This also has an extension sheet for higher ability with a focus on Descartes view
on dualism.
Accompanying the attack
on dualism has been the reclaiming of incarnational theology.
Some feel it reflects a negative valuation of human sexuality based
on the dualism of Hellenistic thought, which saw salvation as a freeing of the soul from the body, rather than the biblical tradition which affirms the goodness of the whole creation.
Not exact matches
He makes some surprising claims in the chapter
on human beings, arguing for a strong Cartesian
dualism of soul and body for humans, but claiming that dogs and cats have immaterial souls as well.
On the other hand, I was troubled by the
dualism involved in his revelational positivism.
to ihaftr, thats why we have to make a paradigm shift in our concept of Who is God from
dualism, meaning He is separate from us to Holism, one with Him, This is very significant this shift for it will have a profound effect
on the development of our concsience, Social responsibility and even altruism will be high virtue in this level of consciousness.
Only my realisation in that year that the whole human race was
on a collision course with disaster shook me out of this
dualism and forced me to rethink my theology in light of this most inclusive question of human destiny.
Perhaps the most important
dualism never foisted
on the Orthodox is that between academic theology and worship.
On the other hand, there are old and new forms of Manichaean
dualism that surrender the structures of this life to the devil, and deny that those structures come from the benevolent hand of God.
On the whole,
dualism was accepted by the general culture.
Kantian
dualism of the phenomena,
on the one side, and Geist,
on the other, superseded the Cartesian
dualism of matter and mind for most German intellectual work.
The philosophy you are referring to relies
on a concept called «
dualism», I don't believe in
dualism (as there's no proof for it).
Avoiding the extremes of both a materialistic monism and a mind - body
dualism, Ashbrook and Albright advocate an emergent holism that recognizes that the brain has a «bottom up» influence
on the mind, but also that the mind has a «top - down» influence
on the brain.
What he had to insist
on, against this wholly bodily account, was the psychic aspect.2 Whitehead,
on the other hand, in the wake of Cartesian
dualism, was faced with the necessity of bringing his readers» attention back to the bodily implications in perception.
Dualism, in all its forms, and
on every level.
By thus divorcing this relation from the clear ethical implications which both Buber and Ferdinand Ebner have given it, Heim makes possible a
dualism on the basis of which he characterizes man's relation with the eternal Thou as taking place in an altogether different dimension from his relation with his human Thou.
For some this has meant a more and more complete determinism and naturalism, for others a return to Gnostic ideas of
dualism or early Protestant emphases
on original sin.
Once we reject the
dualism of mind and nature we must place our experience of temporality
on a continuum with the rest of physical reality.
On the one hand he combats
dualism by presenting a view of human beings «shorn of its dependence of speaking of the soul», because he thinks that the soul brings in
dualism.
[4] Religious historian James Noel points out the problematics inherent in the contradictory worldviews upon which New Thought is based: philosophical non-
dualism on the one hand, and the
dualism of the Judeo - Christian biblical tradition
on the other.
The ambiguities in the struggles for bread and justice call him away from such simplistic
dualism to work
on what he calls «the left wing of the possible.»
The dominant society is built
on a paradigm of
dualism and polarity — us and them, good - guys and bad - guys, right and wrong, friend and foe, haves and have - nots.
To summarize, to literalize the apocalyptic passages in the New Testament, is to run counter to all we know of astronomy and the world of space; they are tied in with the then - current Jewish eschatology and Persian
dualism which saw evil in command of creation; as commonly accepted, they encourage passivity about the evils of the present world; they emphasize only one side of the message of Jesus to the exclusion of essential elements; they are grounded at least in part
on a misconstruction of biblical poetry and drama.
Another form of this
dualism is the commonly made claim that the evolutionary process continues
on the human level with cultural evolution, which is totally distinct from biological evolution.
The characteristic Western mind - set has accorded intrinsic value, and hence duties of justice, principally to the upper half of the
dualism and has considered it appropriate for those
on the lower half to be used for the benefit of those
on the upper.
