Sentences with phrase «on cash return here»

It's virtually impossible to get anything to cash flow with a decent cash on cash return here in CA.

Not exact matches

Here's some more color on returning cash to shareholders from Butters» note: «Share repurchase programs have become a very popular way of returning capital to shareholders over the years.

Here in Texas it's very easy to find 20 % + cash - on - cash return properties.

The main investment thesis here is you have a company that produces high returns on capital with a long history of stable free cash flow that trades at around 8 times FCF.

They write, «MSFT's closing price on 7/12/10: $ 24.83, so assuming $ 2.40 / share of FY 2011 earnings (midpoint of analysts» estimates and our own), plus $ 4 share in cash, here are possible stock prices and returns (plus there's a 2.1 % dividend): 10x multiple = $ 28 stock = 13 % return.

Investors who keep cash in these funds for long periods of time risk missing out on more profitable rates of return elsewhere, and the rates of interest that they earn here will seldom outpace inflation.

In other words don't count on that cash being returned to shareholders or even invested in passive investments (private or public equity) for the benefit of shareholders; A liquidation valuation really isn't of interest here as Glassbridge is set to be an ongoing business and I can see an operating cash bleed for 3 - 5 years depending on how long it takes the company to attract enough AUM to cover operating (read staffing) costs.

Of course, the usual temptation here is to rely primarily on quantitative analysis — let the numbers do the talking — focusing on the consistency & sustainability of strong free cash flow (as a % of net income), high net margins, high return on equity (though not dependent on excessive debt), and good return on assets (in excess of WACC).

Just would like to sum up with this question to your fellow editor about a curious number (pardon the pun): Under the «NO foreign transaction fee» Marriott Rewards Premier Visa section recommending it, it reads «Out of the three cards, this is the only one that's seriously worth considering for everyday use» despite it being «one of only two» cards listed side by side that have «annual fees» after the first year (with Barb's choice the second one that loves charging 2.5 % «foreign transaction fees» upfront / from the start on all foreign transactions rebating «afterwards» as «reward points» statement all of them «except on returns and cash advances» where the fees remain); however this article shows «more than three cards» (though granted the Amazon.ca Visa is unavailable now for the new applicant plus the missing Mogo Visa is a prepaid one and whereas this year's (2017) new $ 149 annual fee HSBC Premier World Elite MC is exclusively for their premier clients only) so which «three cards» in that statement there would we talking about here?

Just would like to sum up with this question to your fellow editor about a curious number (pardon the pun): Under the «NO foreign transaction fee» Marriott Rewards Premier Visa section recommending it, it reads «Out of the three cards, this is the only one that's seriously worth considering for everyday use» despite it being «one of only two» cards listed side by side that have «annual fees» after the first year (with Barb's choice the second one that loves charging 2.5 % «foreign transaction fees» upfront / from the start on all foreign transactions rebating «afterwards» as «reward points» statement all of them «except on returns and cash advances» where the fees remain); however this article shows «more than three cards» (though granted the Amazon.ca Visa is unavailable now for the new applicant plus the missing Mogo Visa is a prepaid one and whereas this year's (2017) new $ 149 annual fee HSBC Premier World Elite MC is exclusively for their premier clients only) so which «three cards» in that statement there would we talking about here?

Here, the return that is attained on the cash value is set by the insurance company.

Here, however, the cash value of the policy will have its return based on the performance of an underlying market index, such as the S&P 500.

Here, there is death benefit protection and monetary value — and the return on the cash value is related to the performance of an underlying market index.

So for the cash - on - cash return, you want to use your annual net income, but unlike the cap rate you do want to include financing costs here.

Here's another example: Let's say you have a property with a cash - on - cash return of 8 %.

Here we take a closer look at Cash on Cash Return.

Buy and hold can work to start but I think I'd rather have more passive cash then wait years for rent to match or a return on equity here.

Same here @Christopher Collins I would use cash on cash return as well as dollar income per unit to evaluate whether to pursue a deal or not.