Sentences with phrase «on facts and evidence»

Depending on the facts and evidence of each case, the «standard» rights and responsibilities can be altered by the judge.

But while his legal analysis was not specifically disapproved, the Court of Appeal did criticise his conclusions on the facts and evidence and also considerably altered the stage lighting surrounding considerations of bias and predetermination in local authority decisions.

As lawyers, we have to rely on the facts and evidence.

Fourth, having completed a first full draft of a judgment, review and revise it several times to ensure that it addresses all the issues and provides a coherent, logical analysis of each issue which fully rests on the facts and evidence.

It held that, on the facts and evidence of the case, the development expenditure of # 200,000 would not have added to the value of the property.

An objective review may not be the most exciting thing to read, I understand, but it does something that a number of game reviews do not — it offers the reader a chance to form their own conclusion based on the facts and evidence presented, rather than being subtly nudged one way or another due to the reviewer's personal thoughts or veiled bias delivered via semantics.

I am pleased that this task force is set up to work across party lines to make legislative recommendations based on facts and evidence in the areas of mental illness, school safety and gun control.»

We have confidence in our judiciary, and given the opportunity, they will deliver a fair and satisfactory judgment based on the facts and evidence adduced before them.

At the League Against Cruel Sports, we rely on facts and evidence to back up our campaigns, so our investigators took some secret footage to see for themselves if snare operators were following the Code of Practice.

(See above;]) So her style rubs me the wrong way, and it so happens that I've only read posts light on facts and evidence and heavy on sarcasm or condescension.

Our understanding of nature, however limited is still based on facts and evidence... you have none.

Our understanding of nature and reality, however limited, is still based on facts and evidence... you have none.

The problem is people whose beliefs are based on fact and evidence can be persuaded with facts and evidence.

Not exact matches

If you need evidence of this fact, consider China's massive state mining operations and stake in Bitcoin, undeniably viewed as a tool for leverage on a global scale.

If you've spent any time at all on Twitter, you've probably realized that facts and evidence often take a backseat to opinion and conjecture.

The fact that all these supposed creations have been spotted (and then debunked) in Martian rock formations has done nothing to cool the Internet's ardor for seeing evidence of intelligent life on the red planet.

Further evidence comes from the interesting fact that the parchment version of the Declaration of Independence that is on display and kept in the United States National Archives wasn't actually written until July 19th; this being a copy of the approved text that was announced to the world on July 4th, with about 150 - 200 copies being made on paper and distributed on that date (26 of which are still around today, thus pre-dating what is now generally thought of as the «original»).

In a comment on his own post, MacMillan said he had since been in contact with a couple of Facebook staffers about the incident, and both said they could find no record of the image or post having been taken down, and in fact couldn't find any evidence that anything of that nature had ever been uploaded.

«The evidence that I have seen is that jobs are in fact increased because there is economic activity increased and because people have a little bit of spare money, which on $ 11 an hour you never have.»

This week, Mr. Trump and his allies seized on the fact that Democrats had paid the firm for the research as evidence that the dossier was part of a political smear campaign.

The economists» bearish lurch this week reflects the fact that soft data and anecdotal evidence suggest the cash shortage is beginning to take a toll, a challenge that will weigh on the Reserve Bank of India on Wednesday when it meets to decide its crunch - fighting strategy.

This ignores the inconvenient fact that the investigation did not begin with, or arise from Christopher Steele or the dossier, and that the investigation would persist on the basis of wholly independent evidence had Christopher Steele never entered the picture.

Clearly, we know that it is not as evidenced by the fact that many businesses rely on it and a growing number of businesses are investing in their content marketing.

This evolution was hastened with China's membership in the World Trade Organization in late 2001, and is evidenced by the fact that China is taking on an increasingly large role in global economic and developmental forums.

Go on line and look up «evolution» or «scientific method» or any number of millions of scientific evidence that evolution is fact and is happenening every day in our changing environment.

I am not saying that it is easy to ignore what you feel to be facts and truths in order to take on a faith, but you have to think that you could be wrong even if all the evidence is telling you that you are right.

The fact that atheists spend so much time on faith and belief blogs is evidence that atheism leads to insecurity, too.

I think «x» because I see «y» Theory: An even more educated guess based on research facts, and evidence.

And I know of only one way of knowing the truth: Examening facts and evidence and form hypothesises, theories and experiments based on thAnd I know of only one way of knowing the truth: Examening facts and evidence and form hypothesises, theories and experiments based on thand evidence and form hypothesises, theories and experiments based on thand form hypothesises, theories and experiments based on thand experiments based on that.

