At this RFF seminar, experts provided the latest updates
on carbon pricing developments in the three nations:
Not exact matches
By calling for re-energizing CCS
development, PCAST is making two judgments: 1) that the coal industry is highly likely to remain competitive even as it complies with EPA restrictions
on emissions of SOx, NOx, Hg, and other toxics; and 2) that a substantial
price on carbon is highly likely to arrive in a time frame of relevance for a CCS
development effort.
Thomas has also worked extensively in the analysis of
carbon market mechanisms and
carbon pricing instruments, with a focus
on the Clean
Development Mechanism (CDM) and Article 6 of the Paris Agreement.
Ambitious mitigation will require a range of actions, including investing in research,
development, and technology transfer; phasing out subsidies
on fossil energy; and
pricing carbon.
We assert that a
price on carbon, in conjunction with increased support for research,
development, and demonstration of innovative clean energy technologies, can best coordinate innovation with deployment.
How one sees the answer boils down to an important difference in perspective
on how to best deal with climate change: Do we (a) try to influence the course of future human
development using
carbon pricing as the main policy tool?
Equally important, the group urges that government catalyze the
development of energy alternatives by sending «a strong market signal» through such mechanisms as mandates
on utilities to produce more renewable energy or «a
price or a cap»
on carbon emissions1.
A
price on carbon emissions will reduce greenhouse gas emissions in Washington State and spur the
development of new, renewable energy alternatives, and represents an important first step toward making meaningful progress toward
carbon reduction in Washington State and protecting both birds and people in a warming world.»
Ultimately, the U.S. needs a long - term clean energy policy that create a long - term market for renewable energy, encourages and supports the integration of renewable energy, puts a
price on carbon emissions, and increases funding for research and
development.
The World Bank and the We Mean Business Coalition will form a group
on carbon pricing to continue
development of the principle after tomorrow's summit.
In this role he leads research work
on carbon pricing, peer review of national and sub-national GHG estimates, technical content
development, climate finance, trainings & capacity building, and technical review.
Gerard Ostheimer, a scientist attached to Sustainable Energy For All of the United Nations said, higher
price per ton of
carbon could push
development of biofuels
on a large scale.
In addition the report says countries must adopt policies that put a
price on carbon emissions and provide incentives to spur the
development of energy - efficient technologies.
-- Supports a
price on carbon AND methane — Supports high labor standards in the
development of renewable energy — Supports changing the Clean Power Plan to incentivize renewable energy over fracked gas.
This Pollyanna view of fossil fuel alternatives and efficiency, which makes going green seem cheap and easy — little more than the cost of «a postage stamp a day» — has provided the justification for green - policy advocacy that has overwhelmingly focused
on pollution regulations and
carbon pricing while ignoring serious investment in energy research and
development.
To speed up the
development and dissemination of solar energy we need more R&D funding, market incentives such as feed - in tariffs, and a steadily increasing
price on carbon emissions now.
Accelerating research and
development of renewable energy and energy efficiency, phasing out fossil - fuel subsidies and progressively putting an explicit
price on carbon pollution were all key objectives agreed upon at the conference.
Voluntary demand for forest
carbon offsets increased, too, and several
developments — including the flurry of green supply chain commitments by major commodity producers and the fact that more than 400 major companies now have an internal
price on carbon — indicate that the world of private sector actors potentially interested in forest
carbon interventions is quickly expanding.
This analytical report argues that the structure of the Clean
Development Mechanism (CDM) has reduced the effectiveness of the resources spent
on carbon reduction and attempts to measure the cost of the ineffectiveness analysing the projects registered under the CDM by measuring their cost of abatement against the
price paid for doing the abatement.
Moreover, I would suggest that those of us in «the electorate» who are well - informed about this issue are well aware that changes in public policy — including putting a
price on carbon pollution, directly regulating GHG emissions, and providing effective support for the
development and deployment of efficiency and renewable energy technologies
on a scale at least comparable to the subsidies that fossil fuels have received for a century — are far more effective than the options that any individual can currently choose, and are in fact crucial to making more such options available to all of us.
Diogenes, you missed Hansen's # 1 part of his plan which is the CCL
carbon fee /
price, and # 2 part of his plan which is getting China and the USA in bed together
on the
carbon price to «lead the world» and fast paced nuclear
development together.
My hope is that victories like this one will help build the momentum to generate the kind of people power necessary to move the needle
on comprehensive climate policy — policy that
prices carbon, removes subsidies for oil companies, and encourages clean energy
development.
The study, based
on overlaying maps of proposed oil palm
development with maps showing
carbon - density and wildlife distribution in Kalimantan (Indonesian Borneo), estimates that REDD is financially competitive, and potentially able to fund forest conservation, with oil palm at
carbon prices of $ 10 - $ 33 per ton of
carbon dioxide equivalent (tCO2e).
«Fossil fuel subsidies work against Canada's commendable progress in putting a
price on carbon — they give money and tax breaks to the sources of
carbon pollution that we're trying to scale back,» Amin Asadollahi, North American Lead
on Climate Change Mitigation at the International Institute for Sustainable
Development, said.