Sentences with phrase «on flawed logic»

My concern with the decision in Kansas was based on the flawed logic that went into it.

This conclusion is based on flawed logic.

So the long and short of your question is: Yes, I know what the crucifixion means to most Christians, however that has no bearing on the real world for it's based on flawed logic and faulty creation myths.

Not exact matches

Almost every believer I have ever talked to wants to use the logic of complex creations requiring a creator but fail to grasp the simple and unavoidable flaw in that logic which is that the super complex entlty it would take to design and build the universe would then by its own complexity require a more complex entlty to have created it and so on.

You have, however, succesfully demonstrated the fundamental flaws of religion: It rests on untestable assertions, logic - defying presumptions and blind appeals to authority cobbled together in an attempt to create a screen from genuine inquiry.

flawed logic, our statements right now are based on the idea that he did nt.

Since you can not and admit to being unable to make a determination on the God issue, your logic is fatally flawed and thus your post is self - contradictory.

I would suggest to you, sincerely, that you not throw away the chance to know God in an intimate and personal way and to have eternal life, on the basis of your deeply flawed logic.

The Meno, Plato's only dialogue on the subject of education, features a title character whose failures to learn are more frequently the results of flaws in his character than they are the results of lapses in his logic.

Obvious inconsistancies, obvious logic flaws, and some flat out lies of stories, and you would build on that?

Pin your flawed logic on that.

I also said you are using flawed, self - serving logic to distort data and conclude that 100 % of responsibility for high utility rates falls on one party.

The abandonment of the cap is based on a concern to meet a need for additional school places, but the logic is flawed.

However, this logic is greatly flawed: when you lift your hips off the bench, your body adopts an arched position from your feet to your shoulders and that exaggerates the strain on your spine.

But when your case against Common Core leans so heavily on muddled logic and flawed science, it suggests that your arguments don't add up.

As for the metrics that you've described in measuring the «professional» standard, they are flawed in the following respects: Professional via publication — publishers are profit - driven, not a good indicator of excellence; Professional through number in print — numbers can be altered with marketing and time (by this logic, the Bible, Kuran, and the Communist Manifesto are perhaps the most professional work ever written); Money — there are plenty of professional idiots out there with more money than deserved; Peer review — depends on the peer.

However, this myth is not based on any solid evidence or statistics, rather it is a general statement that is factually incorrect and usually based on broad assumptions and flawed logic.

Don't diss all pit bulls for actions of a few The Sentinel editorial «Pit - bull attack» on June 13 is flawed by faulty logic; the issue is proper control of animals.

Sierra adventure games had many flaws — the unpredictable parser that required instructions to be written «just so», the unexpected and seemingly unavoidable deaths, the genuinely insane puzzle logic and not to mention the fact that it was frequently possible to die on the very last screen of the game because you forgot to pick up some innocuous - looking item right at the start of the game.

(Although, given that your first post in this thread told Gavin that you «would point out a flaw in his logic», with no caveats or maybes, on a subject often discussed here, on which Gavin is certainly a high expert, I'm not sure what you mean when you say «tenor».)

Luckily, no one went over board with their confidence levels and pressed for global action based on slightly flawed logic.

If guilt by association were actually valid according to «the basic rules of logic and reasoning,» as strong a case (or stronger) could easily be made for you, Joanne Nova (via Shell and ExxonMobil), being called a terrorist as for James Hansen (via UK writer Keith Farnish) being called a terrorist; I knew no one would call me on any flaw in that reasoning, since that is precisely the reasoning being used to smear Hansen.

Wow, the logic on this website is so flawed and week that I just don't believe your clearly biased arguments.

State relied on this same flawed logic to approve the original Alberta Clipper tar sands pipeline and the first Keystone pipeline.

We can get to the follow - on logic later, it might be fun — but we can't get anywhere if we don't start with correcting your flawed understanding of the foundational components.

I personally find it strange in a system of such complexity with so many unknowns, that one MUST accept black and white, if / then logic, based on overtly incomplete and possibly flawed knowledge.

If you count papers which don't address the issue at all you could bring in hundreds of thousands of papers on quantum physics, stellar cartography, economics, sociiology, et cetera and claim that since none of these take any position on global warming there is less than 1 % support for it... or any other subject you want to dismiss via blatantly flawed logic.

Read your measured but notable comment on the «RC» Existence of any dichotomy of Gavin's understanding is barred from his public pronouncements even more so by his recent carrier elevation; result is a number of obvious flaws in his logic, as distinct from his unquestionable intellectual ability (I am bound to say so, he got a degree from my old university, albeit one stage higher, but then standards deteriorated somewhat by time he joined).

If we want to know the cause of the retreat of the Kilimanjaro glacier, we can't rely on A+B — > C logic (especially flawed A+B — > C logic).

The basis of the flawed logic leading to U.S. wood being burned to power Europe, conservationists say, is an accounting formula: According to E.U. policy, wood pellets are considered a carbon - neutral fuel source, based on the principle that regenerating forests will eventually recapture the carbon released when the trees were cut.

... it is a very large area with entrenched issues, different issues, large land mass, lots of underlying interests, lots of overlaps, to think that within a very short time frame you could actually effectively amalgamate or expand the Queensland South boundaries and just flick the switch on the 1st July and everything would be hunky dorey is an exercise in naivety... there was compelling logic behind the amalgamation but it was the planning and implementation that was flawed.