Most women know all too well that being
on birth control means having to put up with a few side effects, including potential weight gain, nausea, and mood changes.
Not exact matches
I may be Catholic, but I'm not a maniac about it, runs their unofficial subtext —
meaning: I'm happy to take credit for enlightened Catholic positions
on the death penalty / social justice / civil rights, but of course I don't believe in those archaic teachings about divorce / homosexuality / and above all
birth control.
Because the
birth control cases all focus
on a 1993 federal law, the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, not the Constitution, the Justices will face questions about whether the mandate to provide free access to 20 forms of
birth control drugs or devices, sterilization, screenings, and counseling imposes a «substantial burden»
on religious freedom of nonprofit employers with religious objections to some or all contraceptives, whether the mandate in fact serves a «compelling interest» of the government, and whether an attempt to provide an exemption from the mandate satisfies the requirement that such an accommodation is «the least restrictive
means» of achieving the government's policy interest.
I consider myself Catholic and although I disagree with many of the Church teachings that are based
on dogma, like
birth control, etc., Maybe it is the way I was taught what being a Catholic
means but I would not nor have I ever considered changing religions.
It is time the church stayed out of the bedroom and educated themselves
on the true benefits of
birth control (not just
meant to prevent pregnancy but then again maybe ensuring a woman's health is protected in other ways
means nothing to you).
1) Charities spend their income
on necessities, such as food and utilities, which ever - so - slightly re-orients our economy toward recession - resistant products, rather than luxuries 2) Charities spend their money quickly, but
on independent schedules, making for a smoother stimulus effect
on the economy 3) Charities make purchases tax - free,
meaning that $ 1 spent by a charity generates a full $ 1 of private economic activity; furthermore, much of those tax revenues are recovered as income tax
on the grocery stores, utility companies, etc. that might not have received that income otherwise 4) Charitable giving is by far the most democratic way to improve society; from
birth control to bombers, government assuredly spends money
on something you don't like, and charitable giving restores your say - so 5) Charitable donations are tax deductible,
meaning you keep those tax dollars in your local community 6) Charitable donations provide the funds necessary for volunteers to serve the needy, thus giving «the average citizen» a chance to meet and interact with the needy, breaking down stereotypes
I just want people to show a little more
meaning behind their religious intentions besides making up bs about the government infringing
on their freedoms... grow up, women use
birth control... not a religious issue at all!
I
mean, a little
birth control would
mean we could actually feed most of the people
on the planet, but nah, let's let massive disease and starvation do that for us..
Again — a
birth plan isn't
meant to
control the outcome of your labor, and it's not one more to - do to check from your list; it's
meant to get everyone
on the same page as to what you would and wouldn't like to happen during such a vulnerable experience.
A lot of women believe scheduling an elective cesarean
means they have more
control of what is going
on with the
birth of their child.
The 2 groups were similar
on all measured characteristics, including maternal ethnicity, educational status, age, parity, breastfeeding history, and infant
birth weight (intervention group, 1914.4 g;
control group, 1840 g); gestational age; sex; and length of hospital stay (intervention group,
mean 27.1 days [range, 2 - 81 days];
control group,
mean 25.2 days [range, 1 - 104 days]-RRB-(Table 1).
Fixing the problem could
mean going
on a different type of hormonal
birth control or relying
on a vaginal estrogen cream to rebuild elasticity in vaginal tissue.
While it depends
on the plan and sharing ministry you choose, this typically
means you won't get coverage for certain types of
birth control or any services the group decides are unethical.
Both of these conditions are often treated with hormonal
birth control, which
means these women would be hit the hardest by attacks
on access to
birth control.
That
means the millions of people who depend
on Medicaid and other federal assistance won't be able to turn to Planned Parenthood for their wellness checks,
birth control, and — perhaps most frighteningly — cancer screenings.