Not exact matches
God keep our land Prayer borrowed from the Canadian national anthem, a country founded and run
on biblical principles and
doctrine.
You hit the nail squarely
on the head for indeed so,
biblical truths are «written
on our heart» by way of the Presence of Christ's Indwelt Spirit Who is ever faithful to «guide you into all truth» and «show (us) things to come» (John 16:13) but the problem is (as is woefully evident with this Article \ s Author), too many people (believers) choose to eschew or disregard «sound
doctrine» (2 Timothy 4:3) promulgating John 14:17 ignorance of the Doctrine of The Holy Spirit whose inevitable product is a darkened understanding (such as is evidenced by the Article's Author
doctrine» (2 Timothy 4:3) promulgating John 14:17 ignorance of the
Doctrine of The Holy Spirit whose inevitable product is a darkened understanding (such as is evidenced by the Article's Author
Doctrine of The Holy Spirit whose inevitable product is a darkened understanding (such as is evidenced by the Article's Author --RRB-.
Who would be interested in a book supporting and trying to gain acceptance for the
doctrine based
on biblical and historical evidence that Jesus died
on March 25, 31 CE, at 15.00 hours,
on a TUESDAY and was resurrected by His Father, Yahweh God, at about 18.00 hours,
on a FRIDAY, thus fulfilling His own prophecy contained in Mat 12:40, whereas He would be three days and three nights in the tomb?
Obviously, there are some solid
doctrines to stand
on, but I've seen the heresy label thrown at far too little things, especially with far too little
Biblical support.
I still believe these things to be true and
biblical, but I am now aware of different ways of approaching these
doctrines which require further study
on my part.
If the
doctrine itself is not explicit in the Bible, and if its implications are not admitted in the Bible, it is hard to see how the
doctrine can be defended
on the basis of
Biblical revelation.
More will be said
on the
Biblical view of man later, but it is sufficient to point out here, that it is just because the Bible hardly anywhere reflects a
doctrine of an immortal soul, that the Christian hope took the form of the resurrection of the body.
, A New Take
on 2 Timothy 3:16, Is the
Doctrine of Inspiration
Biblical?)
Much emphasis was placed
on the importance of building a strong foundation, which usually involved employing materials like the «concrete» of absolute truth, the «joists» of
biblical inerrancy, and the «bearing walls» of Christian
doctrine.
The word
doctrine is therefore being used in a way that is flexible enough to accommodate the variety of
biblical teaching
on these and other subjects as well as the factor of development in some themes as we move from the Old Testament into the New Testament.
Thank you for sharing your view
on «predestination» — I googled this due to my troubled spirit resulting from having a precious sister in Christ — extremely brilliant student of
Biblical theology, etc. — verbally wipe me out with shaking finger in face, followed by multiple disturbing emails just short of accusing me of apostacy due to my view
on this
doctrine — my view is the same as yours.
A more sophisticated screening of Scripture is carried out by others who claim that we must look in Scripture for the «locus classicus» of a
Biblical doctrine and concentrate
on its teaching, interpreting all else in light of its truth.
Process theologians can share with other critics in pointing out that classical theism developed its
doctrines on assumptions derived from Greek rather that
biblical thought.
A note
on the Scriptural references: Because this paper deals with our understanding of Scripture and challenges the traditionally held position and
doctrines, I have made an effort to give
biblical references where appropriate.
While Evangelicals find no
biblical warrant for the
doctrine of Purgatory, we together affirm with Paul, «If the work which any man has built
on the foundation survives, he will receive a reward.
Even so,
on biblical and pious grounds, some Christians challenged the
doctrine of divine impassibility.
In fairness, the creationists Kitcher had in mind are
biblical fundamentalists who want to attack orthodox scientific
doctrine on a broad front.
Keller ties a little bow
on that section of the message saying that the
doctrine of hell «can be used to create a pretext for cruelty,» but that the «
biblical doctrine of hell» is that Jesus came «not to bring judgment but to bear judgment and to go to hell for his enemies.»
In John Baillie's widely acclaimed modern classic, And the Life Everlasting, the
biblical doctrine of the resurrection has almost moved out of sight, being replaced by an emphasis
on eternal life as a quality of life which transcends death.
At the same time Niebuhr felt that these two
biblical teachings about man gave significance to his
doctrine of man's finiteness and nature
on the one hand and man's freedom of spirit
on the other.
Campolo says there's a world of podcasts, books, events and more aimed at young evangelicals who are re-thinking historic evangelical
doctrines on hell, sovereignty,
biblical infallibility, sexuality etc..
Exclusive concern with divine power, however, distorts the texture of
biblical experience, which does not systematically articulate a series of
doctrines carefully correlated with one another, such that each may safely be considered
on its own merits.
Christian theology needs to have a special treatise
on revelation if for no other reason than to emphasize the indispensable
biblical doctrine of the prevenience of God's promissory vision for our lives and the world.
We are told that Bruce Reichenbach is an example of such a FWT in that he «says that he rests his belief in the omnipotence of God solely
on the fact that this
doctrine is implied by various
biblical statements» (ER 50).
Fudge is the author of The Fire That Consumes: A
Biblical and Historical Study of the
Doctrine of Final Punishment, the book Christianity Today identified as the standard reference
on conditionalism.
A new approach to theology is needed, one which focuses
on the
Biblical text, and emphasizes both
doctrine and practice.
Perhaps those who insist
on «doctrinal purity» (to their
doctrine /
Biblical interpretation / opinions) are the real heretics.
The vocal insistence of the religious right
on biblical «creationism» and such
doctrines as the inerrancy of the Bible is likely to create a one - sided impression of the Christian faith and to turn away people who are not aware of other Christian views.
The central
biblical doctrines is that God is
on the side of the poor and the oppressed.
But if we do mean it, then we must teach and live, in a world full of injustice and starvation, the important
biblical doctrine that God and his faithful people are
on the side of the poor and oppressed.
Christians committed to historic,
biblical doctrine on sexuality should be disposed to approve of efforts to make orthodoxy clear, unequivocal, and pastoral.
And of course there is Benedict's Deus Caritas Est, itself a set of meditations
on the meaning of the
biblical doctrine that God is love and
on the implications of that theme for man's erotic nature.
The Western Protestant experience, which included church splits and the formation of new denominations
on the basis of national, ethnic and class differences — as well as differences of
doctrine, sacramental practice and
biblical interpretation — had been exported to the mission fields, where many of these differences seemed to be of even less enduring significance than they were at home.
The person who wrote this obviously does nt know the first thing about Christianity or
Biblical Doctrine on Sex.
A corresponding effect of the stress
on non-
biblical issues is that important
biblical issues, particularly the
doctrine of depravity and the child's need for regeneration, do not, in our opinion, receive sufficient emphasis.
The foundation of Christianity doesn't rest
on the
doctrine of
biblical inerrancy.