Sentences with phrase «on flawed science»

Nevada Gov. Kenny Guinn quickly rejected the recommendation, saying it was based on flawed science.
The whole and entire basis of the lawsuit is the claim that «the IPCC, and therefore the EPA, relied on flawed science to conclude that greenhouse emissions endanger public health and welfare», and Texas is seeking to block the EPA regulations explicitly and solely «Because the Administration predicated its Endangerment Finding on the IPCC's questionable facts.»
Examining the ongoing campaign to eradicate Hawaii's outdoor cats, one soon discovers a familiar pattern: the rationale is often based on flawed science (often produced by government agencies).
He says they're based on flawed science and are not designed to keep animals in good health.
The notion that a low salt diet is better for us began about 200 years ago and was founded on flawed science.
But critics, mostly in the fishing industry, charged that the clampdown was based on flawed science.

Not exact matches

Meanwhile, a Dutch computer science student got some press last week when he claimed all chats on WhatsApp are compromised due to flaws in the app's encryption.
Getting an «F» on a science test isn't bad, but it reveals a flaw in one's knowledge.
I know based on science that this universe we exist in made us, so why could it not posess all the imagined powers of your God without the personality flaws?
The «science» on which evolution is based is seriously flawed.
«(And so) there is now a small but vociferous group who claim that philosophy of science should take Kant more seriously, in particular that it should admit that its unabashedly naturalistic take on science is deeply flawed.
If you want to start saying science is flawed, if you want to say it can't be counted on, you can kindly put down your computer, throw away all technology, give up modern healthcare and go live in a cave.
i believe it works on many levels but science is fundamentally flawed in its dogmatic approach to reason and reality.
He described our advocacy for good food as based on «flawed science
What about that «flawed» science that The Cornucopia Institute depended on when exposing concerns that food - grade carrageenan poses human health risks as an inflammatory agent and possible carcinogen?
So you're saying any studies that show formula yields better results (not that Tanya was making such claims) would be due to the impossibility of developing a fair sampling / testing method, but you have no problem extolling the virtues of breast feeding, not to mention perpetuating this modern day phrenology of head circumference as a determination of future IQ, based on the same flawed science?
Rosin poses that the science on breastfeeding is flawed.
However, I do recall a few epidemiologists pointing out the flaws in * your * criticisms when you wrote a post about it on Science Based Medicine.
«The problem of police killings of unarmed black victims should not be viewed merely as a problem of flawed action on the part of individual police officers, but more as a consequence of the broader problem of structural racism,» said senior author Michael Siegel, professor of community health sciences at BUSPH.
Although a strong case can be made that the endangerment finding is scientifically flawed, the Murkowski resolution neither takes nor implies a position on climate science.
Several questions in the 2010 survey addressed the «Climategate» controversy, which brought allegations of flawed science by researchers contributing to the work of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
That's why science journalism has an important dual purpose: to report on science's advances and benefits while also illuminating its flaws and shortcomings, so that science can improve and better serve society and thus continue to warrant the support and respect that so many of us have been giving it.
This is particularly so when such accusations are based on impure science, a flawed legal foundation, and completely inadequate or inappropriate public policy.»
An international consortium of scientists that was recently assembled to review the science on BPA for the German UmweltBundesAmt (that country's equivalent of the Environmental Protection Agency) determined that the research FDA used in its safety assessment was flawed because it failed to consider the chemical's effects on behavior and prostate development, according to a copy of the group's conclusions provided to ScientificAmerican.com.
Collar says the XENON researchers are relying on shoddy science and flawed analysis to debunk DAMA's claim.
To some, the deepest flaw in a draft proposal on GOF studies from a working group of the National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity (NSABB) was its imprecise effort to define those studies that are so dangerous that they should not be allowed.
Four months after a paper it published on the genetics of centenarians was criticized for possible flaws, Science published an Editorial Expression of Concern about the work, noting that the authors are redoing their data.
How did a deeply flawed paper, which contradicts mainstream science on climate change, pass peer review?
The entire lipid hypothesis was based on bad science - the flawed and fraudulent research of Ancel Keys.
This is a major part of the solid science you will need to know if anyone seeks to disagree with you when you share this information; this study is really the foundation that triggered the massive emphasis on low - fat diets and the flawed belief that cholesterol and animal fats are so pernicious.
