Before moving to Seattle, Ben consulted for the Ministry of Commerce in Cambodia, studied economic development in Brazil, worked
on carbon market policy for The Nature Conservancy in San Francisco and attended college in Walla Walla, Washington, where he received an honors degree in Politics - Environmental Studies from Whitman College.
Not exact matches
The white paper
on Electricity
Market Reform has mapped out a new
policy to encourage the billions of investment that we need in all three families of low
carbon electricity generation — renewables, nuclear and clean coal and gas.
Robert Stavins, an economist at Harvard University who has written extensively
on carbon markets, noted that during the creation of the 1997 Kyoto Protocol, the United States insisted, over European objections,
on inserting
market mechanisms into global climate
policy.
But in a world which does not place a cost
on environmental degradation, but sees the environment as a free resource, it is not surprising that a
market - led energy
policy lets industry dump sulphur dioxide,
carbon dioxide and other pollutants indiscriminately into the atmosphere unless prevented by legal regulation.
These barriers must be overcome to support
policies and
markets that depend
on timely knowledge of where
carbon is stored
on land.
Third, governments must accept that real leverage
on emissions will require a combination of
market - based climate
policies (such as
carbon taxes and smarter trading schemes) and a set of measures to support indirect, but effective and economical pressure to cut
carbon and adopt new technologies.
> Reply - To: «Alistair R G Paton» > From: «Alistair R G Paton» > To: > Cc: «Gary R Stewart», > REDACTEDMartin G Green», > REDACTEDMax Kaplan», > REDACTEDGary Wilson», > REDACTEDPublic Relations Division», > REDACTEDRisk Management Division», > REDACTEDLegal Services Division», > REDACTEDFinancial Services Division», > REDACTEDEvaluations Division», > REDACTEDAuditing and Verification Division» > Subject: The
Carbon Trader — 12th Edition — «GORE»S US$ 79Billion GREEN
POLICY» > Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2000 16:58:26 +1000 > Organization: thecarbontrader.com > X-MSMail-Priority: Normal > X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE VREDACTED0 > > REDACTEDREDACTEDREDACTEDREDACTEDREDACTEDREDACTED > REDACTEDREDACTEDth Edition of The
Carbon Trader — weekly «the > worlds leading reporter, library and commercial services intermediary > within the emerging
carbon trading
market» was published this morning 3 > JulyREDACTEDth Edition free of charge via: www.thecarbontrader.com > edition we report
on: Al Gore's US$ 79b Green
Policy, World Bank's Green > loans to Poland ($ 93m) and India ($ 130m), Concerns over Chinese Aluminium >
markets, Nuclear Power to be phased out by 2020, Norway's Energy Minister > announces green agency, Senator Robert Hill press releases and many more > must read articles.
Second, Jon Huntsman is elected President in 2012 and pushes through the following
policies: The U.S. signs new trade agreements with developing countries where (1) Bans
on exporting U.S. natural gas is lifted to developing economies; (2) Developing countries are given «favored» status into U.S.
Markets; (3) In exchange for these 2 benefits, Developing Countries agree to develop their economies to «low
carbon standards» by purchasing U.S. high energy efficiency technology products.
Steven leads the UN regulatory and
policy stream and advises CCC's funds
on policy and regulatory developments of the international
carbon market and broader international climate
policy developments.
He has done research and consultancy
on urban energy modeling, urban greenhouse gas (GHG) inventory, integrated land - use and transport
policies, real estate and housing
markets, Urban green growth,
carbon finance and cities, city networks and post-2012 negotiation process.
He previously researched
carbon markets at MIT's Center for Energy and Environmental
Policy Research and consulted for the World Bank's Independent Evaluation Group
on CO2 emissions.
Instead, it urges us to concentrate
on existing
policies and tools by showing how the development of
carbon markets could dramatically reduce world greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, triggering
policies to build a new low -
carbon energy system while restructuring the way agriculture interacts with forests.
Ultimately, the U.S. needs a long - term clean energy
policy that create a long - term
market for renewable energy, encourages and supports the integration of renewable energy, puts a price
on carbon emissions, and increases funding for research and development.
We need new
policies, regulatory frameworks, and institutions focused
on four areas: creating
market - based incentives to innovate and raise
carbon productivity; addressing
market failures that prevent abatement opportunities from being captured profitably; resolving issues of allocation and fairness, in particular between the developed and developing worlds and between industry sectors; and accelerating progress to avoid missing critical emissions targets.
Wherever they are, companies and
markets would benefit from a clear direction
on national and international
carbon regulation
policy.
«A properly designed revenue - neutral price
on carbon will improve economic efficiency, promote better environmental outcomes than existing
policy and allow
market forces to determine the course to a lower -
carbon future.»
For instance, a
market - based
policy like a price
on carbon might encourage consumers to buy more fuel - efficient cars, but it will fall well short of revolutionizing global energy infrastructure and technologies.
