It focuses
on equality of outcomes rather than equality of opportunity.
Not exact matches
With
equality of outcome you are
on your way to communism or an ideology that imitates communism.
«That the world may believe» is the
outcome of the manifestation
of holiness,
equality and unity modeled
on the Holy Triunitarian structure,» the Metropolitan said.
Miller 2.0 I think the important point
on which it would be worth trying to build agreement is that almost all social democratic and liberal socialist conceptions
of equality and fairness do have scope for legitimate or merited differences
of outcome.
While NOM insists Democratic Assemblyman David Weprin's «yes» vote
on gay marriage could cost him the race, HRC stresses that no matter who wins tonight (assuming it's not too close to immediately call, which is a distinct possibility, given the history
of past NY House specials) marriage
equality «did not play an influential, even modest, role in the
outcome.»
The
outcome of this case should spur Nigerians to always insist
on the rule
of law, no matter the short term inconveniences, as it plays a crucial role in ensuring that political rights and civil liberties are safe and that the
equality and dignity
of all citizens are not at risk.»
With the study
on equality of opportunity, an
outcome of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, Coleman developed his «first draft»
of those norms.
This lack
of modern energy acts as a major brake
on efforts to reduce poverty, improve health, education, gender
equality and a range
of other positive economic and social
outcomes.
The
Equality Impact Statements analyze provincial legislation using gender as a focal point to compare the intentions
of law - makers to meet standards
of fairness and
equality with the actual
outcomes of legislative and policy choice; the ultimate goal was to ensure that provincial legislation was having a positive impact
on British Columbians.
A more wide - ranging definition
of equality, which focuses
on outcomes (such as in terms
of equality of protection
of culture) rather than
on inputs (such as by purely guaranteeing
equality of opportunities, as if there were a level playing field) is needed.
I call
on all Australian governments to implement these recommendations in full, with all possible urgency, so that all Australians can enjoy
equality of opportunity and equal socioeconomic
outcomes, and we can all reach our full potential.
The first 5 years
of life are critical for the development
of language and cognitive skills.1 By kindergarten entry, steep social gradients in reading and math ability, with successively poorer
outcomes for children in families
of lower social class, are already apparent.2 — 4 Early cognitive ability is, in turn, predictive
of later school performance, educational attainment, and health in adulthood5 — 7 and may serve as a marker for the quality
of early brain development and a mechanism for the transmission
of future health inequalities.8 Early life represents a time period
of most
equality and yet, beginning with in utero conditions and extending through early childhood, a wide range
of socially stratified risk and protective factors may begin to place children
on different trajectories
of cognitive development.9, 10
The approach to
equality based
on a comparison
of outcomes between Indigenous people and non-Indigenous people in relation to employment, home ownership, education and welfare, can not be simply applied to native title.
[7] The possible conflict between the policy objectives
of choice (or «self - determination») and
of equality of outcomes can lead to significant difficulty in interpreting statistics
on program
outcomes.