Our Christian counseling includes providing services based
on Biblical truths and ethics, as well as applying our God - given gifts of love, understanding, teaching, healing, knowledge, helping and wisdom.
And he is at his usual best here, casting fresh light
on biblical truths, engaging readers with the compelling metaphor, turning the arresting phrase, and reminding all that the love of God is more powerful and sweeping than we can imagine.
We live in a time where taking a stand, especially
on biblical truths, is looked down upon.
It is based
on Biblical truths.
O'Donovan was our Erasmus Lecturer last year, and that was the occasion of a very lively and productive exchange
on biblical truth and the right ordering of society.
David Robertson argues that Tim Farron's resignation proves the Church needs to take a firmer stance
on biblical truth More
Organized religions like Catholicism, Mormonism, Lutherism... pretty much anything ending in ISM follow many man made policies and traditions that have no basis
on Biblical truth.
I had to get past the hurt though and stand firm
on the biblical truth that fundamentalism represents and the finished work of the cross in spite of everything seeeming to go south in my life.
Not exact matches
You are either intentionally or ignorantly — both then and now, i.e., 13 years later — are depriving those patients whom whom God of love is putting in your path to use your divinity school knowledge and your
biblical faith experience to guide the path of that talk towards the absolute
truth related to the love of God — i.e. true love which stems from God by giving his only Son for whoever to choose to believe
on him to have «everlasting life» by having his / her sins forgiven.
You hit the nail squarely
on the head for indeed so,
biblical truths are «written
on our heart» by way of the Presence of Christ's Indwelt Spirit Who is ever faithful to «guide you into all
truth» and «show (us) things to come» (John 16:13) but the problem is (as is woefully evident with this Article \ s Author), too many people (believers) choose to eschew or disregard «sound doctrine» (2 Timothy 4:3) promulgating John 14:17 ignorance of the Doctrine of The Holy Spirit whose inevitable product is a darkened understanding (such as is evidenced by the Article's Author --RRB-.
In fact, by failing to do so, you become a culprit by not probing their minds to make sure that whether they are aware of this
biblical truth and hence being perished and away from that everlasting love for eternity — and for this very reason and negligence or misguidance, you will be responsible and accountable when you meet with your creator God of love whom he also loved you so much that if you were the only person living
on the face of this earth and planet, still he would have come and died for you and the forgiveness of your since and loving you unconditional.
Revisiting late medieval
biblical interpretation, we may consider the delicacy of the hermeneutic circle formed by Scripture and tradition, appreciating the fragility of a synthesis that refuses to impose
on ancient consensus a linear, hierarchical path to
truth.
You are relying
on the «
truth» of
biblical writings.
And to say that
Biblical teachings are invalid because there are other similar beliefs that have older known written sources invalidates the Biblical teachings also should take into consideration that for certain Biblical believers that all those truths whether they are known to have been placed in the Bible first or known thus far to have been placed elsewhere that they believe that they all come via deity who at the beginning of human history on this world dispensed those truths to humanity and that to those who believe in the biblical teachings believe that through time they are more complete than those of other ancient beliefs due to God restoring those truths through revelations given to later prophets like say Moses and other later Old and New Testament prophets and a
Biblical teachings are invalid because there are other similar beliefs that have older known written sources invalidates the
Biblical teachings also should take into consideration that for certain Biblical believers that all those truths whether they are known to have been placed in the Bible first or known thus far to have been placed elsewhere that they believe that they all come via deity who at the beginning of human history on this world dispensed those truths to humanity and that to those who believe in the biblical teachings believe that through time they are more complete than those of other ancient beliefs due to God restoring those truths through revelations given to later prophets like say Moses and other later Old and New Testament prophets and a
Biblical teachings also should take into consideration that for certain
Biblical believers that all those truths whether they are known to have been placed in the Bible first or known thus far to have been placed elsewhere that they believe that they all come via deity who at the beginning of human history on this world dispensed those truths to humanity and that to those who believe in the biblical teachings believe that through time they are more complete than those of other ancient beliefs due to God restoring those truths through revelations given to later prophets like say Moses and other later Old and New Testament prophets and a
Biblical believers that all those
truths whether they are known to have been placed in the Bible first or known thus far to have been placed elsewhere that they believe that they all come via deity who at the beginning of human history
on this world dispensed those
truths to humanity and that to those who believe in the
biblical teachings believe that through time they are more complete than those of other ancient beliefs due to God restoring those truths through revelations given to later prophets like say Moses and other later Old and New Testament prophets and a
biblical teachings believe that through time they are more complete than those of other ancient beliefs due to God restoring those
truths through revelations given to later prophets like say Moses and other later Old and New Testament prophets and apostles.
