If anything, there should be a moratorium
on failing traditional public schools, he said.
Not exact matches
It alleges that a review of the research
on charter
schools leads to the conclusions that, overall, charter
schools: 1)
fail to raise student achievement more than
traditional district
schools do; 2) aren't innovative and don't pass innovations along to district
schools; 3) exacerbate the racial and ethnic isolation of students; 4) provide a worse environment for teachers than district
schools; and 5) spend more
on administration and less
on instruction than
public schools.
That said, this holds true of
traditional public schools as well, many of which can be allowed to
fail for years
on end.
In spite of the sincere efforts that have been made to date to spur innovation in teaching and learning in the
traditional public school sector, the data show that just infusing more per - pupil
public school spending in the past has
failed to propel the U.S. beyond its peer countries
on international rankings of student achievement.
For example, in 2011, AFT engaged the NAACP, now
on the union's payroll, to file a lawsuit to keep some children in Harlem in their
failing traditional public schools, instead of allowing them to attend nearby superior (non-unionized) charter
schools.
They argue the money could be better spent
on bringing innovations to
traditional public schools, rather than picking «winners and losers» and propping up a specific few nonprofit charter operators, whose «
schools of hope» could essentially replace
failing neighborhood
schools.
But NYC's
traditional public school system is
on a fast track to nowhere without a successful strategy to turn around the vast majority of non-charter, non-selective admissions
schools that continue to
fail to prepare students for colleges and careers.
But if we're really concerned about quality — responding to Shelton — Shavar Jeffries, president of Democrats for Education Reform Now (DFER), said we need to call for a «moratorium
on the
traditional public schools that have been
failing [our children] for generations.»
The NYT article
fails to mention that the same study found that «
on average, charter students in Michigan gain an additional two months of learning in reading and math over their [
traditional public school] counterparts.