All that, plus they want to hide fact that all the premises of their religion around the divinity of Christ and the supposed benevolent nature of their rather horrid BOMITS and so on have zero support in evidence, and their bizarro ceremonies and smokescreens don't fool people quite as well as they did in pre-internet times.

As such public policies, laws, and int.itutions would be based on facts, evidence, and reason as opposed to religious based ideology.

However, they have looked at many truths (facts based on physical evidence) and non existent physical evidence of any God and have made a personal decision that the existence of any God is highly improbable and defies almost all logic.

To pile on the ironies, Le Rider carefully demonstrates through a minute examination of the relevant evidence that the real Vienna was in fact nothing like the city that her artists and theorizers felt they were living in.

In fact some of the evidence you didn't mention which was popular fodder in the past has already been proven incorrect (horses in the americas before the spanish, and the BofM reference to elephants) Both considered ridiculous errors by Joseph Smith until elephants appeared on ancient Mayan / Incan temples and horses from the Brea tar pits were dated before the spanish.

I call BS on Jimbo about «a huge avalanche of historical evidence and archeology» and I call BS on your statement because you only refer to «common knowledge» I've seen what Christian common knowledge is like and it often runs a bit shy on facts..

I follow evidence, and while I readily admit that I am opinionated, I make every effort to base my opinions on fact, not what I want personally to believe.

historical Jesus, lmfao... show me any historical evidence of jesus... let's start with his remains... they don't exist - your explanation, he rose to the heavens... historical evidence - no remains, no proof of existence (not a disproof either, just not a proof)... then let's start with other historians writing about the life of Jesus around his time or shortly after, as outside neutral observers... that doesn't exist either (not a disproof again, just not a proof)... we can go on and on... the fact is, there is not a single proving evidence of Jesus's life in an historical context... there is no existence of Jesus in a scientific context either (virgin birth... riiiiiight)... it is just written in a book, and stuck in your head... you have a right to believe in what you must... just don't base it on history or science... you believe because you do... it is your right... but try not to put reason into your faith; that's when you start sounding unreasonable, borderline crazy...

The best we can do as people is look at the evidence and base our beliefs on the facts that we are presented with.

I would «base [my] info on inre the non-existence of God, heaven and hell, etc» on the absolute lack of even a shred of hard verifiable evidence for these extraordinary claims, and the fact that even after thousands of years of frantic and determined efforts by the most ardent and intelligent proponents of these claims, they still have been completely unable to demonstrate them in any testable manner.

That would just be ludicrous), as time goes on, there seems to be more and more evidence coming up that there isn't a god, especially YOUR kind of god at least, as the Bible just seems to be getting destroyed with actual facts.

Regarding evolution the fact (Primewonk's definition) and evolution the scientific theory (the well - tested and validated explanation for extant and extinct biodiversity stemming from physical evidence from every relevant scientific discipline), they stand on their own evidence regardless of how exactly the first replicators appeared.

However, as evidence of the fact that Christianity has no monopoly on the abuse of power, our century has been checkered with instances of gross inhumanity perpetrated not just by post-Christian but by anti-Christian ideologues from the right and from the left.

It is the fact that non-functional sequences of dna have been passed down from parent species prior to a split in sub species or classifications and exist on the exact same location within the strand of the other sub species, which was the final evidence convincing me that God did indeed use evolution as His means of creation.

[26] K. Miller, Finding Darwin's God: A. Scientist's Search for Common Ground Between God and Evolution (New York: HarperColliins, 1999), 53f, distinguishes the «fact» of evolution, grounded on so much evidence, from various theories of evolution.

Grab a science book and read up on how earthquakes and hurricanes happen, believe it or not, there is evidence (facts — if you don't know what evidence is) that explains how these natural disasters happen, and no magical being in the clouds is in the formula.

And there is, in fact, very little evidence that champions of ecclesial pluralism have bent over backwards to insure that their opponents are given a fair hearing on occasions of public debate, nor are they conspicuously tolerant or open - minded when they happen themselves to be in positions of extra-ecclesial authority — as journal editors, perhaps, or as deans of theology faculties.

Newman goes on to argue that claiming that faith must always proceed works in living the Christian life is «mistaking a following in order of conception for a following in order of time...» In fact, he writes, our works are «the concomitant development and evidence, and instrumental cause, as well as the subsequent result of faith.»

Once you get through the deception and their crazy no - fact doctrine based on book where it's history has been proven false due to the lack of DNA and Archeological evidence that does not support the BOOK OF MORMON, I am glad this guy was intelligent enough to leave.

The problem lies in the fact that modern society has evolved effective justice and penalty, based on the collection of facts and evidence.

I highly suggest watching Cosmos so you can be educated outside of your bible on actual facts and evidence.