Other determinants, including local labor market conditions, parental education and family structure appear to have a greater impact
on child poverty levels, according to Myungkook Joo, assistant professor in Rutgers School of Social Work, who authored the study.
Not exact matches
There is a paradox at the heart of much of the new research
on early adversity and
child development: While the problems that accompany
poverty may be best understood
on the molecular
level, the solutions are not.
However, noting that even their increased earnings barely took the participants» income above
poverty level, the evaluators recommend that an early focus
on education and training rather than
on income - generation may be a more productive long - term strategy for these young men and their
children (Spaulding et al, 2009).
With financial help from the state concentrated
on pensioners and the young, one in seven working - age adults without dependent
children are now living in
poverty — the highest ever
level.
The analogy to the climate change legislation could be to make a statutory commitment to reduce
child poverty (for example, to reach by 2020 a
level of
child poverty at least 90 % below the 1999 when the commitment to reduce and end
child poverty was made) and then to set up an equivalent group to the Low Pay Commission or Monetary Policy Committee to report before each pre-budget report and budget as to progress towards this, and to assess and advise
on the range of policy options necessary to get
on track.
published in September's Social Service Review, and yields many important findings, among them that the overall effect that
children in immigrant families have
on the national
poverty level was minor and runs counter to what some scholars have argued.
Certainly any strategy that seeks to improve life chances and equalise opportunities for
children without turning the tide against growing
levels of
child poverty is going to face an uphill struggle and place an even greater burden
on services that seek to alleviate various negative effects of inadequate family resources.
«It wasn't true that I had never encountered
poverty before, but having an understanding that this was what
children in the U.S. were dealing with and the
level of need going
on, and the demands placed
on teachers was overwhelming.»
The federal allocations to the district
level based
on child poverty and population rely
on Census / ACS data that are not available at the school
level.
Kevin Courtney, joint general secretary of the NEU said: «The
level of
child poverty teachers and school staff are witnessing
on a daily basis is having a dreadful effect
on the life chances and education of far too many
children and young people.
«The
level of
child poverty teachers and school staff are witnessing
on a daily basis is having a dreadful effect
on the life chances and education of far too many
children and young people.
But teachers can not undo the damage inflicted
on youngsters by a society in which nearly half of all births are to unwed mothers and in which more than 20 % of
children live below the
poverty level (income below $ 23,000 for a family of 4).
The report evaluated the 50 U.S. states
on four fairness measures: per - pupil funding
levels; funding distribution (whether a state provides more or less funding to schools
on the basis of their
poverty concentration); effort (differences in state spending relative to the state's fiscal capacity); and coverage (the proportion of
children in public schools and the income ratio of private and public school families).
School district funding is divided into three categories: Basic grants given for all students, with different
levels based
on grade span; supplemental grants for students in
poverty, English learners and foster
children, called high - needs students; concentration grants for school districts with more than 55 percent of high - needs students.
The authors pointed out some of the advantages of low
poverty noting, «
Children whose parents read to them at home, whose health is good and can attend school regularly, who do not live in fear of crime and violence, who enjoy stable housing and continuous school attendance, whose parents» regular employment creates security, who are exposed to museums, libraries, music and art lessons, who travel outside their immediate neighborhoods, and who are surrounded by adults who model high educational achievement and attainment will, on average, achieve at higher levels than children without these educationally relevant advantages
Children whose parents read to them at home, whose health is good and can attend school regularly, who do not live in fear of crime and violence, who enjoy stable housing and continuous school attendance, whose parents» regular employment creates security, who are exposed to museums, libraries, music and art lessons, who travel outside their immediate neighborhoods, and who are surrounded by adults who model high educational achievement and attainment will,
on average, achieve at higher
levels than
children without these educationally relevant advantages
children without these educationally relevant advantages.»
Student - based budgeting provides a base amount for each
child, boosted for factors such as
poverty levels, academic achievement, whether they are learning English, and certain disabilities,
on a scale set by the school board.
ESEA, Title I, Improving the Academic Achievement of the Disadvantaged $ 14.4 Billion Funding based
on the population of
children living below the federal
poverty level (FPL) and the state expenditure per pupil.
In Hartford, 47.9 percent of the
children now grow up in households trying to make it
on an income that places them below the federal
poverty level.
Attorney James Hall, president of the Milwaukee chapter of the NAACP, rattled off a host of statistics about Milwaukee's low ranking
on a number of quality - of - life metrics, from the recent finding by the Annie E. Casey Foundation that Wisconsin is the worst state in the nation for African American
children, to our sky - high
levels of mass incarceration of black men, our nation - leading racial gap in student achievement, our high
poverty rate and geographic segregation.
