Not exact matches
DO maintain
equality of treatment for different religions (does not mean acquiescence with anything they want whether Moslem women's veils
on I»D's or praying 5 times at work..
I find it interesting that the day after you wrote about the evil
treatment of ministers in the United Methodist Church who are in favor
of marriage
equality in the church, you wrote this blog
on how women could affect
equality within the church.
Two people cash have differing opinions
on abortion, h0m0s3xuality, capital punishment, women's rights, race
equality, the
treatment of children, animals, and the environment, plus a host
of other topics, and still be justified in calling themselves «Christian».
Commenting
on the report by Women and
Equalities Commission, Chris Keates, General Secretary
of the NASUWT, the largest teachers» union in the UK, said: «The latest report from the Women and
Equalities Commission sadly reflects and confirms the issues and concerns the NASUWT has been raising with Government and employers about the
treatment of women teachers for some time.
They fight for their version
of equality on all the things that suit women — but are very quick to point out that women need special protections and
treatment on other things.»
Then follows «mental health
of leftist activists», an extensive section
on bias in social psychology and nmore general problems being addressed by the Heterodox Academy effort, the sociology
of single - parenting, studies involving race / gender with IQ, personality, intellectual abilities and differences in interest, genetics and human evolution, enforced gender
equality, scientific socialism, eugenics and the zero - population - growth movement, misguided environmentalism, and finally, a bit about climate change, rapidly followed by the «food police» and «diet wars», and then returning to a
treatment of the Climate Wars.
Comparator group analysis, with its focus
on finding differential
treatment, is intended to serve a very particular objective
of anti-discrimination and
equality guarantees, that
of preventing difference, or untrue characteristics, from being taken into account.
HC had submitted that her exclusion from entitlement (by three statutory instruments)(i) involved unlawful discrimination against her and / or her children; (ii) breached the EU Charter, arts 24 and 34 (requiring equal
treatment); and (iii) breached the PSED, as there was insufficient recognition
of the effects
on women and children in the defendants»
equality analysis and statements.
After years
of this arbitrary and discriminatory
treatment, Little Sisters and the B.C. Civil Liberties Association challenged the constitutionality
of certain provisions
of the Customs Act
on the basis that they violated Little Sisters» freedom
of expression and
equality rights under the Canadian Charter
of Rights and Freedoms.
He also has experience
of dealing with such issues in the health sector, and has advised
on matters such as the compatibility with Convention rights and
equalities legislation
of policies for the
treatment of funding.
Rather than the courts focusing
on the differential
treatment on the basis
of race, a substantive
equality approach focuses
on the impact
of that
treatment on the racial group concerned.
On this view, differential treatment on the basis of race that seeks to achieve equality is not discriminator
On this view, differential
treatment on the basis of race that seeks to achieve equality is not discriminator
on the basis
of race that seeks to achieve
equality is not discriminatory.
(a) the guarantees
of equality before the law and racial non-discrimination [34] in article 26
of the International Covenant
on Civil and Political Rights («ICCPR») and articles 2 and 5
of the Convention
on the Elimination
of All Forms
of Racial Discrimination («CERD»), in particular the obligation in article 5
of CERD to prohibit and to eliminate racial discrimination and to guarantee the right
of everyone to
equality before the law, including in the enjoyment
of (a) the right to equal
treatment before the tribunals and all other organs administering justice, (d)(v) the right to own property alone as well as in association with others [35], and (d)(vii) the right to freedom
of religion [36];
The suspension decision potentially limits the right
of Sri Lankan and Afghan nationals to
equality before the law including equal
treatment before tribunals and other organs administering justice (protected under article 5
of ICERD), and the right to freedom from arbitrary detention (protected under article 9
of the International Covenant
on Civil and Political Rights).
On the one hand, the government's explanations accept that the obligations under ICERD and the ICCPR can be met by the provision
of substantive
equality (ie., different
treatment if justified by the circumstances
of a situation, when judged in accordance with the purposes and objectives
of the Convention).