Sentences with phrase «on both sides of the debate need»

If not, people on both sides of the debate need to admit that Labour is desperately in need of another plan.

Not exact matches

The sort of remark I have in mind is the kind where, in a post about an unrelated topic, an author feels the need to bring up some moral accusation against the writer he is discussing and make very clear that he, the blogger, is on the right side of that debate.

This verse is ambiguous, and all sides of the debate need to understand that we tend to force our theology upon the text to get it to say what we want, rather than allow it to remain ambiguous and move on to other texts which might be more clear.

One of the current debates among process thinkers is the felt need on the part of some to recover the more empirical side of Whitehead's philosophy as well as process thought in general.

People tell me that the system needs people like me, people on the other side of this ministry shift, people who are on the other side of the gender debates and the postmodern movement and so on.

The proper argument is not an abstract debate over the size of government but a debate over how much government we want and need, whose side government is on and what interests government serves.

Regardless of what side of the debate you fall on, children need to know that they are safe, that there are adults in charge and that yes, you have feelings one way or the other about how the election went.

I believe there needs to be more research on both sides of the debate, to safely advocate both options as viable sleeping methods, and so that this parent and doctor based battle can stop.

Westminster Hall debate on the serious issues raised by «Proving Torture», with a number of MPs on all sides joining our call for torture survivors to get the help they need.

It does mean that we need public debate that recognizes the mixed nature of the research findings rather than a rush to judgment based on one - sided and misleading appeals to the preponderance of the evidence.

The wording of the law aside, parties on both sides of the debate think charter reform is needed.

No matter which side of the debate you are on, the fact of the matter is we need to consider the validity of the data we are using to drive instruction.

In the «dry dog food vs. canned debate», dry dog food comes in heavy on the pro side with its ability to help clean a dog's teeth (most dry dog food eaters have better breath than those who chow down the soft variety) ease of storage and handling (dry dog food can be left down for free feeders while wet dog food must be consumed on a schedule) and its ability to provide the necessary chew and crunch that dogs need to be healthy.

We just need to be aware that there are other views that may or may not be as bonkers as contrarian views, way on the other side of the debate (to which environmentalists & worry warts are not invited).

If our hostess really hopes to have a forum where scientists on opposite sides of the CAGW debate can discuss the really important issues, then I would suggest that we need a much better level of participation from the proponents of CAGW.

Lets just say that I sense that both sides of the debate on climate change have biased POV's on any evidence that is placed before them and that a lot more work needs to be done before anyone can claim that the science is settled.

Summary: Fury had the potential to be a good paper, but they needed to address Conspiratorial Ideation on ALL SIDES of the debate.

Both sides in this debate (and I'm firmly on the side of liberalizing regulations concerning the provision of legal services) need to start honestly addressing one single concept that lies at the heart of this argument.

All sides of the debate acknowledge that Bitcoin will ultimately need additional scaling solutions built on top of the protocol layer, and possibly a revision of the funding structure to reward miners.

Rather than the people on each side of this debate demonizing each other, they need to start talking and listening to each other.