Sentences with phrase «on enforcement of foreign awards»

Not exact matches

As part of China, Hong Kong is also a Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (the New York Convention) Contracting State, ensuring that arbitral awards issued where the seat of arbitration is Hong Kong benefit from this internationally renowned system of mutual recognition and enforcement of arbitEnforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (the New York Convention) Contracting State, ensuring that arbitral awards issued where the seat of arbitration is Hong Kong benefit from this internationally renowned system of mutual recognition and enforcement of arbitral aAwards (the New York Convention) Contracting State, ensuring that arbitral awards issued where the seat of arbitration is Hong Kong benefit from this internationally renowned system of mutual recognition and enforcement of arbitral aawards issued where the seat of arbitration is Hong Kong benefit from this internationally renowned system of mutual recognition and enforcement of arbitenforcement of arbitral awardsawards.
However, foreign investors may avoid all these difficulties by recourse to arbitration and indeed, Morocco is a member of the New York Convention on the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards and a member of The Washington Convention on ICSID.
See, in particular, Pieter Sanders, A Twenty Years» Review of the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, 13 Int» l Law 269 (1979); Jan Paulsson, Towards Minimum Standards of Enforcement: Feasibility of a Model Law, in Improving yhe Efficiency of Arbitration Agreements and Awards: 40 Years of Application of the New York Convention 574 (A.J. van den Berg ed., 1998); Albert Jan van den Berg, Hypothetical Draft Convention on the International Enforcement of Arbitration Agreements and Awards, AJB Rev 06 (May 2008).
Fouchard Gaillard Goldman on International Commercial Arbitration 987 - 88, para. 1700 (E. Gaillard, J. Savage eds., 1999); Christian Borris, Rudolf Hennecke, Commentary to Article V (1)(c), in New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards of 10 June 1958 — Commentary 309, 311, paras. 201 - 02 (R. Wolff ed., 2012); Paolo Michele Patocchi & Cesare Jermini, Article 194, in International Arbitration in Switzerland: an Introduction to and a Commentary on Articles 176 - 194 of the Swiss Private International Law Statute 661, para. 95 (S.V. Berti et al. eds., 2000); Ulrich Haas, The New York Convention on recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards of 1958, in Practitioner's Handbook on International Arbitration 499, paras. 39 - Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards of 10 June 1958 — Commentary 309, 311, paras. 201 - 02 (R. Wolff ed., 2012); Paolo Michele Patocchi & Cesare Jermini, Article 194, in International Arbitration in Switzerland: an Introduction to and a Commentary on Articles 176 - 194 of the Swiss Private International Law Statute 661, para. 95 (S.V. Berti et al. eds., 2000); Ulrich Haas, The New York Convention on recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards of 1958, in Practitioner's Handbook on International Arbitration 499, paras. 39 - 40 (Foreign Arbitral Awards of 10 June 1958 — Commentary 309, 311, paras. 201 - 02 (R. Wolff ed., 2012); Paolo Michele Patocchi & Cesare Jermini, Article 194, in International Arbitration in Switzerland: an Introduction to and a Commentary on Articles 176 - 194 of the Swiss Private International Law Statute 661, para. 95 (S.V. Berti et al. eds., 2000); Ulrich Haas, The New York Convention on recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards of 1958, in Practitioner's Handbook on International Arbitration 499, paras. 39 - 40 (FAwards of 10 June 1958 — Commentary 309, 311, paras. 201 - 02 (R. Wolff ed., 2012); Paolo Michele Patocchi & Cesare Jermini, Article 194, in International Arbitration in Switzerland: an Introduction to and a Commentary on Articles 176 - 194 of the Swiss Private International Law Statute 661, para. 95 (S.V. Berti et al. eds., 2000); Ulrich Haas, The New York Convention on recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards of 1958, in Practitioner's Handbook on International Arbitration 499, paras. 39 - enforcement of foreign arbitral awards of 1958, in Practitioner's Handbook on International Arbitration 499, paras. 39 - 40 (foreign arbitral awards of 1958, in Practitioner's Handbook on International Arbitration 499, paras. 39 - 40 (Fawards of 1958, in Practitioner's Handbook on International Arbitration 499, paras. 39 - 40 (F. - B.
Report of the Secretary - General: Study on the Application and Interpretation of the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (New York, 1958), A / CN.9 / 168, in X Yearbook of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law 106 (1979).
