Not exact matches
If a client seeks their lawyer's advice
on a matter that could be illegal or expose them to criminal liability, and the client uses the advice to commit a
crime or act of fraud, the attorney could be asked to testify against their client.
«I have an evolving view
on this and in the United States it's a political
crime if you change your views
on something,» Shapiro says.
Recent comments from Yahoo's CEO suggest U.S. technology companies can be charged with the high
crime of treason
if they meddle in the government's attempt to collect private data
on citizens.
«
If we substitute a tax
on marijuana cigarettes equal to the difference between the local production cost and the street price people currently pay — that is, transfer the revenue from the current producers and marketers (many of whom work with organized
crime) to the government, leaving all other marketing and transportation issues aside we would have revenue of (say) $ 7 per [unit].
If not for the ban
on consolidating data into a searchable system, the ATF could create a database that allows it to immediately check the sales history of any gun used in a
crime.
For example, income per capita actually rises as
crime rises
if the country spends more money to fight that rising
crime —
on a larger police force or improved intelligence technologies.
Second, seek legislation requiring that
if a federally insured financial institution is required to pay fines to or settlements with any regulatory agency aggregating more than $ 2.5 billion in any two year period based
on conduct that,
if established, would constitute a
crime under any law, then the CEO, President, and all Board members must step down, disgorge all of the bank's stock they own, and they are disqualified from holding any office at any federally - insured institution for the rest of their lives.
Although the Madoff Trustee has not revealed the information as to the precise dates
on which Picower withdrew funds from Madoff,
if we assume that the funds were drawn out evenly over 25 years, and we assume that Picower had simply invested his stolen money in U.S. Treasury Notes over a 25 - year period, he would have tripled his money — giving him a profit from Madoff's
crimes of approximately $ 21 billion.
«
If I authorize or direct my attorney to threaten what a later court determines to be illegal actions against a third - party, I can be held legally accountable for that potential crime; if my attorney makes statements on my behalf, I can be held accountable for them if I authorized them.&raqu
If I authorize or direct my attorney to threaten what a later court determines to be illegal actions against a third - party, I can be held legally accountable for that potential
crime;
if my attorney makes statements on my behalf, I can be held accountable for them if I authorized them.&raqu
if my attorney makes statements
on my behalf, I can be held accountable for them
if I authorized them.&raqu
if I authorized them.»
It would also be helpful
if the federal government would bring back tough
on crime laws implemented by the federal conservatives under the leadership of Stephen Harper.
If God existed and was here
on earth, he would be incarcerated for his
crimes against man's law.
I for one think
crime will go down
if the criminal code was displayed
on billboard with popular figures like «don't give wrong doses of drugs» with MJs doc.
If I ever met him, I'd probably tell him that he is horrible and disgusting and if he were on Earth, he'd be arrested and put on trial for his crimes against humanit
If I ever met him, I'd probably tell him that he is horrible and disgusting and
if he were on Earth, he'd be arrested and put on trial for his crimes against humanit
if he were
on Earth, he'd be arrested and put
on trial for his
crimes against humanity.
But I trust that our countrymen will not be softened to that kind of
crimes and criminals; for
if we should, our hearts will be hardened to everything which has a claim
on our benevolence.
If there was no God, who's causing the
crime on Earth?
If you read the Bible and look at the world, it becomes impossible to be silent
on anyone's
crime or to commit suicide.
If these people would bother to look at the evidence, which was that Zimmerman called 911 and stayed on the line... why would he of called if he was about to commit a crim
If these people would bother to look at the evidence, which was that Zimmerman called 911 and stayed
on the line... why would he of called
if he was about to commit a crim
if he was about to commit a
crime.
Second, I was saying
if Zimmerman had been black as well as Martin and it was considered black
on black
crime, Zimmerman would have been convicted with the evidence presented.
For better or worse, the elaborate investigation of, for instance, the connections between St. Paul's teaching
on justification and the criminal justice system will be totally inaccessible» and,
if accessible, implausible» to anyone within hailing distance of policy discussions about
crime and punishment.
For decades professors have laid their careers, and Israel its legislation,
on the line in witness to the truth that there is no statute of limitation for the Holocaust
crime, that
if Adolf Eichmann were in hiding still, and lived for the thousand years that the Third Reich was supposed to continue, a future court would still have to hunt him down and bring him to justice.
IF the torture law was seen to work, and there was a dramatic decrease in violent
crimes because bad people realized that they were okay with a death sentence, but 25 years of electric niple clamps was more than they were willing to take
on, then the government could make the case that they enacted the will of the people by reducing
crime.
So long as a husband lives, be he adulterer, be he sodomite, be he addicted to every kind of vice,
if she left him
on account of his
crimes, he is her husband still and she may not take another.»
If you believe you'd be committing
crimes without the few good parts from that book, then have at it because obviously you wouldn't be safe
on the streets.
He did not know whether any allowance was made for the age of the accused nor «whether pardon is given to those who repent» nor «whether punishment attaches to the mere name apart from secret
crimes, or to the secret
crimes connected with the name».3 In reply, Trajan wrote that Christians «are not to be sought out, but
if they are accused and convicted, they must be punished — yet
on this condition, that whoso denies himself to be a Christian, and makes the fact plain by his action, that is by worshipping our gods, shall obtain pardon
on his repentance, however suspicious his past conduct may be».4 The Emperor Hadrian (76 - 138; ruled 117 - 138) made clear that slanderous accusations against Christians were unacceptable and that it had to be proved that they had acted contrary to the laws.
If I were harrassed by these hypocritical, war - promoting anti-abortionista's, I'd merely sue them
on «relgious - hate -
crimes» grounds, as my pagan belief leaves ALL failed culture war issues up to me!