The study it's based on is just bad science, and shame on you Dr. Greger for not seeing the giant flaws in it.
I'm constantly monitoring the science on extending healthspan and if something better comes along or one of my current practices is proven flawed I'll happily update my plans and let you all know.
Bryan Walsh published an article in the June issue of Time magazine called «Ending the War on Fat,» that explored both the history of how fat has been classified as the nutritional public enemy number one, and how this science was flawed.
But when your case against Common Core leans so heavily on muddled logic and flawed science, it suggests that your arguments don't add up.
A more flawed piece would be quite a find, but, as the author resorts to claiming logical fallacy in Howey's «science»... let me point out the one which his entire thesis rests on:
«Today, I call on the leaders of the American Bird Conservancy, The Wildlife Society, and the leadership of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, who persist in using flawed science and vicious rhetoric like Dauphine's to blame cats for species decline, to stop.»
One can see a number of basic flaws here; the complete lack of appreciation of the importance of natural variability on short time scales, the common but erroneous belief that any attribution of past climate change to solar or other forcing means that CO2 has no radiative effect, and a hopeless lack of familiarity of the basic science of detection and attribution.
And the crescendo: ``... the subject paper... does not follow the scientific methodology of proof, it disagrees with observations, it is based on flawed referenced papers, and it utilizes a flawed science that is unrecognized by most of the world.»
However, it is not foolproof — a deeply flawed paper can end up being published under a number of different potential circumstances: (i) the work is submitted to a journal outside the relevant field (e.g. a paper on paleoclimate submitted to a social science journal) where the reviewers are likely to be chosen from a pool of individuals lacking the expertise to properly review the paper, (ii) too few or too unqualified a set of reviewers are chosen by the editor, (iii) the reviewers or editor (or both) have agendas, and overlook flaws that invalidate the paper's conclusions, and (iv) the journal may process and publish so many papers that individual manuscripts occasionally do not get the editorial attention they deserve.
I find it instructive that in all the years and after all the post of asking people of your mindset to do so, not one — not one — has ever been able to post five scientifically sound, peer - reviewed papers on climate science that have not been shown to be flawed, in error or that have been replicable while showing clear evidence that the existing body of climate science is wrong.
On the other hand, the same issue had a Pielke Jr. article in it, in which he once more trots out the claim that because virtually the whole mainstream climate science community (which Pielke refers to loosely as «pro Kyoto» lambasted the flawed Baliunas et al Climate Research article, we all must be letting our political convictions over-ride our scientific judgement.
On bad media: There has been plenty of misinformation and / or disinformation on climate disseminated by the media over the years — much of it related to the AGW point above (conflating all climate science with flawed examples, or mashing up meaningsOn bad media: There has been plenty of misinformation and / or disinformation on climate disseminated by the media over the years — much of it related to the AGW point above (conflating all climate science with flawed examples, or mashing up meaningson climate disseminated by the media over the years — much of it related to the AGW point above (conflating all climate science with flawed examples, or mashing up meanings).
Of course we have probably all had at least some scepticism of aspects of climate science, but we examine these things, and realise the flaws in denier myths and move on.
In 2001, I learned just how flawed the «parks and fences» model could be when I reported on a Science paper showing how the creation of a panda preserve backfired.
While I could go on and on... finally, the AGW models (conjectures based upon a belief but not upon science) have entirely failed to hold up because they were so flawed to start with.
But I suggest we can do perfectly good science on a flawed premise: sustainability.
The same can not be said of M&M who keep adapting their attacks, making fundamental flaws, and publish in non-peer reviewed journals on social aspects of science.
You stick with flawed models based on an imaginary effect — I'll stay with actual science and repeatable results....
Not only that but what a really weak edifice our science and scientific institutions must be on that that the mainstream institutions are likewise hoodwinked into supporting flawed science and that they have persuaded even Bush and co â $ «who are rolling back environmental regulations left right and center - that they can no longer contest the science.
This myopic fixation on anthropogenic factors became its fatal flaw, leading not only to a warped and incomplete understanding of what drives our climate but also to the politicization and corruption of the IPCC process and, unfortunately, of a good part of climate science itself.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z