Travaux préparatoires, Draft Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards and Comments by Governments and Organizations, Report by the Secretary - General, Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, E / 2822, Annex II, pp. 18 - 19; Fouchard Gaillard Goldman on International Commercial Arbitration 454, para. 756 (E. Gaillard, J. Savage eds., 1999).
Patricia Nacimiento, Article V (1)(d), in Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards: A Global Commentary on the New York Convention 281, 286 (H. Kronke, P. Nacimiento et al. eds., 2010).
See Angela Kolbl, Commentary on Article XIV, in New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards of 10 June 1958 — Commentary 529, 531 (R. Wolff ed., 2012); Patricia Nacimiento, Article XIV, in Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards: A Global Commentary on the New York Convention 541, 544 (H. Kronke, P. Nacimiento et al. eds., 2010).
New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards of 10 June 1958 — Commentary
See also Patricia Nacimiento, Article XIV, in Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards: A Global Commentary on the New York Convention 541, 544 (H. Kronke, P. Nacimiento et al. eds., 2010).
Although article V (1)(d) moves beyond the text of the 1927 Geneva Convention, it is not as liberal as certain arbitration statutes, which attach even less importance than the New York Convention to the law of the country where the arbitration took place at the recognition and enforcement stage.854 As explained in the chapter on article VII, 855 the Convention sets only a «ceiling», or the maximum level of control, which courts of the Contracting States may exert over foreign arbitral awards.
With the advent of the 1958 United Nations Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (the New York Convention), the world finally had a treaty that would allow for enforcement of foreign arbitEnforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (the New York Convention), the world finally had a treaty that would allow for enforcement of foreign arbitral Foreign Arbitral Awards (the New York Convention), the world finally had a treaty that would allow for enforcement of foreign arbitral aAwards (the New York Convention), the world finally had a treaty that would allow for enforcement of foreign arbitenforcement of foreign arbitral foreign arbitral awardsawards.
Professor (Dr.) Albert Jan van den Berg, founding partner at Hanotiau & van den Berg, the world - class international arbitration boutique firm, spoke at the third annual Carolyn Lamm / White & Case International Arbitration Lecture at Miami Law, delivering «Reflections on the 60th Anniversary of the 1958 New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards
Travaux préparatoires, United Nations Conference on International Commercial Arbitration, Report by the Secretary - General — Corrigendum — Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, E / 2822 / Corr.
See Christian Borris, Rudolf Hennecke, Commentary to Article V (1)(c), in New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards of 10 June 1958 — Commentary 309, 328, para. 259 (R. Wolff ed., 2012).
By imposing stricter rules on recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards, a Contracting State will breach its obligations under the Convention.
Comments on the draft Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards
Comments by governments on the draft Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards
An overview of the history of the realisation of The Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (the New York Convention) can be found under «History 1923 - 1958»
E / 2822 / Add.1 - Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards: Comments by governments on the draft Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards
ECOSOC requests the Secretary - General to ascertain from the governments whether they consider it desirable to convene a conference to conclude a Convention on the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards, and whether they are prepared to participate in such a conference
Report of the Committee, recommending a Draft Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards
All the provinces in Canada, and I think the territories, have implemented the UN Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration and the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards.
Pursuant to the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (The New York Convention of 1958), which has been acceded to by 156 countries so far, arbitral awards may be recognised and enforced in these contracting sAwards (The New York Convention of 1958), which has been acceded to by 156 countries so far, arbitral awards may be recognised and enforced in these contracting sawards may be recognised and enforced in these contracting states.
Through the adoption of international conventions on the enforcement of foreign arbitral awards, the enforceability of a foreign (US and other international) arbitration award has become easier in many instances.
Noting the success that the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (New York Convention) has achieved for international arbitration, supporters of a conciliation convention are eager for UNCITRAL to develop an equivalent measure for international conciliation.
Please see Gilbertson Davis LLP's related practice areas webpages on International Commercial Arbitration, on Cross-Border Litigation, and on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitration Awards.
This website was created to host information on the implementation of the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, signed in New York on 10 June 1958, with a view of promoting its uniform and effective application throughout the world.
The contract provides that any dispute that might arise is to be settled by arbitration in Danubia, a country that has enacted the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration and is a party to the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards.
