If only there were such an abundance of careful studies
on biblical ethics, we would find ourselves in the luxurious position of highlighting the helpful approaches, discarding...
Not exact matches
But my experience and from things I read, even
on this blog site, most, not all, but most don't like Churches teaching
biblical morals and
ethics.
Or will those churches now complete their sectarian withdrawal from the arena of public debate as their theologians and activists go
on speaking to themselves as though they were living 350 years ago and economics were just a branch of
biblical ethics?
But I have the impression, this «enlightened» Christianity is not able any more to formulate its genuine Christian
ethics on biblical grounds.
As in other cases, Rowan Williams is characteristic: his theology is deeply informed by Luther, Schleiermacher, Barth, Rahner, von Balthasar, Bonhoeffer and other continental Europeans, besides theologies from other parts of the world, and his recent book
On Christian Theology covers theological method,
biblical hermeneutics, creation, sin, Jesus Christ, incarnation, church, sacraments,
ethics and eschatology, with the Trinity as the integrator.
p.s.a full systematic view of my view of
biblical ethics and the christian tradition would require a face - to - face or a completely separate post
on these
ethics.
The accent in appropriation should perhaps fall much more
on the fundamental values in
biblical ethics than
on the specific moral norms and directives that we meet
on the surface level of the text.
American studies,
biblical literature and Reinhold Niebuhr's social
ethics focus
on careerism, are issues consuming attention
on American campuses, especially at predominantly women's colleges.
On the basis of my own work in descriptive
biblical ethics I can tentatively suggest a different avenue for this normative question than has been taken so far.
Using
biblical stories told by and about Jesus as his starting point, Cox offers a series of wide - ranging reflections
on everything from the
ethics of in vitro fertilization to the
biblical accuracy of the Left Behind novels.
We read the Bible «through the Jesus lens» — which looks suspiciously like it means using the parts of the Gospels that we like, with the awkward bits carefully screened out, which enables us to disagree with the
biblical texts
on God, history,
ethics and so
on, even when Jesus didn't (Luke 17:27 - 32 is an interesting example).
He accepted the historical - critical method of
biblical studies, rejected some traditional theological claims
on the basis of their incredibility to a critical mind, assumed a religious optimism, championed individualism, accepted evolutionary categories, emphasized
ethics, stressed the humanity of Jesus, and recognized the importance of toleration.
For a
Biblical concept of justice has been the real concern of a few of these writers.58 Evidence is of course mixed, but the overwhelming thrust of Scripture's discussion of «social justice» suggests the following
Biblical definition: «to each according to his or her needs» Rather than act
on the basis of society's most common definitions of «social justice» those of merit or equality - the Christian seeking a Biblically derived social
ethic must respond, first and foremost,
on the basis of need.
It is my contention that St. Thomas» synthesis of
biblical ethics and the metaphysics of being so transformed Aristotle that semi-Thomistic retrievals of Aristotle, such as MacIntyre's treatise
on Dependent Rational Animals, are bound to regress behind Aquinas.
David Hubbard, for example, in his taped remarks
on the future of evangelicalism to a colloquium at Conservative Baptist Theological Seminary in Denver in 1977 noted the following areas of tension among evangelicals: women's ordination, the charismatic movement, ecumenical relations, social
ethics, strategies of evangelism,
Biblical criticism,
Biblical infallibility, contextual theology in non-Western cultures, and the churchly applications of the behavioral sciences.2 If such a list is more exhaustive than those topics which this book has pursued, it nevertheless makes it clear that the foci of the preceding chapters have at least been representative.
The writings of Harold Lindsell, Francis Schaefer, Bernard Ramm, Carl Henry, Clark Pinnock, Dick France, James Packer and others present a range of contradictory theological formulations
on such issues as the nature of
Biblical inspiration, the place of women in the church and family, the church's role in social
ethics, and the Christian's response to homosexuality.
As we turn in the next chapter to consider the evangelical church's role in society, we will see that matters of a correct theological understanding of social
ethics - one resting in
Biblical authority - do not hinge so much
on the issue of
Biblical hermeneutics as they do
on the matter of conflicting loyalties to ecclesiological traditions.
Evangelicals, all claiming a common
Biblical norm, are reaching contradictory theological formulations
on many of the major issues they address — the nature of
Biblical inspiration, the place of women in the church and family, the church's role in social
ethics, and most recently the Christian's response to homosexuality.
A Christian
ethic must reconsider the
biblical outlook
on relation of love and justice.
People are rising to the
biblical call to «welcome the stranger,» an indispensable
ethic for anyone choosing to follow Jesus of Nazareth, who once set out
on the refugee trail himself.
The Bible knows only a love
ethic, which is constantly being brought to bear
on whatever sexual mores are dominant in any given country, or culture, or period» («
Biblical Perspectives
on Homosexuality,» The Christian Century, November 7, 1979)
American Catholic history may not be so booming a discipline as
biblical studies or medical
ethics, but even the most cursory survey of the American Catholic Studies Newsletter (published by the Cushwa Center for the study of American Catholicism at the University of Notre Dame, itself an institutional expression of the growth of the field) reveals an extraordinary breadth of research, ranging from classic institutional histories and biographies of key figures to the new social history, with its emphases
on patterns of community, spirituality, family life, and education.
Though such successive innovations in theological study as the social gospel, social
ethics, religious education, psychological counseling and ecumenical relations may receive much publicity the schools seem to go
on their accustomed way, teaching what they have always taught:
Biblical and systematic theology, church history and preaching.
Our Christian counseling includes providing services based
on Biblical truths and
ethics, as well as applying our God - given gifts of love, understanding, teaching, healing, knowledge, helping and wisdom.