«Lack of disclosure
on climate risk remains an element of concern that will have to be addressed by the upcoming G - 20 Summit.»
Not exact matches
The Market
Climate remains on a Crash Warning, characterized by extremely unfavorable valuations, unfavorable trend uniformity, and hostile yield trends, particularly long - term bond yields and various measures of
risk premiums.
The Market
Climate remains on a Crash Warning, which as usual, is a warning of
risk, but not a forecast that a crash should be strongly expected.
Negotiations
on the future of
climate change, if they
remain dominated by targets for dates far into the future,
risk losing resonance with the individual.
On top of the risk of a deadly, engineered virus leaking into public spaces, there are also the environmental dangers of climate change, nuclear war, the potential of an enormous asteroid strike wiping us out, and the problem of humanity's overpopulation of the planet, just to name a few of the biggest challenges when it comes to remaining on Eart
On top of the
risk of a deadly, engineered virus leaking into public spaces, there are also the environmental dangers of
climate change, nuclear war, the potential of an enormous asteroid strike wiping us out, and the problem of humanity's overpopulation of the planet, just to name a few of the biggest challenges when it comes to
remaining on Eart
on Earth.
Though the APS statement about
climate change is more nuanced than the AAAS letter, stating — for example — «scientific challenges
remain in our abilities to observe, interpret, and project
climate change,» it in no way disputes the scientific consensus
on climate change or the
risks it poses.
The dollar value of our shorts never materially exceeds our long holdings, but the Strategic Growth Fund
remains fully hedged because the return /
risk profile of this particular
Climate hasn't been favorable
on average.
The best way forward, he said, is for the
climate convention and whatever addenda emerge in coming years
remain focused
on the core issue enshrined in 1992 — the need to avoid dangerous human - driven disruption of the
climate system and help nations most exposed to
risks.
A great moment, reflecting the inevitability of diverse responses to
climate risk on a variegated planet, came during a plenary panel focused
on ways to satisfy fast - growing human energy needs while moving away from burning fossil fuels, which
remain the world's dominant energy source.
But Obama faces a reality that many of these groups seem slow to recognize: While the 20th - century toolkit preferred by traditional environmentalists — litigation, regulation and legislation —
remains vital to limiting domestic pollution
risks such as the oil gusher, it is a bad fit for addressing the building human influence
on the
climate system, which is driven now mainly by a surge in emissions mostly outside United States borders in countries aiming to propel their climb out of poverty
on the same fossil fuels that generated much of our affluence.
Amid all the progress
on this planet — declining losses from terrible diseases and war, rising literacy and the rest — there
remain plenty of planet - scale
risks requiring serious focus, from pandemic flu to centuries of locked - in
climate change to, yes, collisions with space rocks.
So far, all of the criteria air pollutants under the agency's purview — substances from lead to sulfur dioxide — have a direct impact
on human health and welfare, while
risks from the carbon dioxide's buildup
remain indirect, through the rising influence
on climate.
Based
on this argument I think that the fraction of additional CO2 that
remains in atmosphere for very long time doesn't bring anything worthwhile to the discussion of
risks of
climate change, it's just another distraction that makes reasoned discussion only more difficult as long as our understanding of
climate change and it's consequences is not very much better than it's now.
Because it has been scientifically well established that there is a great
risk of catastrophic harm from human - induced change (even though it is acknowledged that there are
remaining uncertainties about timing and magnitude of
climate change impacts), no high - emitting nation, sub-national government, organization, business, or individual of greenhouse gases may use some
remaining scientific uncertainty about
climate change impacts as an excuse for not reducing its emissions to its fair share of safe global greenhouse gas emission
on the basis of scientific uncertainty.
Mr. Bush opposes mandatory restrictions
on smokestack and tailpipe gases, which many
climate scientists link to global warming, saying the science pointing to the
risks remains uncertain.
And yet, despite a long history of scientific warnings (please see Footnote 30 for a detailed description30), the many current ecological and economic impacts and crises, the future
risks and dangers, the large number of international meetings and conferences
on the urgent need for
climate policies and measures, and the adoption of some national and regional
climate policies, growth in global CO2 emissions from fossil fuels and cement has not only
remained strong but is actually accelerating.