5:20 - 21 and 1 John 4:1, to not quench the Spirit, to not despise prophecies, but to examine all extrabiblical revelations according to
biblical criteria and test all persons, like the noble Bereans in Acts 17, who «examined the Scriptures daily to see if this were so,» the Calvinists / MacArthurites deleted my post of my testimony
on SO4J's FB timeline — because it threatened them, and they knew I am telling the
truth about an awesome dream of Jesus in 1973, as I emerged from a traumatic childhood with a mother who had worked the Ouija board when I was 11.
And all of it, marked by the courage to take
on the tough questions with both generosity and a deep commitment to
biblical truth.
Because the Bible is the most effective force in history for lifting women to higher levels of respect, dignity, and freedom, we join an historic succession of women whose Christian faith is forged from
biblical truth and whose lives are shaped into Christ's image
on the anvil of obedience.
Apparently many theologians and
biblical scholars fumble with or skirt around the
truth as if the message of life were a proposition or a premise based
on a certain quantity of historical information or a qualitative formula.
«In particular, those who saw in Scripture a sanction for slavery were both more insistent
on pointing to the passages that seemed so transparently to support their position and more confident in decrying the wanton disregard for divine revelation that seemed so willfully to dismiss
biblical truths.»
(2) Boomershine sees historical criticism as the
biblical method of this era, where the
truth of the text is achieved by personal study of the text in silence
on your own.
Misusing Scripture to reinforce gender stereotypes based more
on white, American, post-World War II cultural ideals than
biblical truth doesn't protect women; it harms them.
Much emphasis was placed
on the importance of building a strong foundation, which usually involved employing materials like the «concrete» of absolute
truth, the «joists» of
biblical inerrancy, and the «bearing walls» of Christian doctrine.
Among his publications are: The Scripture Principle, Harper & Row, 1984; Reason Enough: A Case for the Christian Faith, InterVarsity Press, 1980; (editor) Grace Unlimited, Bethany Fellowship, 1975;
Truth on Fire, The Message of Galatians, Baker Book House, 1972,
Biblical Revelation, Moody Press, 1971, Set Forth Your Case, Craig, 1968; and A Defense of
Biblical Infallibility, Presbyterian and Reformed, 1967.
A wise interpreter would set this verse aside as too vague and unclear
on this particular issue and seek
Biblical truth on this subject in the clear passages throughout the Bible that teach that God does not hold children to account for the sins of their parents!
If the church's theology were informed more by
biblical expectations of a redeemed creation and less by general religious longings for ecstatic experience and timeless
truth, Christians would find themselves at the very least congenial toward those who, with a passionate «loyalty to things» and a «cosmic act of allegiance,» struggle to unpack the secrets of life
on this planet and to work with it toward a new day.
Along with Derrida's deconstruction, Michel Foucault's study of the complex nature of power and
truth and Fredric Jameson's neo-Marxist analysis of ideology have been deeply influential
on postmodernism in
biblical studies.
I think the visible Church is steadily crawling out
on a limb that is not supported by
Biblical truth, and when it snaps the fall and fall out will be great.
Many postliberals acknowledge that their positions
on the historicity of
biblical narrative and the religious
truth contained in non-Christian religions are compatible with liberalism.
In these studies Buber leads us
on a narrow ridge between the traditionalist's insistence
on the literal
truth of the
biblical narrative and the modern critic's tendency to regard this narrative as of merely literary or symbolic significance.
It also led to the ascendance of
biblical criticism (relativizing, to a certain extent, the Holy Scriptures), which in turn had negative influences
on theology, generating a questioning attitude about the objectivity of established
truth and the usefulness of defending ecclesial traditions and institutions.
By focusing
on individual conversions apart from traditional church authorities that had, even for Protestants, provided the context for the communication of
biblical truth, the revivals encouraged individuals to appropriate Scripture for their own purposes.
A third danger to evangelical theology brought
on by inadequate reflection at the point of methodology is theology's tendency to reflect current opinion rather than
Biblical truth.
