Nevada Gov. Kenny Guinn quickly rejected the recommendation, saying it was based
on flawed science.
The whole and entire basis of the lawsuit is the claim that «the IPCC, and therefore the EPA, relied
on flawed science to conclude that greenhouse emissions endanger public health and welfare», and Texas is seeking to block the EPA regulations explicitly and solely «Because the Administration predicated its Endangerment Finding on the IPCC's questionable facts.»
Examining the ongoing campaign to eradicate Hawaii's outdoor cats, one soon discovers a familiar pattern: the rationale is often based
on flawed science (often produced by government agencies).
He says they're based
on flawed science and are not designed to keep animals in good health.
The notion that a low salt diet is better for us began about 200 years ago and was founded
on flawed science.
But critics, mostly in the fishing industry, charged that the clampdown was based
on flawed science.
Not exact matches
Meanwhile, a Dutch computer
science student got some press last week when he claimed all chats
on WhatsApp are compromised due to
flaws in the app's encryption.
Getting an «F»
on a
science test isn't bad, but it reveals a
flaw in one's knowledge.
I know based
on science that this universe we exist in made us, so why could it not posess all the imagined powers of your God without the personality
flaws?
The «
science»
on which evolution is based is seriously
flawed.
«(And so) there is now a small but vociferous group who claim that philosophy of
science should take Kant more seriously, in particular that it should admit that its unabashedly naturalistic take
on science is deeply
flawed.
If you want to start saying
science is
flawed, if you want to say it can't be counted
on, you can kindly put down your computer, throw away all technology, give up modern healthcare and go live in a cave.
i believe it works
on many levels but
science is fundamentally
flawed in its dogmatic approach to reason and reality.
He described our advocacy for good food as based
on «
flawed science.»
What about that «
flawed»
science that The Cornucopia Institute depended
on when exposing concerns that food - grade carrageenan poses human health risks as an inflammatory agent and possible carcinogen?
So you're saying any studies that show formula yields better results (not that Tanya was making such claims) would be due to the impossibility of developing a fair sampling / testing method, but you have no problem extolling the virtues of breast feeding, not to mention perpetuating this modern day phrenology of head circumference as a determination of future IQ, based
on the same
flawed science?
Rosin poses that the
science on breastfeeding is
flawed.
However, I do recall a few epidemiologists pointing out the
flaws in * your * criticisms when you wrote a post about it
on Science Based Medicine.
«The problem of police killings of unarmed black victims should not be viewed merely as a problem of
flawed action
on the part of individual police officers, but more as a consequence of the broader problem of structural racism,» said senior author Michael Siegel, professor of community health
sciences at BUSPH.
Although a strong case can be made that the endangerment finding is scientifically
flawed, the Murkowski resolution neither takes nor implies a position
on climate
science.
Several questions in the 2010 survey addressed the «Climategate» controversy, which brought allegations of
flawed science by researchers contributing to the work of the Intergovernmental Panel
on Climate Change.
That's why
science journalism has an important dual purpose: to report
on science's advances and benefits while also illuminating its
flaws and shortcomings, so that
science can improve and better serve society and thus continue to warrant the support and respect that so many of us have been giving it.
This is particularly so when such accusations are based
on impure
science, a
flawed legal foundation, and completely inadequate or inappropriate public policy.»
An international consortium of scientists that was recently assembled to review the
science on BPA for the German UmweltBundesAmt (that country's equivalent of the Environmental Protection Agency) determined that the research FDA used in its safety assessment was
flawed because it failed to consider the chemical's effects
on behavior and prostate development, according to a copy of the group's conclusions provided to ScientificAmerican.com.
Collar says the XENON researchers are relying
on shoddy
science and
flawed analysis to debunk DAMA's claim.
To some, the deepest
flaw in a draft proposal
on GOF studies from a working group of the National
Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity (NSABB) was its imprecise effort to define those studies that are so dangerous that they should not be allowed.
Four months after a paper it published
on the genetics of centenarians was criticized for possible
flaws,
Science published an Editorial Expression of Concern about the work, noting that the authors are redoing their data.
How did a deeply
flawed paper, which contradicts mainstream
science on climate change, pass peer review?
The entire lipid hypothesis was based
on bad
science - the
flawed and fraudulent research of Ancel Keys.
This is a major part of the solid
science you will need to know if anyone seeks to disagree with you when you share this information; this study is really the foundation that triggered the massive emphasis
on low - fat diets and the
flawed belief that cholesterol and animal fats are so pernicious.