«Teachers realize that while their own impact
on children is great, it is not as great as the influence of many other factors, including but not limited to
poverty, language proficiency, home life, learning disabilities,
level of parental involvement and education, and access to proper facilities and technologies,» said West Hartford teacher Ted Goerner.
This then established the relationship between neighbourhood socioeconomic status (SES) and a number of
children's health and developmental outcomes.9 Longitudinal research suggested structural characteristics such as
poverty and demography were mediated through community -
level social processes that influenced the functioning of families and
children.10, 11 Today, however, there is still limited understanding of the modifiable community -
level factors likely to benefit outcomes for young
children despite socioecological frameworks suggesting there are multiple
levels of influence (individual, family, community)
on early
child development (ECD).12, 13 Investigating these influences is thought best undertaken through a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods that can test these multiple influences
on ECD.14, 15
/ Patient satisfaction / Partners in assessment / Partnership with parents / Patterns / Peacebuilding / Peer group treatment / Peer pressure (1) / Peer pressure (2) / Peer subcultures / Peers / Perceptions / Permanency planning / Permanency planning and residential care / Permission / «Persona» of the residential center / Personal integrity / Personal qualities / Personal resources / Personnel / Perspectives
on restraint / Pessimistic approaches / Philosophy / Philosophy in careworker training / Philosophy of care / Philosophy
on behaviour / Physical environment (1) / Physical environment (2) / Physical restraint / Pinocchio / Place of the group / Placed adolescents and their parents / Placement / Placement of acting - out
children / Planned ignoring / Planning / Play (1) / Play (2) / Play, work and growth / Pleasures / Points and
levels / Points and
levels dilemma / Positive context for residential placements / Positive discipline / Positive peer culture (1) / Positive peer culture (2) / Positive peer culture (3) / Positive peer culture in corrections / Positive peer culture problem - solving list / Positive peer groups /
Poverty, guilt, and hopelessness / Power / Power and control / Power of peers / Power struggles / Powerful environment / Powerful life events / Powerlessness of punishment / Practice (1) / Practice (2) / Practice skills training / Practice theory / Practice vs. organisation?
The average pay for
child care teachers is barely more than $ 10 per hour, lower than for most other jobs, including parking lot attendants and dog walkers.26 These low wages contribute to economic insecurity among the
child care and early education workforce, with one in seven living in families with incomes below the federal
poverty level.27 Currently, about half of people working in the
child care sector rely
on public benefit programs such as Medicaid and nutrition assistance.28 Low pay contributes to high turnover rates, which can threaten quality in early childhood programs during
children's critical developmental period.
A report released by the D.C. auditor this summer estimates there are 6,300 households with
children under 5 that would benefit from home - visiting programs, based
on risk - factor data including
poverty levels, access to prenatal care and developmental delays.
The program is targeted to preschoolers with a maximum family income of 250 % of the federal
poverty level ($ 60,750 for a family of four), and
children are prioritized for enrollment based
on income and other risk factors, such as a diagnosed disability, primary home language other than English, or parent (s) with low educational attainment.
A maximum of 10 % of enrolled GSRP
children may be from families with incomes above 250 % of the federal
poverty level who pay tuition
on a sliding scale, based
on family income.
For example, compared to older mothers, teen mothers display lower
levels of verbal stimulation and involvement, higher
levels of intrusiveness, and maternal speech that is less varied and complex.47, 48 Mothers with fewer years of education read to their
children less frequently25, 49 and demonstrate less sophisticated language and literacy skills themselves, 50 which affects the quantity and quality of their verbal interactions with their
children.2 Parental education, in turn, relates to household income:
poverty and persistent
poverty are strongly associated with less stimulating home environments, 51 and parents living in
poverty have
children who are at risk for cognitive, academic, and social - emotional difficulties.52, 53 Finally, Hispanic and African American mothers are,
on average, less likely to read to their
children than White, non-Hispanic mothers; 54 and Spanish - speaking Hispanic families have fewer
children's books available in the home as compared to their non-Hispanic counterparts.25 These racial and ethnic findings are likely explained by differences in family resources across groups, as minority status is often associated with various social - demographic risks.
While there is much literature
on individual
level variables that affect prenatal care adherence such as age,
poverty, low self - esteem, and transportation, there is little practice based research knowledge
on diminishing potential birth risks by repairing and building the maternal — infant (fetus) relationship prior to the actual birth of the
child.