A more sophisticated screening of Scripture is carried out by others who claim that we must look in Scripture for the «locus classicus» of a
Biblical doctrine and concentrate
on its teaching, interpreting all else in light of its
truth.
Its in the Bible clearly, but since many these days are seeking to be validated, many are willing to ignore clear
Biblical truths on the subject matter.
This is crazy to see that so many are seeking to obliterate
Biblical truths these days to embrace a behavior God has already passed judgment
on in the first place.
The challenge with competing worldviews is that there are fragments of similarities to some Christian teachings, and some may recognize and latch
on to these ideas, not realizing they are distortions of
biblical truths.
The only time you'll find any controversy
on the 4 language theory is here in the States where
Biblical research is hopelessly mired in denominationalism and not
truth.
The alleged subordination of the gospel to Karl Marx is illustrated, for example, by charging that «false» liberation theology concentrates too much
on a few selected
biblical texts that are always given a political meaning, leading to an overemphasis
on «material» poverty and neglecting other kinds of poverty; that this leads to a «temporal messianism» that confuses the Kingdom of God with a purely «earthly» new society, so that the gospel is collapsed into nothing but political endeavor; that the emphasis
on social sin and structural evil leads to an ignoring or forgetting of the reality of personal sin; that everything is reduced to praxis (the interplay of action and reflection) as the only criterion of faith, so that the notion of
truth is compromised; and that the emphasis
on communidades de base sets a so - called «people's church» against the hierarchy.
It must be stressed, however, that it is not necessary to refute Darwinism
on scientific grounds in order to maintain the religious
truth claims expressed in the
biblical account of history: e.g., God's sovereignty and creative initiative, man's free will, his unique dignity in the universe, and his supernatural end.
The
truth is that we have no business trying to impose our falsely fabricated morality
on other people by claiming it is «
biblical» when (1) it is not
biblical and (2) when we don't follow it ourselves.
For far from being a deviation from
biblical truth, this setting of man over against the sum total of things, his subject - status and the object - status and mutual externality of things themselves, are posited in the very idea of creation and of man's position vis - a-vis nature determined by it: it is the condition of man meant in the Bible, imposed by his createdness, to be accepted, acted through... In short, there are degrees of objectification... the question is not how to devise an adequate language for theology, but how to keep its necessary inadequacy transparent for what is to be indicated by it...» Hans Jonas, Phenomenon of Life, pp. 258 - 59; cf. also Schubert Ogden's helpful discussion
on «Theology and Objectivity,» Journal of Religion 45 (1965): 175 - 95; Ian G. Barbour, Issues in Science and Religion (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice - Hall, 1966), pp. 175 - 206; and Michael Polanyi, Personal Knowledge (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962).
But I think it would be more helpful all round if readers gave him the benefit of the doubt that he is not anti intellectual or anti scripture but making a bona fide encouragement to godliness in life and action based
on sufficient knowledge of
biblical truth.
«Christ - esteem» people still have feelings about themselves, but base them not
on worldly standards, but
Biblical truth.
As earlier with regard to poetic discourse
on the objective side of the idea of revelation, so too
on the subjective side, the experience of testimony can only provide the horizon for a specifically religious and
biblical experience of revelation, without our ever being able to derive that experience from the purely philosophical categories of
truth as manifestation and reflection as testimony.
But when the immense age of the earth became clearly evident
on geological grounds, most fundamentalists tried to defend the «
truth» of the
biblical story by interpreting the six days as six geological ages, thousands or even millions of years in length.
-------- Faithless, there are way too many critics of the Bible and
biblical truths to jump into every car they drive to go for a never ending ride like Charlie
on the MTA.
Finally, the writer [apparently] operates
on the mistaken view that if we can only get at least 51 percent of the voting populace to be swayed sufficiently by our coalesced, power structure, emotional appeals, and
biblical truth (used only where it will work), then we can pass laws outlawing abortion.
This book or workbook is designed to teach the person some basic
biblical and theological
truths as well as some instruction
on basic Christian disciplines like praying, reading the Bible, attending church, and tithing.
If he had to use his gifts one -
on - one, it would take hundreds of hours of week to disseminate the same
biblical truth.
You say It's really disappointing to see someone who rides
on the notion of unity and
truth of scripture to use little to no logical,
biblical or historical proof to make a sound case against what many do see as overly harsh.