling that his constitutional right to a reasonably timely trial had been violated.
Inc. 2014 NLTD (G) 114 Actions — Contracts — Courts — Criminal Law — Practice — Restitution — Torts — Trade Regulation Summary: The two individual plaintiffs sought to bring a class action against Atlantic Lottery Corp. (
defendant),
on behalf of a class
of persons harmed
by video lottery terminals (VLTs).
The statement
of adjustments prepared
by the
defendant solicitor
on behalf of the plaintiff was questioned and attacked
by the opposite party in a real estate transaction.
Dan's business litigation included defending a truck manufacturer in suits
by disgruntled dealers, the defense
of numerous officers and directors
of failed savings and loans, a recovery for limited partners in a franchise who were misled
by a franchisor, defense
of libel actions, trade secret litigation
on behalf of both plaintiffs and
defendants, lease covenant disputes for commercial tenants
of shopping centers, and business partnership disputes.
As one lawyer (among many lawyers) who has made these points repeatedly
on behalf many
defendants who seem much more deserving
of sympathy than Mr. Libby — such as decorated veteran Victor Rita who just had his 33 month sentence affirmed
by the Supreme Court for crimes seemingly much less serious than Libby's — I suppose I am pleased to see President Bush demonstrate compassionate conservativism for Libby.
Appeared in the Court
of Appeal
on behalf of a director
of Defendant company who was found
by the first instance judge to have participated in a conspiracy to defraud the Claimant insurance companies: QBE and Markel v Surety Guarantee and Higgs [2009] EWCA Civ 790.
Father Baldwin was appointed
by and
on behalf of the
Defendants.
The statements attributed to Mr. Harding in the Vancouver Sun article were critical
of Dr. Amrit Toor, an expert witness who testified at the trial
on behalf of the
defendants,» said the recent Supreme Court ruling
by Justice G. Bruce Butler.
Those features may have relevance in a different context, but not to the question
of whether, in justice, the
Defendants should be responsible for the tortious acts
of the man appointed and authorised
by them to act
on their
behalf.
An order, under s 19 (1)
of the Prosecution
of Offences Act 1985, for costs incurred as a result
of an unnecessary or improper act or omission
by or
on behalf of a prosecutor may be made to compensate an unrepresented
defendant for his own loss
of time in preparing his case and attending court.
The lawsuit, which was filed
on behalf of two Maryland residents
by personal injury attorneys, claims that Apple and AT&T knew about the design and manufacturing defects
of the product before the product was released to consumers and that the
defendants have failed to provide customer support
on the issue.
In Hurrell - Harring, the New York Civil Liberties Union sued
on behalf of 20 indigent
defendants, arguing that the state's failure to adequately fund or oversee their local indigent defense offices violated their Sixth Amendment rights
by leaving them with extremely poor representation.
This is a proposed class action seeking, among other things, overtime pay
on behalf of unlicensed Audit Associates and Senior Associates in California employed
by the
defendant.
Spliethoff's Bevrachtingskantoor B.V. v Bank
of China [2015] EWHC 999 (Comm): Chris was instructed
on behalf of the Claimant in this action in which his clients claimed payment under 2 guarantees provided
by the
Defendant.
[1] This endorsement deals with the costs
of a motion heard
on June 11, 2012 to set aside or vary an order made
by me
on January 4, 2012 to compel two neuropsychological examinations
of the plaintiff Steve Moore, one
on behalf of the
defendant Bertuzzi and one
on behalf of the Orca Bay
defendants.
[106] I conclude that,
on a proper construction
of PIPEDA, if the primary activity or conduct at hand, in this case the collection
of evidence
on a plaintiff
by an individual
defendant in order to mount a defence to a civil tort action, is not a commercial activity contemplated
by PIPEDA, then that activity or conduct remains exempt from PIPEDA even if third parties are retained
by an individual to carry out that activity or conduct
on his or her
behalf.
[154] It is now submitted
on behalf of the
defendant in this civil action that the issue
of liability has been decided in his favour
by the previous criminal proceedings.
SCCJC legislation would require claimants, during discovery in state asbestos tort actions involving a solvent
defendant, to disclose asbestos trust claims that have been submitted or could be submitted
on behalf of a plaintiff to an asbestos trust entity established
by a U.S. Bankruptcy Court.
«I thought you would like to know that the excellent research assistance provided to me
by Anne Hemenway
of your firm enabled me to write a storng and convincing Memorandum
of Law in support
of the motion to dismiss
on behalf of my
defendant client....
Berger & Montague, P.C. has filed a class action in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District
of Pennsylvania
on behalf of all persons who held short call option positions
on «in the money» call options contracts
on dividend paying stocks and exchange traded funds («ETFs») and who were adversely affected
by Defendants» manipulation
of the options markets prior to the ex-dividend date
on such securities from February 6, 2010 through the present (the «Class Period»).
Pearson, Simon & Warshaw attorneys obtained a nationwide settlement as class counsel
on behalf a nationwide class
of consumers who purchased DVDs manufactured
by defendants.
Served as lead counsel for the
defendant and achieved a defense verdict
on behalf of a debtor bank holding company following an advisory jury trial involving a claim
by the FDIC for more than US$ 500 million.
All Claims are brought
by, or
on behalf of, former Iraqi employees
of the
Defendants in Iraq, and all those contracted via third parties to offer services to the
Defendants in Iraq between 2003 and 2009 and seek damages from one or more
of the
Defendants alleged injuries and / or financial losses caused
by the alleged failure
of one or more
of the
Defendants to adequately protect them or their Deceased relatives from risk
of threats and / or injury from those opposed to the
Defendants» presence in Iraq.
Whether the management
by the
Defendant of the Nant - Y - Gwyddon landfill site since March 1995 constituted a nuisance to the Claimants and / or negligence
on behalf of the
Defendant
Rob Hyndman tells us that 10 days after launch Avvo was made the
defendant in a class action brought
by and
on behalf of... lawyers.