The hunts have gone on for years in the name of scientific research, using a loophole in the 1986 moratorium
on commercial whaling under the International Whaling Commission.
Not exact matches
It appears that, for now at least, Watson is able to shift from his longstanding prime target — the Japanese fleet harpooning in Antarctic waters
under a program described as research but widely criticized as an end run around a moratorium
on commercial whaling.
But because the International
Whaling Commission has imposed a moratorium on commercial whaling since 1986, Japan has continued whaling under a self - allocated quota for «scientific whaling.
Whaling Commission has imposed a moratorium
on commercial whaling since 1986, Japan has continued whaling under a self - allocated quota for «scientific whaling.
whaling since 1986, Japan has continued
whaling under a self - allocated quota for «scientific whaling.
whaling under a self - allocated quota for «scientific
whaling.
whaling.»
Earlier this year at the annual meeting of the International
Whaling Commission in Panama, South Korea had announced plans to kill whales under the guise of science, by exploiting a loophole to the ban on commercial w
Whaling Commission in Panama, South Korea had announced plans to kill
whales under the guise of science, by exploiting a loophole to the ban
on commercial whalingwhaling.
The report also confirms that many of the products are from internationally protected great
whale species including fin, sei, minke, sperm and Bryde's
whale — all of whom are protected
under the moratorium
on commercial whaling established by the International Whaling Commission in 1986 and have the highest level of protection under the Convention on International Trade in Endangered S
whaling established by the International
Whaling Commission in 1986 and have the highest level of protection under the Convention on International Trade in Endangered S
Whaling Commission in 1986 and have the highest level of protection
under the Convention
on International Trade in Endangered Species.
Under an objection to the global moratorium
on commercial whaling and a reservation to the Convention
on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) ban
on international trade in minke
whales, Norway is able to legally hunt and trade minke
whales.
Iceland's increased
commercial whaling and recent trade in
whale products diminish the effectiveness of the IWC's conservation program because: (1) Iceland's
commercial harvest of
whales undermines the moratorium
on commercial whaling put in place by the IWC to protect plummeting
whale stocks; (2) the fin
whale harvest greatly exceeds catch levels that the IWC's scientific body advised would be sustainable if the moratorium were removed; and (3) Iceland's harvests are not likely to be brought
under IWC management and control at sustainable levels through multilateral efforts at the IWC.
Iceland's continued, and expanding,
commercial whaling (including
on endangered species)
under its reservation to the moratorium
on commercial whaling is conducted without IWC supervision and control of the
whaling operation.
Under an exemption to the international ban
on commercial whaling, Greenland can hunt
whales for local consumption.
But, unlike Japan who kills
whales under the pretext of «scientific research» (a loophole in the international moratorium
on whaling), Norway openly hunts for
commercial purposes despite the illegality of it.
They are the World the World Trade Organization's ruling upholding the EU law banning seal products, and the decision of the International Court of Justice that Japan's Antarctic
whale hunt is not exempt from the international moratorium
on commercial whaling because it does not qualify for the scientific research exemption
under international
whaling law.