However, the effectiveness of a given
carbon pricing
policy will depend
on the strength of the price signal, the breadth of the economy it covers, and how well any spending programs or other complementary features solve additional
market failures that a price alone does not address.
Studies of the global
carbon cycle often identify biomass energy as being among the most important potential benefits associated with the forest industry value chain...» They then go
on to worry that the use of paper fiber (biomass) for fuel would cause ``... -
market - distorting public
policies that disproportionately favor the use of these materials for their fuel value, - public
policies that fail to recognize the direct and indirect economic and social benefits associated with using biomass as a feed stock for forest products manufacturing,...».
But Ecosystem Marketplace's latest report
on the voluntary and compliance
markets shows forest
carbon projects already having an impact an impact that could multiply if the right
policy signals are sent.
In the first 20 years of
carbon policy, as noted above, policymakers» almost exclusive focus
on «
market - based»
policy rather than the combined political - economy as a whole including direct public investment and utilizing the
policy space available to monetarily sovereign government in the area of fiscal
policy more generally.
When the
policy solution emphasized a tax
on carbon emissions or some other form of government regulation, which is generally opposed by Republican ideology, only 22 percent of Republicans said they believed the temperatures would rise at least as much as indicated by the scientific statement they read.But when the proposed
policy solution emphasized the free
market, such as with innovative green technology, 55 percent of Republicans agreed with the scientific statement.For Democrats, the same experiment recorded no difference in their belief, regardless of the proposed solution to climate change.As study authors Troy Campbell and Aaron Kay wrote in the introduction to their paper about this study, this shows «not necessarily an aversion to the problem, per se, but an aversion to the solutions associated with the problem.»
By reporting potential emissions, a company would acknowledge its contribution to the
carbon budget and implicitly show that it is preparing to respond to
policies and
market signals for a low -
carbon future, such as a price
on carbon pollution.
By Elizabeth Harrington California will mandate solar panels
on new homes out of concern for climate change, a
policy that will raise prices in the most expensive home
market in the country and does little to decrease the state's
carbon footprint.
Fourth, although
carbon pricing is not sufficient
on its own (because of other
market failures that reduce the impact of price signals — more about this below), it is a necessary component of a sensible climate
policy, because of factors 1 through 3, above.
Meanwhile, Butler was quoted this morning as saying that moving more rapidly to a
market price for
carbon — which will effectively bring the Australian price down to European prices, where efforts to strengthen climate
policy and the
carbon price have been thwarted by coal - reliant Poland, would have an impact
on the budget but would also be complex.
«For the moment green energy is not viable
on its own without subsidy or regulatory incentives...
market forces will not provide sufficient financing unless the risks of
policy change are appropriately addressed,» the PM told energy ministers from 22 countries, who contribute 80 % of global
carbon emissions.
On the compliance side, California's cap - and - trade program stands to add another 40 MtCO2e in demand for REDD + offsets through 2020, if state regulators open the market up to offsets from carbon projects located outside the U.S.. However, long - term plans hinge largely on policy at the national level in Brazi
On the compliance side, California's cap - and - trade program stands to add another 40 MtCO2e in demand for REDD + offsets through 2020, if state regulators open the
market up to offsets from
carbon projects located outside the U.S.. However, long - term plans hinge largely
on policy at the national level in Brazi
on policy at the national level in Brazil.
To help meet that goal, California is implementing numerous measures, including standards for renewable energy, a
policy to scale up the use of clean fuels, requirements and incentives to increase the use of electric vehicles, and a flexible
market - based cap
on carbon emissions that creates economic incentives for major
carbon polluters to cut their emissions.
The group recommended that the government should resolve the uncertainties over its plans for electricity
market reform as soon as possible, as well as setting out a clear
policy on the
carbon price floor — which ensures companies and generators pay a minimum price for their emissions - and work with industry to «foster a constructive dialogue with the public
on energy
policy».
President Trump's attacks
on the Clean Power Plan — an essential
policy to ensure we achieve
carbon pollution reductions and provide a long - term investment signal for
markets — and other essential safeguards are an assault
on the continuing bipartisan legacy of environmental protection in America.
«As organizations that support free
markets as a fundamental pathway to American prosperity, we oppose government
policies — such as a
carbon tax — that punish some and reward others in accordance with the government's prevailing viewpoint
on market ideals.
Michelle Chan, senior
policy analyst with Friends of the Earth, warns about the potential downside risk in creating new derivative
markets based
on carbon.
If you don't put a value
on carbon,
market forces will overwhelm the no - regret and technology
policies Goklany proposes by redirecting them to business - as - usual purposes.
It describes its goal as to «raise awareness of the costs and implications of
policies based
on global warming alarmism by conducting a multi-faceted campaign to peel away grassroots political support for
carbon restrictions, while simultaneously promoting
market - based
policies that preserve individual liberty, economic opportunity, and environmental quality.»