The study it's based
on is just bad
science, and shame
on you Dr. Greger for not seeing the giant
flaws in it.
I'm constantly monitoring the
science on extending healthspan and if something better comes along or one of my current practices is proven
flawed I'll happily update my plans and let you all know.
Bryan Walsh published an article in the June issue of Time magazine called «Ending the War
on Fat,» that explored both the history of how fat has been classified as the nutritional public enemy number one, and how this
science was
flawed.
But when your case against Common Core leans so heavily
on muddled logic and
flawed science, it suggests that your arguments don't add up.
A more
flawed piece would be quite a find, but, as the author resorts to claiming logical fallacy in Howey's «
science»... let me point out the one which his entire thesis rests
on:
«Today, I call
on the leaders of the American Bird Conservancy, The Wildlife Society, and the leadership of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, who persist in using
flawed science and vicious rhetoric like Dauphine's to blame cats for species decline, to stop.»
One can see a number of basic
flaws here; the complete lack of appreciation of the importance of natural variability
on short time scales, the common but erroneous belief that any attribution of past climate change to solar or other forcing means that CO2 has no radiative effect, and a hopeless lack of familiarity of the basic
science of detection and attribution.
And the crescendo: ``... the subject paper... does not follow the scientific methodology of proof, it disagrees with observations, it is based
on flawed referenced papers, and it utilizes a
flawed science that is unrecognized by most of the world.»
However, it is not foolproof — a deeply
flawed paper can end up being published under a number of different potential circumstances: (i) the work is submitted to a journal outside the relevant field (e.g. a paper
on paleoclimate submitted to a social
science journal) where the reviewers are likely to be chosen from a pool of individuals lacking the expertise to properly review the paper, (ii) too few or too unqualified a set of reviewers are chosen by the editor, (iii) the reviewers or editor (or both) have agendas, and overlook
flaws that invalidate the paper's conclusions, and (iv) the journal may process and publish so many papers that individual manuscripts occasionally do not get the editorial attention they deserve.
I find it instructive that in all the years and after all the post of asking people of your mindset to do so, not one — not one — has ever been able to post five scientifically sound, peer - reviewed papers
on climate
science that have not been shown to be
flawed, in error or that have been replicable while showing clear evidence that the existing body of climate
science is wrong.
On the other hand, the same issue had a Pielke Jr. article in it, in which he once more trots out the claim that because virtually the whole mainstream climate
science community (which Pielke refers to loosely as «pro Kyoto» lambasted the
flawed Baliunas et al Climate Research article, we all must be letting our political convictions over-ride our scientific judgement.
On bad media: There has been plenty of misinformation and / or disinformation on climate disseminated by the media over the years — much of it related to the AGW point above (conflating all climate science with flawed examples, or mashing up meanings
On bad media: There has been plenty of misinformation and / or disinformation
on climate disseminated by the media over the years — much of it related to the AGW point above (conflating all climate science with flawed examples, or mashing up meanings
on climate disseminated by the media over the years — much of it related to the AGW point above (conflating all climate
science with
flawed examples, or mashing up meanings).
Of course we have probably all had at least some scepticism of aspects of climate
science, but we examine these things, and realise the
flaws in denier myths and move
on.
In 2001, I learned just how
flawed the «parks and fences» model could be when I reported
on a
Science paper showing how the creation of a panda preserve backfired.
While I could go
on and
on... finally, the AGW models (conjectures based upon a belief but not upon
science) have entirely failed to hold up because they were so
flawed to start with.
But I suggest we can do perfectly good
science on a
flawed premise: sustainability.
The same can not be said of M&M who keep adapting their attacks, making fundamental
flaws, and publish in non-peer reviewed journals
on social aspects of
science.
You stick with
flawed models based
on an imaginary effect — I'll stay with actual
science and repeatable results....
Not only that but what a really weak edifice our
science and scientific institutions must be
on that that the mainstream institutions are likewise hoodwinked into supporting
flawed science and that they have persuaded even Bush and co â $ «who are rolling back environmental regulations left right and center - that they can no longer contest the
science.
This myopic fixation
on anthropogenic factors became its fatal
flaw, leading not only to a warped and incomplete understanding of what drives our climate but also to the politicization and corruption of the IPCC process and, unfortunately, of a good part of climate
science itself.