We have compiled a list of the 50 most followed scientists on the social media platform and their academic citation counts — and calculated their K - index by drawing
on citation data from Google Scholar (A fuller explanation of how we compiled the list is below, at the end of the full story).
Not exact matches
That's one of the key criteria in Reuters» ranking, which was compiled in partnership with Clarivate Analytics, and is based
on proprietary
data and analysis of patent filings and research paper
citations.
One issue not addressed — and of considerable interest — is rules about authorship,
citations, and so
on: If I post my
data, can other scientists use it in their own scientific articles?
The Kardashian Index is calculated as follows: In his commentary, using
data gathered
on 40 scientists, Hall derived a formula for calculating the number of Twitter followers a scientist should have given one's
citation count.
Incentives — There is widespread agreement
on the need for carrots rather more than sticks, and
data citation is often seen as a potential key incentive for researchers.
Data collated from ISI Web of Knowledge (Science
Citation Expanded)
on 17 January 2006.
Small Market, Beat Reporting Special
Citation — Colleen Gillard, Lucy Hood, Patti Hartigan, Laura Pappano, Brigid Schulte, David McKay Wilson, The Harvard Education Letter, Harvard Education Letter's Education Coverage «Stopping Sexual Harassment in Middle School» by Colleen Gillard «The Greening of Environmental Ed» by Lucy Hood «Bringing Art into School, Byte by Byte» by Patti Hartigan «Integrated
Data Systems Link Schools and Communities» by Patti Hartigan «Differentiated Instruction Reexamined» by Laura Pappano «Using Research to Predict Great Teachers» by Laura Pappano «Hybrid Schools for the iGeneration» by Brigid Schulte ««Clicks» Get Bricks» by Brigid Schulte «Leading a System Where Everyone Gains» by David McKay Wilson «With Cheating
on the Rise Schools Respond» by David McKay Wilson
So, when we talk about editing, it is not only the grammar check but it is also a check
on content flow, factual
data check, check
on tone and cultural sensitivity, documentation and
citation check, style check according to your institutional standards, overall flow, and readability.
The Packaged Facts ®'s team of pet industry experts tracks
data, trends and new product developments for a wide range of published pet industry reports, including studies
on pet food, services and supplies markets.Most pet - related reports prepared by Packaged Facts ® feature
citations from APPA's National Pet Owners Survey.
I asked
on a previous thread whether anyone knew of a specific database suite that gave all of that functionality (versioning of binary
data, URL citeability of specific versions, forward
citation to see who used what etc.), but other than vague references, there wasn't anything concrete.
You may also kick off a «
citation fight», with people claiming certain articles are not in good enough journals, or some of the
data or predictions in the published papers turned out to be suspect, or the paper was not reviewed properly, or there are plenty of papers you have not cited which put the cooling argument, and so
on and so
on.
-LRB-...) we use an extensive dataset of 1,372 climate researchers and their publication and
citation data to show that (i) 97 — 98 % of the climate researchers most actively publishing in the field support the tenets of ACC outlined by the Intergovernmental Panel
on Climate Change, and (ii) the relative climate expertise and scientific prominence of the researchers unconvinced of ACC are substantially below that of the convinced researchers.
Can you provide details
on these series — preferably in the form of exact digital
citations (e.g. according to AGU
data citation policies).
If you think satellite and ground temperature trends agree, bring
on the
data, show the evidence, reference the study, give the
citation.
Craig Loehle claims [wrongly, and without
citations] «Only those [studies] based
on models [or
on paleo
data] get the high IPCC sensitivity.»
You've declared that «The truth will out, etc.» and the burden is
on you to provide the
data, proof,
citations, and cogent arguments to make the case for your proposition — not mine to make for you.
Suggested
citation for
data as displayed
on GFW: «Managed forests.»
The MWP (Medieval Warm Period) chart is generally correct (but it may not be based
on plot
data (no
citation, so hard to verify).
Again no
citation on his
data unfortunately.
Suggested
citation for
data as displayed
on GFW: «Plantations.»
Here, we use an extensive dataset of 1,372 climate researchers and their publication and
citation data to show that (i) 97 — 98 % of the climate researchers most actively publishing in the field surveyed here support the tenets of ACC outlined by the Intergovernmental Panel
on Climate Change, and (ii) the relative climate expertise and scientific prominence of the researchers unconvinced of ACC are substantially below that of the convinced researchers.
Here, we use an extensive dataset of 1,372 climate researchers and their publication and
citation data to show that (i) 97 — 98 % of the climate researchers most actively publishing in the field support the tenets of ACC outlined by the Intergovernmental Panel
on Climate Change, and (ii) the relative climate expertise and scientific prominence of the researchers unconvinced of ACC are substantially below that of the convinced researchers.
Some authors were spot
on with all their
citations, but I recall one who got 12 out of 13 references wrong (I rejected the paper — who knows how many errors were made in collecting and collating the
data).
Suggested
citation for
data as displayed
on GFW: «SAD Alerts.»
Suggested
citation for
data as displayed
on GFW: Reymondin, Louis, Andrew Jarvis, Andres Perez - Uribe, Jerry Touval, Karolina Argote, Julien Rebetez, Edward Guevara, and Mark Mulligan.
Suggested
citation for
data as displayed
on GFW: «Logging.»
Citation: Suggested citation for data as displayed on GFW: «NASA FIRMS
Citation: Suggested
citation for data as displayed on GFW: «NASA FIRMS
citation for
data as displayed
on GFW: «NASA FIRMS.»