• Scientific Studies that Show a Positive Effect of Religion
on Health • Mind - Body
Dualism — Is the Mind Purely a Function of the Brain?
Also the Jewish idea of God is to be marked off
on the negative side from any metaphysical
dualism.
This point is affirmed not only by panexperientialism's insistence
on the «ontological principle,» according to which only actualities can act (PR 19, 24, 43), but also by its rejection of both
dualism and supernaturalism.
It was early Christians» refusal of
dualism, their demand that God redeem the whole person, that forced
on them the question of bodily resurrection.
Preachers and theologians (especially Protestants) pride themselves
on avoiding body - soul
dualism, but pious talk at funerals is usually of the departed person surviving as a vague, benign spirit or as a thought in the memories of others.
The anthropocentrism with respect to value is based
on a metaphysical
dualism.
On the issue of Greek
dualism, there are hundreds of sources.
Why then, Bynum asks, did the early church — and not we who supposedly have discovered the significance of the body and renounced all
dualism — reflect so intently
on the resurrection of the body?
But, curiously enough, when I came to my first clear conviction
on the materialism -
dualism - idealism issue it was not of any particular philosopher or writer that I was thinking but of life and nature as I then experienced them while serving in a humble role in an army hospital.
Social liberal ideology is like Gnosticism in its reliance (which is usually implicit)
on one form or another of person - body (or self - body)
dualism; but
dualism is only one feature of Gnosticism (albeit a very important one).
The sharp
dualism between tile natural, the vital, the organic, and the spiritual,
on the one hand, and the artificial, the rational, the mechanistic, and the material,
on the other, needs to be challenged.
Searle's account of consciousness, in short, merely throws doubt
on the wisdom of his initial assumption — that there are only two alternatives for tackling the problem of consciousness: either search for a causal theory or succumb to some sort of vicious Cartesian
dualism.
As with the discussion
on epistemology, the two were separated by the ancient perspectives of monism and
dualism.
(Only national defense takes
on its special urgency in the spotlight of a cosmological
dualism that shines most brightly from the religious right, to whom Satan and his powers and principalities remain most actively evil.)
In fact, such texts, most of which date no earlier than the late second century, favor an extreme
dualism between spirit and body and offer little consolation for those hoping to celebrate the sexual passions that are so much
on Brown's mind.
As one raised
on Plato's
dualism and, earlier, the Bible Belt Protestant version of it, I had already come to suspect the validity of this notion before the experience of childbirth erased the last trace.
Without reverting to a mind - body
dualism, we could point to the Occasions
on which the body is not merely the passive instrument of the will.
Dualism is the pivotal mythic and philosophical construct
on which this inversion has turned.
Alice Rossi in her thoughtful article «A Biosocial Perspective
on Parenting» (Daedalus, Spring 1977) presents a brilliant challenge to the prevailing sociological
dualism that tends to discount physiological factors in social systems and relationships.
Inherited sexual
dualisms (spirit regarded as essentially different from and superior to body, and — the patriarchal counterpart — male regarded as essentially different from and superior to female) continue to have a formidable grip
on our personal lives, our communal ethos and our institutional structures.
We had opposed
on ontological grounds the
dualisms of mind and body, of humanity and nature, even of God and world.
Descartes,
on the other hand, seems to have established a clear dichotomy between the two, mirrored in the mind / body
dualism for which he is famous.
There was some emphasis
on a more organic way of thinking, and the
dualism of human beings and the natural world was not quite as sharp.
Industrialists may hope to dominate nature, and environmentalists to protect it — but both camps depend
on the same
dualism,
on a conception of nature as something to which humanity has no fundamental link, and in which we have no inherent place.
Renowned for his musings
on the nature of subjective experience, the 17th - century French philosopher and mathematician eloquently distilled the
dualism of mind and body intrinsic to the human condition — a phenomenon that continues to preoccupy 21st - century neuroscientists and philosophers alike.