I am sure that
if anyone were charged with a
crime, or is
on trial, I am sure that
if any of those lines were used in the presence of a police officer, judge, jury, etc., that person would be ticking off that person and hurting his own case.
The chief of human rights at the U.N. said, «
If established as deliberate in a court of law, an airstrike
on a hospital may amount to a war
crime.»
In Canada, the provincial government of Ontario appointed a royal commission to study (among other things) «the increasing exhibition of violence in the communications industry; to determine
if there is any... relationship between this phenomenon and the incidence of violent
crime in society...» Two of the commission's research studies found that 24 per cent of the news items
on television and in newspapers dealt directly with violence and 40 per cent were violence - related, while radio news was concerned with violence and conflict almost 60 per cent of the time!
Even
if there were, no person's civil rights can be violated
on the ground that he will probably commit a
crime.
Christianity is immoral from the outset... we do not allow someone who did not commit a
crime to be punished as
if they did it because they want to take that persons just punishment... but christianity is based
on that very immorality.
I even once managed to get a death threat
on an atheist website along with one for Professor John Lennox who was told his legs should be broken and
if that failed he should be killed for
crimes against humanity.
Such
crime if it took place any where in our Islamic lands and was caught for the
crime... he will be torn to pieces there and then with out trial since trials are supposed for those who are suspected and not proven guilty... but as a case that is as plain they should have condemned him to worst death with out any need for court trials... But by being soft
on the issue and giving ear to such junk you open doors for those copycats whom seek fame... That is only fair and secure..
If it wasn't for the knowledge that was gathered and passed
on from Adam's times then generation after generation to revive, remind, warn the stray against the wish and will of those condemned ones who rejected, killed and exiled the Messengers and Prophets of God, then towards each
crime they have made they packed it in a different shiny papers just as of the sweet candies to explain why or for what they did it for!?
If any government
on Earth made a practice of detaining anyone who didn't follow the party line indefinitely, and torturing them constantly once detained, they would be branded as committing
crimes against humanity and international criminals.
If their position is not to be perceived as sentimental, if they hope to persuade any significant number of their overwhelming opposition, they must start by making clear that their case is not in principle argued on behalf of those who have been rightly convicted of capital crime
If their position is not to be perceived as sentimental,
if they hope to persuade any significant number of their overwhelming opposition, they must start by making clear that their case is not in principle argued on behalf of those who have been rightly convicted of capital crime
if they hope to persuade any significant number of their overwhelming opposition, they must start by making clear that their case is not in principle argued
on behalf of those who have been rightly convicted of capital
crimes.
«Congress has only faced votes a few times
on the complex legal and moral questions of whether heinous
crimes qualify as genocide — and division is deep about what,
if anything, the label mandates the U.S. government to do.»
I think, though, that the section
on abortion would be greatly strengthened
if teachers (and therefore students) were further reminded of the seriousness of the
crime of abortion in Catholic teaching and their obligation to resist it.
They don't know how to investigate
crime, so they fall back
on thuggery: «
If they can't find a suspect, they may just round up a group of people nearby and torture them until someone confesses.»
Teenage pregnancy is being cited as one of —
if not the leading cause — of delinquency and
crime, and it has been proven to have a direct bearing
on behavior problems in school and academic performance.
Things are seriously mixed up in our country
if Tebow is seen as someone who should be scorned, when so many other pro athletes abuse drugs, abuse their wives, abuse animals, and commit
crimes on a regular basis yet the public seems to be just fine with overlooking that behavior.
Any person
on this earth who commits a
crime needs to be held accountable, it does not matter
if your a police officer, fireman, news broadcaster, famous celebrity, priest, monk, factory worker, or cashier, you are a citizen of a country, each country has rules, each person is answerable to these rules.
«But
if this charge is true (that she wasn't a virgin
on her wedding night), and evidence of the girls virginity is not found, they shall bring the girl to the entrance of her fathers house and there her townsman shall stone her to death, because she committed a
crime against Israel by her unchasteness in her father's house.
I wonder,
if you accused them of a
crime based
on believe
if they would just go quietly or
if they would demand their day in court, with the facts and the evidence and so
on.
Christians are not necessarily «soft
on crime»
if they choose to advocate humane laws.
If you were to destroy a farmer's seed
on purpose, again, you have commited a
crime.
Also islam believes that
if you do not follow the prophet mohammed and his teachings that you are not a true follower of god and deserve punishment for such «
crimes» Meanwhile christians are just simply waiting for jesus to return and believe that when that happens god will pass his judgement
on the earth and we all will die and only those who are worthy of gods love will ascend to heaven and that those who do not believe in christ (who also happens to be gods only son in their eyes) will spend eternity in hell for their non-belief.
Even
if we can not know the answer to all of society's ills, even
if we can not pretend to know how to solve the problems of
crime and drugs and inflation and poverty, we can still proclaim that it is obviously and unquestionably a moral wrong to maintain a penal system based
on vengeance instead of rehabilitation; to allow human rights violations to go unchallenged (
on either side of the iron curtain); to waste vast quantities of food and resources while others are malnourished and sick and poor; or to allow so many children in our own midst to go through childhood unwanted and unloved and even abused.
We know that medicinally it benefits; we know that the reduction
on the prisoner population would be drastically cut; we know that a person
if more likely to commit a
crime when they are drunk opposed to stoned.
If the state is allowed to insert itself into the confessional in order to gain information
on child abuse, then how can the state be prevented from also demanding information from clergy
on other
crimes such as murder or conspiracy?
If you believe eternal punishment for finite «
crimes» is ok
on one hand and God is loving
on the other, then I think you may be confused.