Though I do hope you webcast the debate in some manner, I've often found a problem with these debates (at least if conducted honestly) is that they turn
on citations,
data, etc which really can't be checked in the limited amount of time available during the debate, so they turn into people flatly denying each other's facts.
Suggested
citation for
data as displayed
on GFW: «Mining.»
Suggested
citation for
data as displayed
on GFW: «NASA Active Fires.»
Suggested
citation for
data as displayed
on GFW: «Resource Rights.»
Suggested
citation for
data as displayed
on GFW: «Wood Fiber.»
Suggested
citations for
data as displayed
on GFW: Hansen, M. C., P. V. Potapov, R. Moore, M. Hancher, S. A. Turubanova, A. Tyukavina, D. Thau, S. V. Stehman, S. J. Goetz, T. R. Loveland, A. Kommareddy, A. Egorov, L. Chini, C. O. Justice, and J. R. G. Townshend.
Suggested
citation for
data as displayed
on GFW: «Land Rights.»
Suggested
citations for
data as displayed
on GFW: Greenpeace, University of Maryland, World Resources Institute and Transparent World.
Science is where you say «your claim 3 in paragraph 4 is wrong because it is based
on bad
data, the real
data is here» with a
citation.
It selects cases to include
on the site based
on rankings developed from
citation data in historical and constitutional texts.
Physical Address in City of Search
on Place Page Proper Category Associations
on Place Page Proximity of Address to Centroid
on Place Page Domain Authority of Website Quantity of Structured
Citations (IYPs,
Data Aggregators) City, State in Places Landing Page Title Quantity of Native Google Places Reviews Quality / Authority of Structured
Citations Local Area Code
on Place Page HTML NAP Matching Place Page NAP
He demonstrates, with case
citations, that American courts have largely failed to recognize the risk posed by admitting out of court «statements» made by computers, often by utilizing the business records exception in a manner treats computer - generated as far more reliable than they deserve to be treated given the commonplace challenges in processing
data: «Just because businesses rely
on faulty computer programs does not necessarily mean that courts should follow suit.»
# 4 Quality / Authority of Inbound Links to Domain # 5 Consistency of
Citations on the Primary
Data Sources # 6 Domain Authority of Website # 8 Quality / Authority of Structured
Citations # 9 Consistency of
Citations on Tier 1
Citation Sources # 11 Quality / Authority of Inbound Links to GMB Landing Page URL # 16 Diversity of Inbound Links to Domain # 17 Quantity of Inbound Links to Domain # 20 Quantity of Inbound Links to Domain from Locally Relevant Domains # 21 Quality / Authority of Unstructured
Citations (Newspaper Articles, Blog Posts, Gov Sites, Industry Associations) # 28 Quantity of Inbound Links to Domain from Industry - Relevant Domains # 29 Quantity of
Citations from Locally Relevant Domains # 33 Product / Service Keywords in Anchor Text of Inbound Links to Domain # 34 Quantity of Inbound Links to GMB Landing Page URL # 37 Prominence
on Key Industry - Relevant Domains # 38 Location Keywords in Anchor Text of Inbound Links to Domain # 39 Diversity of Inbound Links to GMB Landing Page URL # 40 Quantity of
Citations from Industry - Relevant Domains # 44 Enhancement / Completeness of
Citations # 47 Quantity of Structured
Citations (IYPs,
Data Aggregators) # 48 Quantity of Inbound Links to GMB Landing Page URL from Locally Relevant Domains
The
data set includes information
on, among others, date, member state, court of referral, legal domain or subject matter (e.g., competition, environmental protection, free movement of goods), and the official European Court Reports
citation.
I am actually working
on a book right now about
data analytics in law, probably scheduled to come out in 2017 - 2018, but I think there's going to be a lot of insights in
data analysis, like what we did with Bad Law Bot, where we said you can derive from the
citations and figure out which cases have been overturned algorithmically.
Virtually all case metadata — case
citation, date, docket,
on appeal from, judges, parties, cases cited, and so
on — can be captured directly from the Word file if the
data elements are marked with distinct MS - Word styles according to a per - defined template (see here for example — http://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/14302/index.do)
If the usage, distribution, editorial policies, and
citation data are available to all in a uniform format, then quality work will find its audience, and if needed, rankings of various flavours can be made
on a more secure basis.
Settling
on a standard method for legal
citation is one of the many daunting tasks that we will need to tackle as we move toward a linked
data model for legal resources.
The simple notion is that,
on the Reflex page, you upload a document (or a case name or single
citation) from your machine and Reflex, recognizing case names,
citations and legislation
data, will edit that document by supplying
citations (where necessary) and hyperlinks to the appropriate text.
In a guest post this week
on Justia's Verdict blog, I explain how one can use
citation format to determine a legal information service's
data source for case law and report
on the results of such an investigation.
Today's release of the USPTO Patent Prosecution Research
Data: Unlocking Office Action & Citation Traits marks the first time that comprehensive data on over 4.4 million office actions from the last several years has been made readily available to the pub
Data: Unlocking Office Action &
Citation Traits marks the first time that comprehensive
data on over 4.4 million office actions from the last several years has been made readily available to the pub
data on over 4.4 million office actions from the last several years has been made readily available to the public.
The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety's Highway Loss
Data Institute lists each state court decision and its
citation on their web site.
As reported by the latest
data, having only just one speeding
citation on your record will increase your car insurance policy costs by 20 %.