These responses include impacts
on calcification rates [18,19], immune function [20], reproduction and carryover effects in larval and juvenile stages of invertebrates [21], enhanced productivity in phytobenthos [22 — 25] but reduced calcification and growth in calcareous algae [26 — 28].
Not exact matches
In addition, reductions in
calcification from lowered pH in surface waters could reduce phytoplankton sinking
rates through loss of ballast (Hofmann and Schellnhuber, 2009), though this effect will depend
on the ratio of the fraction of ballasted vs. un-ballasted fractions of the sinking POC.
In the Nature study you state that previous work has not determined the impact of acidification
on the ability of individual species to calcify because they measured net
calcification (that is, gross
calcification minus dissolution) thus failing to disentangle the relative contributions of gross
calcification (the amount of carbonate deposited by an animal over time) and dissolution
rates.
These may be driven by physiological influences
on the foraminiferal microenvironment; a novel explanation is also suggested for the reduced δ11B - pH sensitivities observed in culture, based
on variable
calcification rates.
Since you state that a decrease in net
calcification could result from a decrease in gross
calcification, an increase in dissolution
rates, or both, you distinguish between these responses and get to the conclusion that the impact of ocean acidification
on a creature's net
calcification may be largely controlled by the status of its protective organic cover and that the net slowdown in skeletal growth under increased CO2 occurs not because these organisms are unable to calcify, but rather because their unprotected skeleton is dissolving faster.
Remember, the reason these tests have such high cancer - detection
rates is because they screen women for any small thing — like
calcification on a mammogram — that could potentially indicate cancer.
We show that different model assumptions regarding dissolution and
calcification rates have little impact
on future projections.
Moreover, using the average emission scenario (IS92a) of the Intergovernmental Panel
on Climate Change, we predict that the
calcification rate of scleractinian - dominated communities may decrease by 21 % between the pre-industrial period (year 1880) and the time at which pCO2 will double (year 2065).
In addition, they state that there was «no significant correlation between
calcification rate and seawater aragonite saturation (Ωarag)» and «no evidence of CO2 impact
on bleaching.»
A growing number of studies have demonstrated adverse impacts
on marine organisms, including decreases in
rates of coral
calcification, reduced ability of algae and zooplankton to maintain protective shells, and reduced survival of larval marine shellfish and fish [13], [14], [15].
Coastal ecosystems may show acidification or basification, depending
on the balance between the invasion of coastal waters by anthropogenic CO2, watershed export of alkalinity, organic matter and CO2, and changes in the balance between primary production, respiration and
calcification rates in response to changes in nutrient inputs and losses of ecosystem components.