Sentences with phrase «on both sides of the debate in»

I don't know where Prof Curry has ever tried to claim that any kind of flaw was more prevalent on «on side of the debate in comparison to the other».

Not exact matches

The company also professed its neutrality in a statement Saturday: «Out of respect for our customers and employees on both sides, Delta has taken this action to refrain from entering this debate and focus on its business.

Unfortunately, it's happening on both sides of the Atlantic, with U.K. politicians debating how to build a next - generation network and Google Fiber rolling out in Kansas.

In its current form, the Ross / Navarro plan has run into criticism from industry experts and economists on both sides of the privatization debate.

What the president told Republicans, in other words, largely echoed the report's findings — and it makes perfect sense he would do so: killing the hype on both sides of the Keystone debate is the first step toward turning the conversation into a civilized exchange that can lead to compromise.

Though his background is in environmental writing, Turner finds blame on both sides of this ever - noisy and nuance - starved debate.

On the other side of the debate, Narayana Kocherlakota, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, argued in a speech on Thursday night that the Fed should not raise rates this year because price inflation remains too loOn the other side of the debate, Narayana Kocherlakota, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, argued in a speech on Thursday night that the Fed should not raise rates this year because price inflation remains too loon Thursday night that the Fed should not raise rates this year because price inflation remains too low.

In fact, many of the issues currently debated on both sides of the Atlantic have been highlighted in EU policy statements on China dating back several yearIn fact, many of the issues currently debated on both sides of the Atlantic have been highlighted in EU policy statements on China dating back several yearin EU policy statements on China dating back several years.

On the positive side, if the Conservative Government does table its proposed legislative aid mandate, it will afford an opportunity for a more open public debate, in which we will have a chance to address the fundamental purposes of the aid program, and how those purposes may be best achieved.

It is somewhat unusual to have the NFL and Senator Rubio wading in to the debate on the side of maintaining Canadian ad substitution, but the reason is not hard to discern.

Using Pakistan as a case study, this article analyzes the ongoing debate and concludes that while there is merit to arguments on both sides, prudent policy recommendations for the governance of the United States» covert drone program fall somewhere in between.

In the past I've written about the content versus links debate where SEOs seem to fall on one side or the other when assigning the majority of importance for search engine rankings.

But so far the debate is dragging on without one side claiming a clear victory, leaving tens of thousands of consumer transactions stranded in limbo.

Before things got nasty, Monday afternoonâ $ ™ s business in the Legislature was a madrigal of harmony as members on both sides of the House debated 21 - year - old MLA Thomas Dangâ $ ™ s (Edmonton - South We...

The new generation is going to put an end to this devious monetary deception and all of the old «Champagne Socialists» sitting in the front of the aircraft debating the horrors of capitalism with two bankers and a parliamentary aide while sipping on bubbly, feet up and caviar on the side table, are ALL in for a very rude awakening.

He's on one side of a long - standing debate in the church about how to build a decent society.

And while I didn't think the administration's policy was very smart on that — I'd been on the losing side in the internal debate — this was the administration's policy and I was coming out of the administration.

The sort of remark I have in mind is the kind where, in a post about an unrelated topic, an author feels the need to bring up some moral accusation against the writer he is discussing and make very clear that he, the blogger, is on the right side of that debate.

The other day I was sitting in a coffee shop and couldn't help overhearing an interesting and intense debate on the other side of the room.

The work he was describing in the seminar was, as the Institute's on - line notice said, an attempt to «cut through both sides of the increasingly polarised debate about how the universe was created, with atheistic Darwinians declaring the death of God, whilst anti-Darwinian creationists denounce evolution as fraud.»

Now of course there are variations in individual presentations on each side, and occasional concessions of specific points provide a certain fluidity to the debate.

I've been on both sides of this so called debate and the atheist side makes perfect sense in this natural world.

In conference opener, Massachusetts Senator tells Christian and Muslim leaders they are on «the right side of the debate.»

To be fair, both sides of the gender debate have been guilty of sliding down a slippery slope, which in my view is unnecessary, given the wealth of excellent resources available to help us accurately interpret Scripture on issues related to gender, sexuality, and faith.

This puts me in a more vulnerable position because 1) it exposes me to the criticisms of people on both sides of the debate, 2) it could lead to serious disappointment, should I find that my intellectual integrity and my faith are indeed incompatible, and 3) it leaves me in the awkward position of being uncertain, undecided, and maybe even a little confused for a while.