The 1958 Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, which governs the enforcement of arbitral awards worldwide, has been ratified by all EU Member States and will be unaffected by the UK's departure fEnforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, which governs the enforcement of arbitral awards worldwide, has been ratified by all EU Member States and will be unaffected by the UK's departure from tAwards, which governs the enforcement of arbitral awards worldwide, has been ratified by all EU Member States and will be unaffected by the UK's departure fenforcement of arbitral awards worldwide, has been ratified by all EU Member States and will be unaffected by the UK's departure from tawards worldwide, has been ratified by all EU Member States and will be unaffected by the UK's departure from the EU.
Canada acceded to the United Nations Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards in 1986 (the «UNCITRAL Model Law») declaring that it would apply the Convention only to differences arising out of legal relationships, whether contractual or not, that were considered commercial under the laws of Canada, except in the case of the Province of Quebec where the law did not provide for such limitation.
While enforcement, a foreign arbitral award shall, on the application being made to the appropriate court by any party, be enforced by execution by the court under the Code of Civil Procedure 1908, in the same manner as if it were a decree of the domestic Court.
Is your country a contracting state to the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards?
As Lord Mance observed: «Security pending the outcome of foreign proceedings is, in effect, the price of an adjournment which an award debtor is seeking, not to be imposed on an award debtor who is resisting enforcement on properly arguable grounds».
Supreme Court rules that challenge to enforcement of foreign arbitral award can not be conditional on payment of security
The Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, also known as the «New York Arbitration Convention» or the «New York Convention», is one of the key instruments in international arbitration.
The exception exists principally because the cross-border recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards is governed by the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards 1958 (the New York Convention), the priority of which is confirmed in a new Art 73 (2) to the Brussels enforcement of arbitral awards is governed by the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards 1958 (the New York Convention), the priority of which is confirmed in a new Art 73 (2) to the Brussels I (reawards is governed by the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards 1958 (the New York Convention), the priority of which is confirmed in a new Art 73 (2) to the Brussels Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards 1958 (the New York Convention), the priority of which is confirmed in a new Art 73 (2) to the Brussels I (reAwards 1958 (the New York Convention), the priority of which is confirmed in a new Art 73 (2) to the Brussels I (recast).
The challenges are the same as the ones raised on a regular basis, i.e. applicability of foreign law as governing law; enforcement and implementation of contracts as well as the enforcement of arbitration awards or foreign judgments.
Based on the factums submitted to the SCC, the appellant (Yugraneft) is arguing that international arbitral awards should be considered, at least for enforcement purposes, equivalent to foreign judgments, and, as such, should benefit from the 10 - year limitation period under s. 11 of the Alberta Limitations Act.
In Ontario, if the International Commercial Arbitration Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. I. 9 applies, then it provides that the UNCITRAL Model Law (and the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards as is contained in the UNCITRAL Model Law) is the law of Ontario.
The accession by the State of Bahrain to the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, 1958 shall in no way constitute recognition of Israel or be a cause for the establishment of any relations of any kind therewith.
Giving guidance to foreign and Chinese clients on the conduct of arbitration before LMAA for purpose of securing recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration awards in China.
If the award is subject to an action for setting aside in the country in which, or under the law of which, it is made («the country of origin»), the foreign court before which enforcement of the award is sought may adjourn its decision on enforcement (Article VI).
Upon ratification: On the basis of reciprocity, the Republic of Argentina will apply the Convention only to the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards made in the territory of another Contracting State.
Advised on the conduct of arbitration before LMAA for the purpose of securing recognition and the enforcement of foreign arbitration awards in China.
His practice covers a wide range of PRC law issues with a focus on litigation at different levels of PRC courts and arbitration matters in PRC including cross-border litigation and arbitration proceedings, and foreign arbitration awards recognition and enforcement in China.
The Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, done in New York, 10 June 1958 (the New York Convention), is described as the most successful treaty in private international law.
It is understood that the accession of the State of Kuwait to the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, done at New York, on the 10th of June 1958, does not mean in any way recognition of Israel or entering with it into relations governed by the Convention thereto acceded by the State of Kuwait.
Zimbabwe is also a signatory to the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards.
Canada and UAE — New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards In 2006, United Arab Emirates joined 137 other nations in acceding to the United Nations Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (the so - called 1958 New York Convention).
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z