I hope, nevertheless, that my comments may indicate why one person at least on this side of the Atlantic (and hence somewhat isolated from the technical expertise, vocabulary, and sometimes apparently frenetic debates of the community of process thinkers) finds in Hartshorne's work «genuine philosophic wisdom,» especially as it develops insights into the logical status and conceptual structure of a theistic understanding of the concept of God.

I learned in seminary that there will always be people more intelligent than me on both sides of that debate.

In the debate between those whose concern is for the richness of the biosphere and those who focus on the relief of suffering of individual animals, we are unwilling to take sides.

They recognized, as United Methodists on either side of the abortion debate have recognized until recently, that the in vitro human embryo makes, at the very least, an iconic moral claim.

If this debate is still being carried on by those whose interpretation of human existence is distorted by what I have called falling off to one side or the other of the ridge, this essay will still be as relevant then as it is today, although the tone of urgency in which it was written will indeed be dated.

«The intrinsic value of human life,» Bailey goes on, «is a given for all sides in this debate.»

It is commonly noted that in any argument the side that determines the terms of debate is already well on the road to victory.

A temporary victory has been declared in a part of the debate conducted on the terms of the other side» the question of utility.

British scholar N. T. Wright, who has engaged in debates with liberal Jesus Seminar leaders, wrote in the August 2001 issue that the huge U.S. success of the «Left Behind» series «appears puzzling, even bizarre» on the other side of the Atlantic.

Those on each side of the debate view themselves as participating in a movement of liberation.

Washington (CNN)-- As the Supreme Court considers two major same - sex marriage cases that could change marriage in the United States, religious leaders on both sides of the debate believe they are on God's side of the contentious issue.

Thus the issues which are being debated anew in the theological turmoil today center in the meaning of Christian love as it points on the one side to the possibilities of human existence, and as it points on the other side to a fulfillment of this life in an ultimate good which transcends the possibilities of this world.

I'm thinking this is a bit more a response than you or I expected and it's partly in response to the number of divisive comments on both sides of the debate that have been posted in this blog.

In spite of the protestations of some on the empirical side of the debate, I see an implicit metaphysics in the most thoroughgoing empiricisIn spite of the protestations of some on the empirical side of the debate, I see an implicit metaphysics in the most thoroughgoing empiricisin the most thoroughgoing empiricism.

Despite the fact that the debate over female ordination will continue, it seems that evangelicals on different sides of that debate could come together about the role of women in para-church organizations.

One of the current debates among process thinkers is the felt need on the part of some to recover the more empirical side of Whitehead's philosophy as well as process thought in general.

But when we see the people on the other side of the debate as the enemy (by calling them names, labeling them or demeaning their convictions), we miss the point of what «fighting for our faith» is supposed to be about in the first place.

On the other side of the social justice debate are those who argue that social justice issues are at the center of the Gospel, and that as we look at the life and ministry of Jesus, we see Him engaged in social justice actions at every turn.

Afraid of being branded as moralists, or even worse, proselytizers, politicians cling to surface arguments that remain in the public's comfort zone, choosing sides in the familiar debates on school prayer, pornography, media immorality and abortion.

You sound just like the people in the dark ages did when they were against civil rights for African Americans and women, you're the one on the wrong side of the moral debate with no facts to back yourselves up.

Though there are a variety of passages which people on both sides of the debate appeal to regarding whether or not it is okay for women to preach in church (e.g., various female «preachers» in the Old Testament like Miriam and Deborah and the female prophetesses in Acts 21:9, and the female apostle in Romans 16:7), two of the main texts in this debate about women preachers and female pastors are 1 Timothy 2:12 and 1 Corinthians 14:34.

As one might expect when it comes to issues of politics in the United States, the debate became almost instantly polarized between pro-gun advocates on one side, and pro-legislation advocates on the other side.

Apart from certain members of the Jesus Seminar (such as John Dominic Crossan and Marcus Borg), the person most visible in the Jesus debate on both sides of the Atlantic (on the BBC, on the lecture circuit, in print, at scholarly meetings and in church settings) has been Nicholas Thomas Wright, formerly of Oxford and now the dean of Lichfield Cathedral in England.

«A many - sided debate about the relations of Christianity and civilization is being carried on in our time.»

Pope Francis has not openly agreed with either side of the debate on divorced Catholics, but he did warn last week against «codifying faith in rules and instructions as did the scribes, the Pharisees and the doctors of law in the time of Jesus».